發(fā)布時間：2024-06-01 14:12

　　隱喻的研究從古典修辭學(xué)走到認(rèn)知語言學(xué),經(jīng)歷了方法、模式以及思路的變革。亞里士多德將隱喻定義為“將另一物體的名稱來指稱這一物體”。直至上個世紀(jì)80年代,Lakoff等人提出了“概念隱喻理論”,將其從認(rèn)知的角度重新定義為“不僅是一種修辭手法,更是一種認(rèn)知的工具,使人類賴以生存的思維慣勢。(Lakoff,1980) 近期研究呈現(xiàn)這樣的趨勢:語言學(xué)者們以隱喻機(jī)制為中心,開始對概念隱喻和概念整合這兩個理論的異同比較展開探討,將二者進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)的對比分析,總結(jié)出一系列的異同點(diǎn)。本研究發(fā)現(xiàn),前期研究結(jié)果存在如下的局限性: [1]對二者的特點(diǎn)解釋得不夠全面,涵蓋面較淺。 [2]對二者的架構(gòu)分析欠缺深度,尤其是概念整合的合成過程缺乏詳細(xì)說明。 [3]在二理論的構(gòu)建條件和基礎(chǔ),建構(gòu)的合理性,以及層創(chuàng)結(jié)構(gòu)方面,尚存空白。 綜上,學(xué)者普遍認(rèn)為,二者存在明顯差異,有的語言學(xué)家還將其二理論歸為無法兼容的不同學(xué)科領(lǐng)域(Coulson, 2000)。這正是本文要說明的問題,即,二者可以在特定條件下有機(jī)結(jié)合,統(tǒng)一在共同的理論框架下,形成綜合性、適用性更強(qiáng)的綜合性認(rèn)知理論框架,解釋更為廣泛的語言學(xué)現(xiàn)象。這是本文的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)之一。...

【文章頁數(shù)】：81 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Abstract
摘要
Part 1 Introduction
    1.1 The Problem
    1.2 Research Questions and Objectives
        1.2.1 Research questions
        1.2.2 Objectives
    1.3 Type of Research and Hypothesis
        1.3.1 The type of research
        1.3.2 Hypothesis
    1.4 Data
    1.5 Summary
Part 2 Theoretical Framework and Related Literature
    2.1 Theoretical Framework
        2.1.1 Foundation of the conceptual metaphor theory
        2.1.2 Embodied cognition about CMT
        2.1.3 Development on conceptual metaphor
        2.1.4 Fauconnier and Turner’s theory on conceptual integration
        2.1.5 Connection between CMT and BT
    2.2 Related Literature
        2.2.1 Introduction
        2.2.2 Views on Conceptual metaphor
        2.2.3 Views on conceptual integration
        2.2.4 Views on comparison of CMT and CIT
        2.2.5 Views about Inheritance of Connotation and Denotation
Part 3 Methods
    3.1 Introduction
    3.2 Materials
        3.2.1 Data collection on CM
        3.2.2 Data collection focuses on the course of CI
        3.2.3 Data about relation between CM and CI
    3.3 Design
    3.4 Analysis
    3.5 Procedure
Part 4 Results
    4.1 Introduction
        4.1.1 The features of metaphor in Chinese
        4.1.2 The features of blending theory
        4.1.3 The existing problem
        4.1.4 Type hierarchy and stereotypical relations
        4.1.5 Type hierarchy structure and metaphor
        4.1.6 Blending theory and connotation-denotation
    4.2 Findings and Enlightenments
        4.2.1 The theoretical analysis on CM
        4.2.2 The framework of conceptual integration
        4.2.3 Defects on CMT
        4.2.4 Emergent Structure of BT
        4.2.5 The general comparison between BT and CMT
Part 5 Discussion
    5.1 Introduction
    5.2 The Core of the Metaphoric Mechanism
        5.2.1 Basic construction of CM
        5.2.2 Metaphoric mechanism and the inheritance of denotation and connotation
    5.3 The Unique Features of BT
        5.3.1 Three basic process of BT and emergent structure
        5.3.2 Optimal principles and the inheritance of denotation and connotation
    5.4 Comparison between CM and CI
        5.4.1 Operating process of CM and CI
        5.4.2 Entrenched structure and on-line process
        5.4.3 Directionality of the two theories
    5.5 Fusion and Connection of CM and CI
        5.5.1 Counterpart connection
        5.5.2 The recurred promotion of CM and CI
    5.6 Application of the Two Theories
    5.7 Summary
        5.7.1 The general comparison
        5.7.2 Inference process of CM and BI
Part 6 Conclusion
    6.1 Summary
    6.2 The Significance of the Paper
        6.2.1 Theoretical significance
        6.2.2 Practical significance
    6.3 Validity and Reliability
    6.4 Limitations and Further Research
Bibliography
Published Paper
Acknowledgements



本文編號：3986010