梵凈山世界自然遺產(chǎn)提名地突出普遍價值保護管理研究
本文選題:世界自然遺產(chǎn) + 梵凈山。 參考:《貴州師范大學》2017年碩士論文
【摘要】:聯(lián)合國教科文組織制定的《保護世界文化與自然遺產(chǎn)公約》(下稱《公約》)是最具權(quán)威性的國際遺產(chǎn)保護工具,其核心內(nèi)容在于確認、保護、保存、展示具有突出普遍價值(Outstanding Universal Value)的文化和自然遺產(chǎn),并將其代代相傳!秾嵤┦澜邕z產(chǎn)公約操作指南》(下稱《操作指南》)旨在促進《公約》的順利實施,為遺產(chǎn)申報及保護工作設(shè)置相應操作程序,反映了遺產(chǎn)保護運動的發(fā)展軌跡。入選世界遺產(chǎn)名錄是對現(xiàn)存資源的最大肯定,也是對其突出普遍價值開展更高級別保護的有效措施。按照《公約》精神,申報項目一旦被列入世界遺產(chǎn)名錄,就意味著締約國向國際社會做出承諾,將舉上下之力、最大限度地利用本國資源及國際援助來保護、保存世界遺產(chǎn)。梵凈山是中國2018年世界自然遺產(chǎn)申報項目,本研究以梵凈山提名地及緩沖區(qū)為研究區(qū)域,在總結(jié)梵凈山世界自然遺產(chǎn)突出普遍價值的基礎(chǔ)上,通過實地考察、文獻綜述、開放式訪談、問卷調(diào)查和數(shù)理統(tǒng)計等方法,深入分析梵凈山遺產(chǎn)價值保護的主要威脅因素,并提出具有針對性的保護管理對策及建議,得出的主要結(jié)論如下:1.自然災害對梵凈山突出普遍價值保護有嚴重威脅,需引起重視,加強監(jiān)測。本文按致災因子的不同,將梵凈山自然災害歸類為地質(zhì)災害、氣象水文災害以及生物災害,描述了景觀資源、生物資源等暴露于致災因子作用下,產(chǎn)生的區(qū)域性災難后果及可能性損失。通過對現(xiàn)有災害點的GPS定位、頻度及其形成背景、時空分布普遍性、復雜多樣性等特征綜合分析發(fā)現(xiàn),自然災害正以不同方式、不同程度威脅著梵凈山突出普遍價值。2.不合理的人類活動正成為梵凈山突出普遍價值保護的主要威脅因素。基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)在一定程度上阻斷了生物通道和走廊,割裂了生態(tài)聯(lián)系,對研究區(qū)的突出普遍價值保護造成一定壓力。旅游資源的無序開發(fā)是梵凈山自然景觀及野生動植物棲息地的重要威脅,具體影響包括游客量持續(xù)增長、游客行為時空分布不均、旅游生態(tài)環(huán)境質(zhì)量下降、旅游垃圾日益凸顯、旅游開發(fā)經(jīng)營與資源保護難以協(xié)調(diào)。社區(qū)原住民對自然資源的過度依賴是梵凈山突出普遍價值保護的又一重要威脅,種植、養(yǎng)殖、放牧、薪柴采集等傳統(tǒng)資源利用占據(jù)重要地位,這些干擾短時間內(nèi)難以消除,甚至還會持續(xù)存在,必須引起關(guān)注。3.改變原住民過度依賴自然資源的生計策略是進一步保護梵凈山突出普遍價值的關(guān)鍵。社區(qū)自然資源依賴度及其影響因素的實證分析表明,農(nóng)戶的自然資源依賴度總體水平較高,其中,收入依賴度為29.86%,14.52%的農(nóng)戶對自然資源的依賴度在90%以上,能源依賴度為58.24%,無明顯分異,薪柴是農(nóng)戶的剛性資源需求。林地面積、戶主受教育程度、外出務工人數(shù)、家庭兼業(yè)程度、家庭借貸水平對農(nóng)戶的自然資源依賴有顯著影響。4.論文在深入分析研究區(qū)突出普遍價值的構(gòu)成及威脅基礎(chǔ)上,對比研究國內(nèi)同類型遺產(chǎn)地保護管理經(jīng)驗,探索性地提出了相關(guān)對策和建議。從減緩威脅的角度,提出要積極應對自然災害風險,嚴格管控基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施無序修建、深化旅游管理、理性發(fā)展生態(tài)旅游,重視社區(qū)發(fā)展訴求,完善社區(qū)共管模式。從管理有效性的角度,建議管理部門開展有針對性的物種保護,構(gòu)建梵凈山和洋溪保護區(qū)的協(xié)同共管機制,適時編制《梵凈山保護管理規(guī)劃》,全面提升管理水平和效能。
[Abstract]:The UNESCO Convention for the protection of the world's cultural and natural heritage (hereinafter referred to as the Convention) is the most authoritative tool for international heritage protection. Its core is to identify, protect, preserve, and display the cultural and natural heritage of the Outstanding Universal Value, and to pass it on for generations. < implementation of the world. The guide to the operation of the Heritage Convention (hereinafter referred to as the guide to operation) aims to promote the smooth implementation of the Convention and set up the corresponding operating procedures for the application and protection of the heritage. It reflects the development track of the heritage conservation movement. The entry of the world heritage list is the greatest affirmation of the existing resources and the higher level of protection for its outstanding universal value. In accordance with the spirit of the Convention, the declaration project, once included in the world heritage list, means that the State Party will make a commitment to the international community and will make the best use of its own resources and international assistance to protect and preserve the world heritage. Van Jing mountain is a China's 2018 World natural heritage declaration project. This study is based on the van Jing mountain. The nomination and buffer zone are the research areas. On the basis of summarizing the universal value of the natural heritage of the van Jing mountain, through field investigation, literature review, open interview, questionnaire survey and mathematical statistics, this paper analyzes the main threat factors of the protection of the heritage