發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-03 13:00

  本文選題：諧聲偏旁 + 形聲字�。� 參考：《陜西理工大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：本論文《段玉裁說文解字注形聲字古音歸部研究》主要圍繞段玉裁《說文解字注》關(guān)于形聲字的古音歸部進(jìn)行了以下三個(gè)方面的研究:首先,在考查段氏《古十七部諧聲表》中凡1521個(gè)諧聲偏旁在《說文解字注》中的古韻歸部時(shí),發(fā)現(xiàn)其中有66個(gè)諧聲偏旁在《說文解字注》與《古十七部諧聲表》中的古韻歸部并不一致;而進(jìn)一步分析這66個(gè)諧聲偏旁在《說文解字注》與《古十七部諧聲表》中古韻歸部不一致的原因時(shí),發(fā)現(xiàn)學(xué)術(shù)界部分學(xué)者所認(rèn)為的“同諧聲者必同部”理論是段玉裁關(guān)于形聲字的古音歸部原則是不對的;否則,便不會出現(xiàn)出自同一人之手的同一諧聲偏旁竟然在《古十七部諧聲表》與《說文解字注》中分別歸入不同韻部的矛盾現(xiàn)象。其次,通過抽查《說文解字注》中較有代表性的凡15組同聲符的形聲字,分析它們古韻歸入不同韻部的事實(shí),說明段玉裁對《說文解字》形聲字進(jìn)行古音歸部的依據(jù)是:韻腳字,段氏依實(shí)際押韻情況歸部。其中,對于一字入兩韻者,段氏取押韻次數(shù)多的那部入韻音為歸部音。非韻腳字,段氏或取其今音上推,或根據(jù)同韻系聯(lián)的方法,將同聲符、且中古同韻的形聲字系聯(lián)歸入同一韻部。再次,本文從發(fā)生學(xué)、諧聲造字的角度對段玉裁“同諧聲者必同部”理論進(jìn)行了科學(xué)、深入分析,說明段氏“同諧聲者必同部”理論只作為諧聲造字的原則、適用于形聲字創(chuàng)制之初,在“以事為名,取譬相成”的諧聲造字過程中建立并固定在形聲字結(jié)構(gòu)中的諧聲關(guān)系具有初始性和不變性,不能被當(dāng)做是段氏《說文解字注》關(guān)于形聲字的古音歸部依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:In this thesis, Duan Yu-cai 's explanation of the ancient phonetic part of the Chinese characters is studied in the following three aspects: first, the research focuses on the ancient phonetic part of Duan Yu-cai 's "Shuo-wen Jie Zi": first of all, there are three aspects of the research on the ancient phonetic part of the pictophonetic characters: first of all, In the examination of Duan's "Ancient Seventeen Harmonic Sound Meter", where 1521 harmonics deviate from the ancient rhyme in "Shuowen Jie Zi Note", It is found that 66 of them are not consistent with the ancient rhyme in Shuowen Jie Zi Note and the Ancient Seventeen harmonics Table. While further analyzing the reasons why these 66 harmonics deviate from the ancient rhyme in Shuowen Jie Zi Note and the Ancient Seventeen Harmonic Sound Table, It is found that Duan Yu-cai 's theory of "harmony and harmony must be the same part" is wrong for some scholars in academic circles, otherwise, it is wrong for Duan Yu-cai 's ancient pronunciation to belong to the same part of phonetic characters; otherwise, There would be no contradiction between the same harmonic sound deviation from the same person's hand and the different prosodic parts in the "Ancient Seventeen harmonics Table" and the "Shuowen Jie Zi Note". Secondly, through the random examination of 15 groups of phonetic characters of homophonic characters in Shuo Wen Jie Zi Note, the paper analyzes the fact that their ancient rhymes belong to different prosody parts. It is explained that Duan Yu-cai 's ancient phonetic part of Shuowen Jie character is based on prosodic word and Duan's rhyme according to the actual rhyme. Among them, for a word into two rhymes, Duan took the rhyme number of that part of the rhyme into the part. Non-rhyme characters, Duan's or their phonetic push up, or according to the method of rhyme, the synonym, and the ancient synonymous phonetic system into the same prosody. Thirdly, this paper makes a deep analysis of Duan Yu-cai 's theory of "the same harmonics must be the same part" from the perspective of genomics and harmonics, and explains that Duan's theory of "the same harmonics must be the same part" is only used as the principle of the harmonic acoustics. At the beginning of the creation of pictophonetic characters, in the process of constructing and fixing the harmonic sound relations in the structure of pictophonetic characters in the name of "in the name of things, taking analogies and complementary to each other", the harmonics relationship established and fixed in the structure of pictophonetic characters is of initial and invariance. It can not be regarded as the ancient phonetic basis of Duan's "Shuo Wen Jie Zi" about pictophonetic characters.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：陜西理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：H122

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉忠華;趙詩Z，

本文編號：1838579