發(fā)布時間：2018-04-24 11:34

  本文選題：屬人法 + 國籍和住所　； 參考：《大連海事大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：在國際私法領(lǐng)域,屬人法是解決法律沖突,確定準(zhǔn)據(jù)法的一個重要系屬公式。從歷史發(fā)展來看,國籍和住所發(fā)展源遠(yuǎn)流長,是最主要的兩個個屬法連結(jié)因素,可以說,大陸法系的國際私法學(xué)說史是屬人主義與屬地主義交織發(fā)展史,英美法系國家的國際私法學(xué)說則從一開始便帶有極強(qiáng)的屬地主義色彩。屬人法連結(jié)點(diǎn)的發(fā)展大約經(jīng)歷了三個歷史階段：古羅馬至19世紀(jì)是住所地主義形成時期；19世紀(jì)至20世紀(jì)中葉是國籍原則與住所地主義的并存時期；20世紀(jì)中葉至今是屬人法連結(jié)點(diǎn)的新發(fā)展時期。隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化進(jìn)程的加速,國際民商事交往日益紛繁復(fù)雜,各國國內(nèi)法和一些國際公約都廣泛采用慣常居所作為國際民商事案件管轄權(quán)和法律選擇的連結(jié)因素。 屬人法的本國法和住所地法的理解,使得國籍與住所兩個連結(jié)點(diǎn)產(chǎn)生矛盾和沖突,也產(chǎn)生了大陸法系本國法主義和英美法系住所地法主義的紛爭。在屬人法問題上,普通法系和大陸法系一直存在著對立的局面,協(xié)調(diào)和解決兩大法系之間的矛盾以形成統(tǒng)一的屬人法,一直是國際社會所追求的目標(biāo)。本文在考察兩大法系采用屬人法標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的歷史和現(xiàn)實(shí)的基礎(chǔ)上,深入分析了國籍和住所作為屬人法的連結(jié)點(diǎn)因素的利弊,認(rèn)為當(dāng)今國際私法上屬人法的發(fā)展在于慣常居所地法取代住所地法和國藉法,從而形成了以慣常居所原則為主,輔以國籍、住所原則綜合確定屬人法的局面。我國立法也已注意了這趨向并在有關(guān)法律上得到體現(xiàn)。而在當(dāng)今國際社會中,國籍與住所的調(diào)和已成為一種趨勢,而慣常居所連結(jié)點(diǎn)取代國籍和住所日益成為矛盾解決的積極措施。
[Abstract]:In the field of private international law, personal law is an important formula for resolving conflicts of laws and determining applicable law. From the historical development point of view, the development of nationality and residence has a long history and is the two most important conjunctive factors of law. It can be said that the history of private international law theory in the continental law system is the history of the intertwining of personality and territorialism. The doctrine of private international law in Anglo-American law system countries had a strong territorialism from the beginning. The development of the joint point of personal law has gone through three historical stages: from ancient Rome to the 19th century was the formation of domicile Doctrine; from the 19th century to the middle of the 20th century was the coexistence of the principle of nationality and domicile Doctrine; from the middle of the 20th century to the present day It is the new development period of the joint point of personal law. With the acceleration of the process of economic globalization, international civil and commercial exchanges become more and more complicated. The habitual residence is widely adopted as the connecting factor of jurisdiction and choice of law in international civil and commercial cases in various countries' domestic laws and some international conventions. The understanding of personal law and domicile law leads to the contradiction and conflict between nationality and domicile, as well as the disputes between the civil law system and the common law system. On the question of personal law, the common law system and the civil law system have always had the opposite situation. It is the goal that the international society pursues all the time to coordinate and solve the contradiction between the two legal systems to form the unified personal law. On the basis of investigating the history and reality of adopting the personal law standard in the two legal systems, this paper analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of nationality and domicile as the connecting points of personal law. The author holds that the development of personal law in private international law lies in the replacement of the law of domicile and nationality by the law of habitual residence, thus forming a situation in which the principle of habitual residence is given priority to, supplemented by nationality, and the principle of domicile synthetically determines personal law. China's legislation has also paid attention to this trend and has been reflected in the relevant laws. In today's international society, the harmony between nationality and residence has become a trend, and the replacement of nationality and residence by the point of habitual residence has increasingly become an active measure to resolve the conflict.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D997

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 宣增益;國家間判決承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行中的管轄權(quán)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)比較研究[J];比較法研究;2005年03期

2 單海玲;;論涉外民事關(guān)系中住所及慣常居所的法律適用[J];比較法研究;2006年02期

3 胡家強(qiáng);對國際私法調(diào)整對象和范圍的重新認(rèn)識[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年06期

4 黃進(jìn),郭華成;澳門國際私法中的屬人法與屬地法[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;1997年03期

5 陳衛(wèi)佐;;日本國際私法的最新改革[J];法律適用;2009年02期

6 屈廣清;;論保護(hù)弱者的國際私法方法及其立法完善——以沖突規(guī)范的保護(hù)方法為中心[J];法商研究;2006年05期

7 王霖華;關(guān)于我國自然人屬人法制度的思考[J];廣州大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2004年03期

8 杜煥芳,王吉文,崔小艷;中國區(qū)際屬人法問題芻議[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年02期

9 陳小云;屈廣清;;英國屬人法問題研究:從堅(jiān)持傳統(tǒng)到溫和改革[J];河北法學(xué);2006年04期

10 蘇志霞;王文錄;;論戶籍制度的功能定位[J];河北師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2007年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王偉偉;戶籍與住所制度考[D];中國政法大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號：1796457