改革開放以來我國意識形態(tài)話語權(quán)問題研究
發(fā)布時間:2018-03-20 14:04
本文選題:意識形態(tài)話語權(quán) 切入點(diǎn):理論基礎(chǔ) 出處:《南開大學(xué)》2014年博士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文
【摘要】:作為哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)領(lǐng)域最難把握的概念之一,意識形態(tài)總是與理論與實(shí)踐、價值與理性、維護(hù)與批判等多維度地交織在一起,關(guān)乎政黨的前途命運(yùn)、國家的長治久安、民族的凝聚力和向心力。在社會主義革命、建設(shè)和改革發(fā)展的過程中,“意識形態(tài)建設(shè)”從來都是一個關(guān)系黨和國家全局、并被高度重視的重大理論和實(shí)踐問題。新中國成立六十多年來,意識形態(tài)宣傳和教育工作的對象、范圍、方式、載體和環(huán)節(jié)均發(fā)生了很大變化,但意識形態(tài)工作的根本任務(wù)和根本目標(biāo)沒有變,也不能變。習(xí)近平總書記在2013年8月19日全國宣傳思想工作會議上對意識形態(tài)工作的重要地位和作用作了深刻闡述,強(qiáng)調(diào)經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)是黨的中心工作,意識形態(tài)工作是黨的一項(xiàng)極端重要的工作。以往的歷史經(jīng)驗(yàn)表明,強(qiáng)大的意識形態(tài)力量是穩(wěn)定社會、凝聚民心和保障發(fā)展的“助推器”,對整個國家和社會具有根本性、全局性和戰(zhàn)略性的重要意義,而牢牢掌握意識形態(tài)話語權(quán)則是真正發(fā)揮主流意識形態(tài)引領(lǐng)—提升功能、解釋—改造功能、整合—凝聚功能、維護(hù)—批判功能,在新的歷史條件下做好意識形態(tài)工作的基本要求。 本文以馬克思主義意識形態(tài)理論為指導(dǎo),將中國改革開放以來社會主義建設(shè)和改革運(yùn)動的實(shí)踐進(jìn)程作為宏大的歷史背景,將意識形態(tài)建設(shè)這一實(shí)踐活動本身作為考察對象,對改革開放以來我國意識形態(tài)話語權(quán)演變的實(shí)踐歷程、基本走向和產(chǎn)生動因進(jìn)行了嘗試性考察和分析,重點(diǎn)分析了改革開放以來我國意識形態(tài)話語權(quán)面臨的國際、國內(nèi)挑戰(zhàn)以及自身存在的話語局限,最后嘗試性地提出我國建構(gòu)意識形態(tài)話語權(quán)的相應(yīng)對策和解決路徑,從而在歷史動態(tài)中把握改革開放以來我國意識形態(tài)話語權(quán)建設(shè)的整體態(tài)勢和運(yùn)作邏輯。 首先,對中國特色社會主義建設(shè)和改革進(jìn)程中的意識形態(tài)話語權(quán)建設(shè)的基本理論問題予以厘清和概括。這一部分的內(nèi)容主要集中在本文第一、二章。弄清概念和內(nèi)涵本身是進(jìn)行問題研究的邏輯前提。意識形態(tài)話語權(quán)問題的研究離不開三個基本概念,即“意識形態(tài)”、“話語權(quán)”以及“意識形態(tài)話語權(quán)”。對意識形態(tài)和意識形態(tài)話語權(quán)基本內(nèi)涵的深入挖掘,對意識形態(tài)話語權(quán)與其他主要話語權(quán)類型關(guān)系的認(rèn)識厘清,可以幫助我們更好地理解意識形態(tài)話語權(quán)問題。本文將“意識形態(tài)話語權(quán)”問題視作一種國際現(xiàn)象和世界運(yùn)動,探究“意識形態(tài)話語權(quán)”在西方學(xué)者視野中的理解和認(rèn)識,從馬克思主義經(jīng)典作家的論述中追溯“意識形態(tài)話語權(quán)”的哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)和理論淵源,并從對理論的認(rèn)真梳理和全面分析中把握中國共產(chǎn)黨語境中“意識形態(tài)話語權(quán)”的本質(zhì)屬性。 其次,對改革開放以來我國意識形態(tài)話語權(quán)演變的整體態(tài)勢進(jìn)行梳理和分析。改革開放以來,隨著社會主義建設(shè)和改革的進(jìn)程不斷加快,意識形態(tài)話語權(quán)的構(gòu)成要素,即話語主體、話語主題和話語載體也發(fā)生了歷史性的變革。文章對馬克思主義意識形態(tài)話語權(quán)在中國的歷史演進(jìn)作了整體概括,接著從話語“身份門檻”的變遷、新媒介開啟新的話語平臺、話語的強(qiáng)制性色彩走向淡化、話語方式的“流行語”特征漸顯等四個方面分析了改革開放以來我國意識形態(tài)話語權(quán)演變的具體表現(xiàn),然后將這種演變歸因于社會結(jié)構(gòu)和社會關(guān)系的深刻變化、市場經(jīng)濟(jì)的大力推進(jìn)與利益格局的劇烈分化、傳統(tǒng)觀念的迅速瓦解與文化價值的多元共存等。 再次,對改革開放以來我國意識形態(tài)話語權(quán)面臨的話語挑戰(zhàn)進(jìn)行分析和判斷。