value of the van Jing mountain, and puts forward the Countermeasures of protection and management. The main conclusions are as follows: 1. natural disasters have serious threat to the protruding universal value protection of the van Jing mountain. It is necessary to pay attention to and strengthen the monitoring. According to the different disaster factors, this paper classifies the natural disasters of the van Jing mountain into geological disasters, meteorological and hydrological disasters as well as biological disasters, and describes the landscape resources, biological resources and other exposure to the cause of disaster. A comprehensive analysis of the characteristics of GPS location, frequency and its formation background, the universality of space-time distribution, complex diversity and other characteristics of the existing disaster points found that natural disasters are threatening the unreasonable human activities of the van Jing mountain to highlight the universal value of.2. in different ways. It has become a major threat to the protection of the universal value of van Jing mountain. Infrastructure construction has blocked biological channels and corridors to a certain extent, separates the ecological links and causes pressure on the protection of the outstanding universal value of the study area. The unordered development of tourism resources is an important way of the self landscape and wild animal and plant habitat of the van Jing mountain. The specific effects include the continuous growth of tourists, the uneven distribution of tourists' behavior, the decline in the quality of tourism ecological environment, the increasingly prominent tourism waste, and the difficult coordination of tourism development and management and the protection of resources. The use of traditional resources such as animal husbandry, firewood collection and other traditional resources occupies an important position. These disturbances are difficult to eliminate in a short period of time and even continue to exist. The key to further protection of the universal value of the van Jing mountain is the key to further protection of the universal value of the van Jing mountain. The dependence of the natural resources of the community and the factors affecting the natural resources of the community. The analysis shows that the overall level of natural resource dependence of farmers is higher, among which, the dependence on income is 29.86%, the dependence of 14.52% farmers on natural resources is above 90%, the dependence on energy is 58.24%, there is no obvious difference, and firewood is the demand of rigid resources of farmers. Degree, the level of family lending has a significant influence on the natural resource dependence of farmers. On the basis of in-depth analysis of the composition and threat of the prominent universal value in the study area,.4. paper makes a contrastive study of the management experience of the same types of heritage sites in China, and puts forward some relevant countermeasures and suggestions. Harm risk, strictly control infrastructure construction, deepen tourism management, rationally develop ecotourism, attach importance to community development demands and improve community management model. From the perspective of management effectiveness, it suggests that management departments carry out targeted species protection, construct co management mechanism of Fan Jing mountain and Yangxi protection area, and timely compile "van Jing mountain". Protection management plan, to improve the management level and efficiency.
