發(fā)布時間：2018-06-25 06:55

  本文選題：利他水平 + 第三方評價��； 參考：《浙江大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：目前對第三方評價研究主要涉及自利行為如第三方懲罰和補償,而較少涉及對利他行為的評價。不僅如此,對于利他行為的第三方評價研究主要關(guān)注第三方對個體從事利他行為與否的評價,而忽略了對不同利他水平的利他者評價。基于此,本研究以利他行為為切入點,探討在不同利他水平下,第三方對利他者的道德評價及其機制。在此基礎(chǔ)上,研究還將權(quán)力關(guān)系引入第三方評價研究中,探討權(quán)力對個體利他行為和第三方評價關(guān)系中的調(diào)節(jié)作用及其可能機制。研究一包括3項實驗,分別在資源獲取和損失情境中探討了不同水平的利他行為(公平、輕度/中度/高度利他)與第三方對個體道德評價的關(guān)系。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),利他程度與第三方對利他者的道德評價之間存在負(fù)向關(guān)系,隨著利他程度的上升,第三方對利他者的道德評價呈逐步下降趨勢。研究一還發(fā)現(xiàn),第三方感知的印象管理動機是該現(xiàn)象的中介機制,個體利他程度的上升導(dǎo)致第三方感知到更高水平的印象管理動機,從而降低了個體對其的道德評價。研究二包括3項實驗,探討在不同權(quán)力關(guān)系下,利他水平與第三方對個體道德評價之間的關(guān)系。實驗2a和2b分別在資源獲取和損失情境下發(fā)現(xiàn),權(quán)力對利他評價的下降趨勢存在緩沖效應(yīng),隨著利他水平的提高,第三方對高權(quán)者的道德評價優(yōu)于平權(quán)者。研究2c進(jìn)一步探討了權(quán)力距離在利他水平與第三方道德評價關(guān)系中的調(diào)節(jié)作用。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),權(quán)力距離和權(quán)力的交互作用顯著,權(quán)力距離水平低的個體對高權(quán)力利他者的道德評價優(yōu)于平權(quán)力者,而權(quán)力距離水平高的被試對高權(quán)者和平權(quán)者利他行為的道德評價差異不顯著。本研究表明,利他與第三方對利他者的道德評價之間存在負(fù)向關(guān)系,且感知的印象管理動機在二者關(guān)系中起中介作用。此外,權(quán)力緩沖了第三方對個體利他行為的評價逐步下降的趨勢,且這一效應(yīng)受到評價者的權(quán)力距離的反向調(diào)節(jié)。最后探討了本研究的價值、不足以及未來的發(fā)展方向。
[Abstract]:At present, the research on third party evaluation mainly involves self-interest, such as punishment and compensation of third party, but less on evaluation of altruistic behavior. Moreover, the third party evaluation of altruistic behavior focuses on the third party's evaluation of individual altruistic behavior, while neglecting the altruistic evaluation of different altruistic levels. Based on this, this study explores the moral evaluation and mechanism of altruism by third parties at different altruistic levels. On this basis, the study also introduces the power relationship into the third-party evaluation study, and discusses the regulatory role of power in individual altruistic behavior and third-party evaluation relationship and its possible mechanism. In the first study, three experiments were conducted to explore the relationship between different levels of altruistic behavior (fair, mild / moderate / high altruism) and individual moral evaluation by third parties in resource acquisition and loss scenarios. It is found that there is a negative relationship between the degree of altruism and the moral evaluation of altruists by third parties. With the increase of altruistic degree, the moral evaluation of altruists by third parties gradually decreases. The first study also found that the third party perception of impression management motivation is the intermediary mechanism of this phenomenon. The rise of individual altruism leads to the third party perception of a higher level of impression management motivation which reduces the individual moral evaluation. The second study includes three experiments to explore the relationship between altruistic level and individual moral evaluation by third parties under different power relations. Experiment 2a and 2b found that there was a buffer effect on the downward trend of altruistic evaluation by power under the situation of resource acquisition and loss respectively. With the increase of altruism level, the third party's moral evaluation of the high power was superior to that of the equal. Study 2C further explores the role of power distance in the relationship between altruism and third party moral evaluation. It is found that the interaction between power distance and power is significant, and that individuals with low power distance level have better moral evaluation of high-power altruists than those with equal power. However, there was no significant difference in the moral evaluation of altruistic behavior of those with higher power distance. This study shows that there is a negative relationship between altruism and the third party's moral evaluation of altruism, and perceived impression management motivation plays an intermediary role in the relationship. In addition, power buffers the downward trend of the third party's evaluation of individual altruistic behavior, and this effect is reversed by the power distance of the evaluator. Finally, the value, deficiency and future development of this study are discussed.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B848

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 陸欣欣;孫嘉卿;;領(lǐng)導(dǎo)-成員交換與情緒枯竭:互惠信念和權(quán)力距離導(dǎo)向的作用[J];心理學(xué)報;2016年05期

2 梅哲群;楊百寅;金山;;領(lǐng)導(dǎo)-成員交換對組織主人翁行為及工作績效的影響機制研究[J];管理學(xué)報;2014年05期

3 崔璨;時雨;邱孝一;時勘;;應(yīng)聘者印象管理研究進(jìn)展[J];心理與行為研究;2013年05期

4 魏秋江;段錦云;范庭衛(wèi);;權(quán)力操作范式的分析與比較[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2012年09期

5 溫忠麟,.張雷,侯杰泰,劉紅云;中介效應(yīng)檢驗程序及其應(yīng)用[J];心理學(xué)報;2004年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉娟娟;大學(xué)生的印象管理及其影響因素研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號：2065058