從國際來看,國際共運(yùn)低潮給馬克思主義帶來的污蔑與非難、全球化背景下的西方話語霸權(quán)、信息化時代西方網(wǎng)絡(luò)意識形態(tài)話語攻勢等都是西方試圖對我國進(jìn)行全方位、多層次、多角度意識形態(tài)侵略與滲透,企圖動搖我國民眾的馬克思主義信仰和社會主義信念,消解馬克思主義意識形態(tài)影響力、凝聚力和向心力的重要策略和手段。從國內(nèi)看,各種非主流話語、多樣化社會思潮、消解馬克思主義的多種錯誤傾向等嚴(yán)重?cái)D壓著馬克思主義的話語空間,使馬克思主義話語面臨式微和弱化的危險。馬克思主義話語優(yōu)勢與社會主義現(xiàn)實(shí)形態(tài)的客觀差距、馬克思主義話語議程設(shè)置的欠合理性以及話語表達(dá)本身存在的困難等都是我國意識形態(tài)話語權(quán)存在的自身局限,嚴(yán)重影響了馬克思主義在人們心目中的形象和地位,使馬克思主義意識形態(tài)社會整合功能的發(fā)揮受到極大限制。 然后,在清醒認(rèn)識建構(gòu)我國意識形態(tài)話語權(quán)重要性的基礎(chǔ)上,提出對話與堅(jiān)守、繼承與創(chuàng)新、包容與批判三個建構(gòu)意識形態(tài)話語權(quán)必須堅(jiān)持的基本原則。 最后,嘗試性地對當(dāng)前我國建構(gòu)意識形態(tài)話語權(quán)提出相應(yīng)的解決對策。這一章是本文的落腳點(diǎn)和歸宿。在對當(dāng)前我國意識形態(tài)話語權(quán)主要特點(diǎn)的概括總結(jié)基礎(chǔ)上,闡明中國共產(chǎn)黨的理論自覺,即學(xué)習(xí)、運(yùn)用和發(fā)展馬克思主義意識形態(tài)理論的自覺性在建構(gòu)意識形態(tài)話語權(quán)中的地位和作用,然后從關(guān)注話語主體、設(shè)置話語主題、創(chuàng)新話語載體等方面提出具體的應(yīng)對路徑。
[Abstract]:As one of the field of philosophy and social sciences is the most difficult to grasp the concept of ideology, always with theory and practice, value and rationality, maintenance and critical dimensions are intertwined, about the fate of the party, the national long period of stability, national cohesion and centripetal force. In the process of socialist revolution, construction and reform and development. "The ideological construction is never a relationship between the party and the country as a whole, the major theoretical and practical issues and is highly valued. The new Chinese was founded more than 60 years ago, the object of ideology, publicity and education work scope, mode, carrier and links are changed, but the fundamental task and goal of ideological work has not changed that can not be changed. The important status and role of the ideological work of general secretary Xi Jinping in the August 19, 2013 National Conference on propaganda work were expounded, strong Adjustment of economic construction is the central task of the party, ideological work is extremely important for the work of the party. Past historical experience shows that a powerful ideology is to stabilize the social cohesion, and guarantee the development of the "booster" is fundamental to the whole country and society, the important significance of overall and strategic, and firmly master of ideological discourse is really play a leading and promoting function of the mainstream ideology, explain the transformation function, integration, cohesion function, maintenance of critical function, basic requirements of ideological work in the new historical conditions.