【學位授予單位】:貴州師范大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:F592.7
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳志軍;徐飛雄;劉嘉毅;;世界自然遺產(chǎn)地旅游發(fā)展與遺產(chǎn)保護協(xié)調(diào)的戰(zhàn)略管理研究——基于]\0山的實證分析[J];中南林業(yè)科技大學學報(社會科學版);2016年06期
2 段偉;任艷梅;馮冀;溫亞利;;基于生計資本的農(nóng)戶自然資源依賴研究——以湖北省保護區(qū)為例[J];農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟問題;2015年08期
3 王昭國;楊兆萍;韓芳;欒福明;李東;段祖亮;;中國世界遺產(chǎn)安全格局的時空演變及威脅因素分析[J];干旱區(qū)地理;2015年04期
4 張明;張寒梅;;梵凈山生態(tài)文明建設(shè)與旅游開發(fā)研究[J];廣西民族大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2015年01期
5 王昌海;;農(nóng)戶生態(tài)保護態(tài)度:新發(fā)現(xiàn)與政策啟示[J];管理世界;2014年11期
6 汪源林;李小龍;劉純青;;三清山世界自然遺產(chǎn)地的可持續(xù)發(fā)展[J];中國園林;2014年11期
7 倪曉嬌;南穎;朱衛(wèi)紅;崔允秀;劉國明;劉辰;姚闊;;基于多災種自然災害風險的長白山地區(qū)生態(tài)安全綜合評價[J];地理研究;2014年07期
8 潘運偉;楊明;劉海龍;;瀕危世界遺產(chǎn)威脅因素分析與中國世界遺產(chǎn)保護對策[J];人文地理;2014年01期
9 王金蓮;胡善風;劉安平;張俊香;;黃山風景區(qū)旅游氣象災害防御系統(tǒng)探析——以雷電監(jiān)測預警系統(tǒng)為例[J];地理科學;2014年01期
10 趙廣華;田瑜;唐志堯;李俊生;曾輝;;中國國家級陸地自然保護區(qū)分布及其與人類活動和自然環(huán)境的關(guān)系[J];生物多樣性;2013年06期
相關(guān)博士學位論文 前6條
1 段偉;保護區(qū)生物多樣性保護與農(nóng)戶生計協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展研究[D];北京林業(yè)大學;2016年
2 潘景璐;基于生境壓力的發(fā)展對秦嶺生物多樣性保護影響研究[D];北京林業(yè)大學;2013年
3 宋莎;基于自然資源依賴的秦嶺大熊貓棲息地社區(qū)發(fā)展研究[D];北京林業(yè)大學;2013年
4 史晨暄;世界遺產(chǎn)“突出的普遍價值”評價標準的演變[D];清華大學;2008年
5 覃京燕;文化遺產(chǎn)保護中的信息可視化設(shè)計方法研究[D];清華大學;2006年
6 李華明;中國“世界自然遺產(chǎn)”可持續(xù)利用法律保護對策研究[D];中央民族大學;2006年
相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前6條
1 鄒味蓮;有關(guān)自然保護區(qū)的公路建設(shè)項目生態(tài)環(huán)境影響研究[D];西南交通大學;2013年
2 于維墨;世界自然遺產(chǎn)價值及可持續(xù)發(fā)展探析[D];中國地質(zhì)大學(北京);2012年
3 趙艷;關(guān)于杭州西湖“后申遺時代”保護管理的若干思考[D];華東政法大學;2011年
4 崔健;世界自然遺產(chǎn)資源保護與開發(fā)的中外比較研究[D];南京理工大學;2011年
5 彭嬌婷;林緣社區(qū)森林依賴度評估研究[D];貴州師范大學;2007年
6 何菲菲;世界遺產(chǎn)地的保護與旅游開發(fā)共生研究[D];福建師范大學;2007年
,本文編號:1898088
本文鏈接:http://lk138.cn/wenyilunwen/huanjingshejilunwen/1898088.html