本文選題：軟法 + 互聯(lián)網(wǎng)治理��； 參考：《寧夏社會科學(xué)》2017年04期

【摘要】：互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的國際治理迄今尚處于失序狀態(tài),一方面是美國一方主導(dǎo)的"多利益攸關(guān)方"治理模式,另一方面是廣大發(fā)展中國家立基于維互聯(lián)網(wǎng)安全的治理觀,兩者的沖突致使國際治理陷入困境�；ヂ�(lián)網(wǎng)的國際秩序亟待法治,軟法因為自身更容易被簽署、更迅捷地進(jìn)入到實施階段、更靈活地適應(yīng)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)治理的需要等獨特優(yōu)勢,能夠在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)國際治理中展其所長,最大限度地凝聚各方共識并發(fā)揮導(dǎo)向及中轉(zhuǎn)的功能。軟法在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)國際治理中產(chǎn)生實效的根源在于民主協(xié)商的對話機(jī)制和廣泛參與的合作機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:The international governance of the Internet has so far been in a state of disarray. On the one hand, it is the "multi-stakeholder" governance model led by the United States side; on the other hand, the vast number of developing countries have a view of governance based on Internet security. The conflict between the two has led to a dilemma in international governance. The international order of the Internet is in urgent need of the rule of law. Soft law, because it is easier to sign itself, more quickly enters the implementation stage, and adapts more flexibly to the needs of Internet governance, can develop its advantages in Internet international governance. To maximize the consensus of all parties and play the role of guidance and transit. The root of the effectiveness of soft law in Internet international governance lies in the dialogue mechanism of democratic consultation and the cooperation mechanism of extensive participation.
【作者單位】： 北京大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：天津市社科規(guī)劃項目“作為政府監(jiān)管工具的‘評級’研究”(項目編號:TJFX16-002Q)的階段性成果
【分類號】：D997.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 新聞所 孟威;解讀歐盟互聯(lián)網(wǎng)法律監(jiān)管[N];中國社會科學(xué)院院報;2007年

，

本文編號：1796291