發(fā)布時間：2018-04-26 05:36

  本文選題：自然資源 + 出口限制措施��； 參考：《遼寧大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：自然資源是人社會賴以生存和發(fā)展的基礎(chǔ),當(dāng)今世界貿(mào)易中自然資源貿(mào)易構(gòu)成了國際貿(mào)易的重要組成部分。中國作為世界上最大的發(fā)展中國家,一直在快速發(fā)展的同時,也向世界供應(yīng)著大量的稀有礦產(chǎn)資源。隨著這些自然資源的長期開發(fā),其儲量迅速下降,由于開發(fā)造成的環(huán)境問題也越來越受到中國的關(guān)注。目前中國開始采取措施逐步減少自然資源的開發(fā)利用,保護維持生態(tài)平衡。采取的諸多措施中包括對這些自然實行出口限制,以減少對資源的開發(fā)。然而作為WTO成員國的中國,采取出口限制措施保護資源的做法,受到其他成員國的指責(zé)。如何在WTO框架下,合理的采取的出口限制措施,保護中國的自然資源,是擺在中國面前的一個重要的問題。 本文由四個部分組成。第一部分主要關(guān)注世界資源貿(mào)易的現(xiàn)狀與存在的主要矛盾。包括自由貿(mào)易與國家對自然資源的主權(quán)之間的矛盾,以及可持續(xù)發(fā)展與自出貿(mào)易之間的矛盾。無論是GATT時期,還是WTO成立以來都不反對在自由貿(mào)易體制下保護自然資源。WTO成立以來更是強調(diào)可持續(xù)發(fā)展與自由貿(mào)易的協(xié)調(diào)。中國作為一個主權(quán)國家有權(quán)利制定自己的資源環(huán)境與貿(mào)易政策。第二部分從當(dāng)前WTO規(guī)則及各成員國采取的主要出口限制措施入手,介紹幾種主要可采取的保護資源的出口限制措施及WTO對這些出口限制措施的態(tài)度。第三部分,從WTO例外條款—GATT第20條的適用角度,分析了采用出口限制措施保護自然資源的條件和要求。通過前三部分的論述可以發(fā)現(xiàn),在WTO框架下原則上反對出口限制措施,但有條件的允許采用出口限制措施保護資源。第四部分,從中國的國情出發(fā),總結(jié)了近期因采取資源出口限制措施而遭遇的幾起貿(mào)易爭端。從這幾起貿(mào)易爭端出發(fā),對中國采取出口限制措施保護資源過程中存在的問題進行了歸納。并針對存在的問題,提出對策。以期在日后采取措施保護資源的過程中,采取合理的出口限制措施減少貿(mào)易爭端的出現(xiàn),維護中國的國家利益。
[Abstract]:Natural resources are the basis of human society's survival and development. Nowadays, natural resources trade constitutes an important part of international trade in the world trade. As the largest developing country in the world, China has been developing rapidly and supplying a lot of rare mineral resources to the world. With the long-term exploitation of these natural resources, the reserves of these natural resources decline rapidly, and the environmental problems caused by the exploitation are paid more and more attention by China. At present, China has begun to take measures to gradually reduce the exploitation and utilization of natural resources and to protect and maintain ecological balance. Among the measures taken are export restrictions on these nature to reduce the exploitation of resources. However, China, a member of the WTO, has been criticised by other countries for taking export restrictions to protect its resources. How to take reasonable export restriction measures and protect China's natural resources under the framework of WTO is an important problem in front of China. This paper consists of four parts. The first part mainly pays attention to the present situation and the main contradiction of the world resource trade. This includes the contradiction between free trade and state sovereignty over natural resources, and between sustainable development and self-trade. No matter in the period of GATT or since the establishment of WTO, there is no objection to the protection of natural resources under the free trade system. Since the establishment of WTO, the coordination between sustainable development and free trade has been emphasized. As a sovereign state, China has the right to formulate its own resource environment and trade policy. The second part begins with the current WTO rules and the main export restriction measures adopted by each member country, and introduces several kinds of export restriction measures which can be taken to protect resources and the attitude of WTO to these export restriction measures. The third part analyzes the conditions and requirements of using export restriction measures to protect natural resources from the perspective of the application of the WTO exception clause-Article 20 of GATT. Through the discussion of the first three parts, it can be found that under the framework of WTO, export restriction measures are opposed in principle, but conditional export restriction measures are allowed to protect resources. The fourth part summarizes several trade disputes caused by resource export restriction measures from the point of view of China's national conditions. Starting from these trade disputes, this paper sums up the problems existing in the process of China taking export restriction measures to protect resources. According to the existing problems, the countermeasures are put forward. In the process of taking measures to protect resources in the future, reasonable export restriction measures should be taken to reduce the appearance of trade disputes and to safeguard China's national interests.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 賀小勇;論WTO體制下資源保障措施的法律問題——以中歐焦炭貿(mào)易爭端為分析視角[J];比較法研究;2004年05期

2 趙海樂;;自然資源出口限制的合法性分析——以美加水資源出口限制糾紛為視角[J];東方法學(xué);2011年01期

3 楊澤偉;論國際法上的自然資源永久主權(quán)及其發(fā)展趨勢[J];法商研究;2003年04期

4 張若思;貿(mào)易、環(huán)境與發(fā)展——WTO多哈發(fā)展議程研討會[J];法學(xué)雜志;2002年05期

5 張若思;重新審視自由貿(mào)易——世界貿(mào)易組織內(nèi)貿(mào)易與環(huán)境的關(guān)系[J];國際貿(mào)易;2002年11期

6 樊瑛;樊慧;;自然資源貿(mào)易:中國應(yīng)對之道[J];國際貿(mào)易;2010年05期

7 李曉玲;;WTO成員限制自然資源產(chǎn)品出口的權(quán)利——中國原材料出口措施案評述[J];國際商務(wù)研究;2010年01期

8 賀小勇;;WTO框架下中美原材料出口限制爭端的法律問題[J];國際商務(wù)研究;2010年03期

9 彭德雷;龔柏華;;WTO專家組有關(guān)中國原材料出口限制措施案中GATT第20條例外援引評析[J];國際商務(wù)研究;2011年05期

10 李慧英,黃桂琴;論國家主權(quán)的讓渡[J];河北法學(xué);2004年07期

，

本文編號：1804739