本文選題：“行了” + 語氣詞��； 參考：《湘潭大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：“行了”既是一個短語，又是一個義項比較豐富的詞。但是對它的研究還比較少。論文用描寫與解釋、演繹與歸納、形式與意義等方法從共時與歷時兩個方面對“行了”進行比較全面的研究。 首先，我們將“行了”分為“行了1”（包括“行動+了”與“行形+了”）、“行了2”（語氣詞）與“行了3”（包括應答語與話語標記）三種用法，然后利用句法、語義與功能三個類似三個平面的結構對“行了”進行共時平面的分析。我們認為“行了”可以作獨立成分、獨立語和謂語.并且分析了“行了”的變異形式：“行了行了”與“行啦”及其重疊形式“行啦行啦”。變異形式在意義與功能上并沒有太多變化，但是語氣的輕重緩急會有不同。 其次，“行了”包括“肯認型”、“否認型”與“過渡型”三種語義類型。同時還分析了三種語用意義，即“肯定義否定用”、“真性埋怨與假性埋怨”與“埋怨型的交際意義”。另外，三種“行了”還分布在行、知、言三域，表達不同的語義。 再次，我們探討了“行了”的語篇功能（包括話語組織功能與言語行為功能）和人際功能。人際功能又包括傳信表義、焦點表述、主觀評價與中止行為四種功能。 最后，論文主要探討了語氣詞“行了2”與獨用形式“行了3”的來源。我們認為“行了”最基本形式是“行了11”（行動+了），然后引申出形容詞“行”，形成格式“行了12”（行形+了）�！靶辛�1”位于句尾，前面還有其他謂語時，，就漸漸固化成為語氣詞“行了2”；當它處于句頭并且獨立使用時，就形成了應答語“行了31”。當“行了31”的應答義減弱，不耐煩甚至埋怨的意義增強并且固化的時候就形成了話語標記“行了32”。在“行了”的詞匯化與語法化過程中還伴隨著主觀化，即從“行了1”到“行了3”主觀性逐漸增強。語體對“行了”的用法與演化也有很大影響。
[Abstract]:It is not only a phrase, but also a word with rich meanings. But there is little research on it. In this paper, description and explanation, deduction and induction, form and meaning are used to make a more comprehensive study on "Xing Xing" from two aspects: synchronic and diachronic. First, we divide "line" into "line 1" (including "action" and "line shape"), "line 2" (mood word) and "line 3" (including responders and discourse markers), and then use syntax. Semantic and functional structures are similar to three planes. We think that the word "does" can be used as independent components, independent words and predicates. And analyzed the variant form of "did": "OK" and "OK" and its overlapping form "OK". The form of variation does not change much in meaning and function, but the priorities of tone are different. Secondly, there are three kinds of semantic types: "willing recognition", "denial" and "transition". At the same time, it analyzes three kinds of pragmatic meanings, that is, "positive meaning and negative use", "truth complaint and false complaint" and "complaint type communication meaning". In addition, three kinds of "did" are also distributed in line, knowledge, three fields of speech, expressing different semantics. Thirdly, we discuss the discourse function (including discourse organization function and speech act function) and interpersonal function. Interpersonal function includes four kinds of functions: message expression, focus expression, subjective evaluation and discontinuance. Finally, the paper mainly discusses the source of the modal word "line 2" and the only form of "line 3". We think that the most basic form is "line 11" (action), and then extend the adjective "line", forming a format of "line 12" (line shape). "line 1" at the end of the sentence, followed by other predicates, gradually solidifies into the modal word "line 2"; when it is at the beginning of the sentence and is used independently, the response word "line 31" is formed. When the response meaning of "line 31" weakens, the meaning of impatience and even resentment increases and solidifies, a discourse marker "line 32" is formed. In the process of lexicalization and grammaticalization, the subjectivity gradually increases from "line 1" to "line 3". Stylistic style also has great influence on the usage and evolution of "Xing Li".
【學位授予單位】：湘潭大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：H146

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 姜向榮;;話語標記“對了”的篇章銜接功能[J];德州學院學報;2008年01期

2 吳鵬;;古漢語“行”義動詞的詞義分析[J];德州學院學報;2011年05期

3 徐時儀;論詞組結構功能的虛化[J];復旦學報(社會科學版);1998年05期

4 李君;殷樹林;;說提醒標記“你看”[J];求是學刊;2011年03期

5 董秀芳;;詞匯化與話語標記的形成[J];世界漢語教學;2007年01期

6 樂耀;;從“不是我說你”類話語標記的形成看會話中主觀性范疇與語用原則的互動[J];世界漢語教學;2011年01期

7 殷樹林;;也說“完了”[J];世界漢語教學;2011年03期

8 張建;;漢語標記配套型并列結構時間關聯(lián)特征的象似性[J];世界漢語教學;2013年01期

9 沈家煊;“語法化”研究綜觀[J];外語教學與研究;1994年04期

10 黃春妮;;試論作為話語標記的“說來說去”[J];文學界(理論版);2011年05期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 李咸菊;北京口語常用話語標記研究[D];北京語言大學;2008年

本文編號：2112142