This paper takes Marx's theory as the guiding ideology, the practice process of the socialist construction and reform movement since the reform and opening up as Chinese grand historical background, ideological construction of the practice itself as the object of study, the practice course in China since reform and opening up the ideological discourse of evolution, the basic trend of the attempt to investigate and and the analysis of the causes, analyzes the face of ideological discourse since the reform and opening up of China's international and domestic challenges and limitations of discourse itself, finally try to put forward the corresponding countermeasures of China's construction of ideological discourse and solution path, since the reform and opening up in history so as to grasp the dynamic in the general situation of China ideology construction the logic and operation.
First of all, to clarify and generalize the basic theoretical problems on the construction of the right ideology Chinese socialist construction and Reform in the process. The content of this part is mainly concentrated in the first, second chapter. Clarify the concept and connotation of itself is the logic premise of research. Research on the issues of ideology discourse cannot do without three basic concepts. "Ideology", "Discourse" and "ideology discourse". Exploring the ideology and ideological discourse connotation, understanding of the relationship between ideological discourse and other major discourse types to clarify, can help us better understand the ideology discourse. This paper will be the problem of ideological discourse "as a an international phenomenon and the movement of the world, explore the" ideology "in the view of western scholars in understanding and understanding, From the perspective of Marx's classical writers, he traced the philosophical basis and theoretical origin of "ideological discourse power", and grasped the essential attributes of "ideological discourse power" in the context of Chinese Communist Party from the careful combing and comprehensive analysis of the theory.
Secondly, analyzing the overall situation of ideological discourse evolution of our country since the reform and opening up. Since the reform and opening up, with the socialist construction and the reform process continues to accelerate, the elements of ideological discourse, namely the subject of discourse, discourse theme and discourse carrier has undergone historic changes. This paper makes an overall summary the historical evolution of Marx ideology discourse in Chinese, then from the change of discourse identity threshold ", the new media to open a new discourse platform, mandatory discourse to fade, four aspects of the word" buzzwords "feature analysis of specific performance in ideological discourse evolution of our country reform and opening up since then, due to the profound changes in the evolution of social structure and social relations, and vigorously promote the pattern of interests differentiation intense market economy, The rapid disintegration of traditional ideas and multicultural coexistence of cultural values.
Thirdly, to analyze and judge the ideology since the reform and opening up facing China's right of discourse. The challenge from the international point of view, slander and non tide of international communist movement brought to the Marx doctrine, the western discourse hegemony under the background of globalization, the information network era of the western ideology discourse are offensive western attempts to carry out a full range, to me in the multi-level, multi angle aggression ideology and penetration, trying to undermine our people's Marx's belief and belief in socialism, Marx digestion ideology influence, an important strategy and means of cohesion and centripetal force. From a domestic perspective, a variety of non mainstream discourse, diversified social thought, Marx's many kinds of error prone digestion and other serious extrusion Marx's discourse space, Marx's discourse in danger of decline and weaken. Marx's discourse advantage The gap between reality and objective of socialism, Marx's discourse under the agenda setting rationality and discourse itself and difficulties are the ideological discourse right of China's own limitations, seriously affected the image of the Marx doctrine and in the minds of people who play the Marx ideology social integration function is limited.
Then, on the basis of conscious understanding of the importance of constructing ideological discourse power in our country, we put forward three basic principles of dialogue and persistence, inheritance and innovation, tolerance and criticism.
Finally, try to construct China's current ideological discourse and put forward the corresponding countermeasures. This chapter is the starting point and destination. The main features of the current ideological discourse right in China summed up on the basis of the theory of the Communist Party of Chinese consciously clarified, namely learning, role consciousness of application and development Marx's theory of ideology in ideological discourse, and then from the subject of discourse, discourse theme settings, the proposed deal with the specific path of innovative discourse carrier and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:南開大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號】:D64
,
本文編號:1639400
本文鏈接:http://www.lk138.cn/sizhenglunwen/1639400.html
最近更新
教材專著