發(fā)布時間：2018-08-28 19:33

【摘要】：目的探討點觸式探針在鑄型結(jié)石超聲碎石清石手術的安全性與可行性。方法將45例腎鑄型結(jié)石隨機分成兩組,觀察組22例,對照組23例。兩組分別用點觸式探針和原平面超聲探針行經(jīng)皮腎鏡超聲碎石清石術。術中觀察兩種探針對尿路黏膜損傷情況,并準確記錄碎石時間和結(jié)石體積,計算碎石清石速度。結(jié)果點觸式探針的碎石清石時間和速度明顯優(yōu)于平面探針(P0.05),其速度是原超聲探針的1.9倍。對照組出現(xiàn)多例輕微的黏膜吸附傷,無需處理,觀察組未出現(xiàn)尿路黏膜吸附傷和刺傷。觀察組和對照組結(jié)石清石率分別為95.45%(21/22)和91.33%(21/23),兩組差異無統(tǒng)計學意義。結(jié)論點觸式探針碎石速度快,效率高,安全性好,有較好的臨床推廣應用價值。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the safety and feasibility of point-touch probe in ultrasonic lithotripsy for cast stone. Methods 45 cases of renal cast stones were randomly divided into two groups: observation group (n = 22) and control group (n = 23). Two groups were treated by percutaneous nephroscopic lithotripsy with point touch probe and original plane ultrasonic probe. Intraoperative observation of urinary tract mucosal injury with two probes, accurate recording of lithotripsy time and volume of stone, and calculation of lithotripsy clearance speed. Results the lithotripsy time and velocity of point touch probe were better than that of planar probe (P0.05), and the velocity was 1.9 times of that of the original ultrasonic probe. In the control group, there were several slight mucosal adhesion injuries without treatment, and no urinary mucosal adhesion injury or stab injury was found in the observation group. The stone removal rates of observation group and control group were 95.45% (21 / 22) and 91.33% (21 / 23) respectively. Conclusion Point-touch probe lithotripsy has the advantages of high speed, high efficiency, good safety and good clinical application value.
【作者單位】： 南京中醫(yī)藥大學連云港附屬醫(yī)院;連云港市中醫(yī)院泌尿外科;徐州醫(yī)學院附屬醫(yī)院泌尿外科;蚌埠醫(yī)學院附屬連云港醫(yī)院;連云港市第二人民醫(yī)院泌尿外科;
【分類號】：R699

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 熊六林;黃曉波;葉雄俊;馬凱;許清泉;李建興;王曉峰;;CQS-01超聲氣壓彈道碎石清石系統(tǒng)在經(jīng)皮腎鏡手術中的應用[J];北京大學學報(醫(yī)學版);2012年04期

2 黃鶴鳴;朱永新;蔡茂林;黃鵬鳴;周榮生;;CT檢查預測尿石成份及體外碎石效果的研究[J];江西醫(yī)藥;2011年02期

3 李鵬超;宋日進;孟小鑫;呂強;張煒;殷長軍;李杰;;雙頻雙導管超聲碎石系統(tǒng)治療腎結(jié)石療效分析[J];臨床泌尿外科雜志;2012年01期

4 鐘磊;郭劍明;徐志兵;孫陽;王國民;;X線引導下經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術治療完全性鹿角形腎結(jié)石[J];現(xiàn)代泌尿外科雜志;2013年01期

5 廖勇;李康;黃建林;安宇;邱明星;;經(jīng)皮腎鏡下應用雙頻雙導管超聲碎石系統(tǒng)與單導管超聲碎石系統(tǒng)治療腎結(jié)石的比較(附138例報告)[J];臨床泌尿外科雜志;2013年02期

6 王強;孫家慶;晁亮;曹成松;孫光耀;吳永第;王軍起;;經(jīng)皮腎鏡超聲碎石清石術在治療結(jié)石性膿腎中的應用[J];現(xiàn)代泌尿外科雜志;2013年03期

7 李楊;曾峰;楊中青;陳合群;;B超引導下經(jīng)皮腎鏡雙導管碎石術與氣壓彈道聯(lián)合超聲碎石術治療鹿角形腎結(jié)石的療效比較[J];中南大學學報(醫(yī)學版);2013年08期

8 徐宏偉;金承俊;閻俊;張誠;;經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術的研究現(xiàn)狀及并發(fā)癥防治策略[J];臨床泌尿外科雜志;2014年02期

9 張鶴;姜寧;王國增;章t，

本文編號：2210395