發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-22 22:05

  本文選題：ECFA + 區(qū)際法律沖突��； 參考：《大連海事大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：2010年6月29日,海峽兩岸正式簽訂了《海峽兩岸經(jīng)濟(jì)合作框架協(xié)議》(即ECFA), ECFA的最終簽署是兩岸關(guān)系和平發(fā)展的一個(gè)重要里程碑。自上世紀(jì)40年代開(kāi)始,由于特殊的歷史原因,兩岸交往被人為隔絕。直到上世紀(jì)70年代末,在大陸政府的不懈努力下,海峽兩岸之間的交往,從無(wú)到有,日益密切。但是由于兩岸社會(huì)制度、法律制度的不同,這必然會(huì)導(dǎo)致大量民商事法律沖突的產(chǎn)生。ECFA的簽署使兩岸經(jīng)貿(mào)往來(lái)進(jìn)一步深化,因此探討海峽兩岸的民商事法律沖突的解決具有極其重要的意義。 筆者試圖從國(guó)際私法角度找到一條有效解決現(xiàn)階段兩岸民商事法律沖突的途徑。本為在寫(xiě)作上分為四部分：第一部分對(duì)ECFA的簽署背景、必要性以及發(fā)展前景進(jìn)行簡(jiǎn)單介紹,通過(guò)類比CEPA(即“關(guān)于建立更緊密經(jīng)貿(mào)關(guān)系的安排”)和FTA(即“自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定”)明確界定了ECFA的法律屬性,即在“一個(gè)中國(guó)”前提下的特殊國(guó)內(nèi)法律安排。第二部分著重對(duì)海峽兩岸私法沖突的性質(zhì)進(jìn)行界定。通過(guò)對(duì)海峽兩岸私法沖突產(chǎn)生原因及性質(zhì)進(jìn)行分析,闡明海峽兩岸私法沖突實(shí)際上是特殊的區(qū)際法律沖突。第三部分則分節(jié)探討了ECFA框架下海峽兩岸在旅游、空運(yùn)直航、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)以及商業(yè)銀行法律制度這四個(gè)領(lǐng)域的私法沖突問(wèn)題,說(shuō)明了兩岸私法沖突問(wèn)題亟待解決。最后一部分,通過(guò)研究當(dāng)前各多法域國(guó)家解決區(qū)際法律沖突所采取的方式,結(jié)合我國(guó)海峽兩岸私法沖突的特殊性,提出解決海峽兩岸私法沖突的切實(shí)有效方法。 目前解決海峽兩岸私法沖突的方法有很多,但是究竟應(yīng)該采取何種方法,應(yīng)當(dāng)結(jié)合海峽來(lái)兩岸私法沖突的特點(diǎn)。在“一個(gè)中國(guó)”、“一國(guó)兩制”的前提下,筆者認(rèn)為解決海峽兩岸私法沖突的方法是：一是簽署國(guó)際私法協(xié)議；二是類推適用各自國(guó)際私法。
[Abstract]:On June 29, 2010, the two sides of the Taiwan Strait formally signed the Framework Agreement on Economic Cooperation between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. The final signing of the ECFA is an important milestone in the peaceful development of cross-strait relations. Since the 1940s, due to special historical reasons, cross-strait exchanges have been artificially isolated. Until the late 1970s, with the unremitting efforts of the mainland government, the exchanges between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait grew closer from scratch. However, due to the different social systems and legal systems across the Taiwan Strait, this will inevitably lead to the emergence of a large number of conflicts of civil and commercial laws. The signing of ECFA will further deepen cross-strait economic and trade exchanges. Therefore, it is of great significance to discuss the conflict of civil and commercial laws between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. The author tries to find an effective way to solve the conflict of civil and commercial laws between the two sides of the strait from the angle of private international law. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part introduces the background, necessity and development prospect of ECFA. By analogy with CEPA (the CEPA on the Establishment of closer Economic Partnership) and FTAs (Free Trade Agreement), the legal attributes of the ECFA are clearly defined, that is, special domestic legal arrangements under the premise of "one China". The second part focuses on defining the nature of the conflict between the two sides of the strait. Based on the analysis of the causes and nature of the conflict between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, this paper expounds that the conflict between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait is actually a special interregional conflict of laws. The third part discusses the conflict of private law between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait in the four fields of tourism, direct air transportation, intellectual property protection and the legal system of commercial banks under the framework of ECFA, which shows that the conflict of private law between the two sides of the strait should be solved urgently. In the last part, the author puts forward the effective method to solve the conflict of private law between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait by studying the ways adopted by the countries in various jurisdictions to solve the conflict of laws between the two regions, and combining with the particularity of the conflict of private law between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. There are many ways to resolve the conflict between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, but what methods should be adopted, which should be combined with the characteristics of the conflict between the two sides of the strait. Under the premise of "one China" and "one country, two systems", the author thinks that the solution to the conflict of private law between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait is as follows: first, signing an agreement on private international law; secondly, applying their private international law by analogy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D923;D997

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 崔鳳茹;;中國(guó)FTA發(fā)展的現(xiàn)狀和趨勢(shì)[J];北方經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年08期

2 劉喜平;;海峽兩岸區(qū)際法律沖突的特點(diǎn)及解決途徑[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年04期

3 陳小云,屈廣清;海峽兩岸新近修正之專利法比較研究[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年04期

4 蘭曉原;鄭向敏;;開(kāi)放大陸居民赴臺(tái)旅游新形勢(shì)下海西旅游發(fā)展的思考[J];福建論壇(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年08期

5 閆鴻鸝;;雙邊FTA與WTO協(xié)定的關(guān)系研究[J];貴州工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年03期

6 顧玲娜;;從CEPA看ECFA的簽署[J];消費(fèi)導(dǎo)刊;2010年01期

7 韋鴻翰;;試論我國(guó)區(qū)際法律沖突的解決模式[J];哈爾濱學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

8 曾令良;;WTO框架下兩岸經(jīng)濟(jì)合作框架協(xié)定的法律定位[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2009年06期

9 馮彩紅;馮艷紅;;淺議ECFA與兩岸知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)合作與保護(hù)[J];海峽科技與產(chǎn)業(yè);2010年04期

10 唐永紅;;簽訂ECFA對(duì)臺(tái)灣經(jīng)濟(jì)的八大影響[J];兩岸關(guān)系;2010年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 劉冰;兩岸直航相關(guān)法律比較研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2010年

2 張t，

本文編號(hào)：1789129