本文選題：互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融　切入點：風險傳導機制　出處：《北方工業(yè)大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來,第三方支付等互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融發(fā)展迅速,在模式和技術(shù)上不斷創(chuàng)新,成為當今各界的熱門關(guān)注點。政府工作報告多次提及互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融,可見互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融的地位和影響正不斷擴大。本文通過文獻綜述,梳理出互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融風險傳導機制及監(jiān)管問題的研究思路。首先,本文采用資本互動機制,從資金流向和流量角度,對傳統(tǒng)金融和互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融的潛在風險及傳導路徑進行研究,構(gòu)建風險傳導機制。對于互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融,又從整體和各模式角度進行了具體分析。其次,本文從防止風險發(fā)生和防止風險傳導兩個維度,對互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融監(jiān)管問題進行研究,防止風險發(fā)生維度,采用功能監(jiān)管的概念,即行為監(jiān)管、審慎監(jiān)管和消費者保護。行為監(jiān)管構(gòu)建了監(jiān)管部門和互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融企業(yè)的演化動態(tài)博弈,認為加大依法創(chuàng)新的收益、加大懲罰力度是監(jiān)管部門應(yīng)采取的合理選擇,監(jiān)管部門可根據(jù)動態(tài)演化相位圖,結(jié)合具體情況動態(tài)地調(diào)整策略,對創(chuàng)新激勵與違規(guī)懲罰設(shè)定合理的額度。審慎監(jiān)管重點關(guān)注風險監(jiān)察,構(gòu)建了一套風險防控引擎。防止風險傳導維度,結(jié)合傳導機制,就各個路徑給出合理監(jiān)管建議,如建立信息共享機制、成立風險應(yīng)急基金、交易數(shù)據(jù)備案、單一銀行托管等。最后,本文列舉了京東金融風控體系和e租寶事件兩個案例,證明風險防控引擎和風險傳導機制及監(jiān)管措施的合理性。
[Abstract]:In recent years, Internet finance, such as third-party payment, has developed rapidly, and has been constantly innovating in mode and technology, which has become a hot concern of all circles. The government work report has mentioned Internet finance many times. It is obvious that the status and influence of Internet finance is expanding. Through literature review, this paper combs out the research ideas of Internet financial risk transmission mechanism and supervision. First, this paper adopts the mechanism of capital interaction. From the angle of capital flow and flow, this paper studies the potential risks and transmission paths of traditional finance and Internet finance, and constructs the risk transmission mechanism. From the two dimensions of preventing risk from occurring and preventing risk transmission, this paper studies the problem of Internet financial supervision, and adopts the concept of functional supervision, that is, behavioral supervision, to prevent the occurrence of risk. Prudential supervision and consumer protection. The behavior supervision has constructed the evolutionary dynamic game between the supervision department and the Internet financial enterprise. It is considered that the reasonable choice should be taken by the supervision department to increase the profit of innovation according to law and the intensity of punishment. According to the dynamic evolution phase diagram, the regulatory department can dynamically adjust the strategy according to the specific situation, and set a reasonable amount of innovation incentive and penalty for violation. Prudential supervision focuses on risk supervision. A set of risk prevention and control engine is constructed. The dimension of preventing risk transmission, combined with transmission mechanism, gives reasonable supervision suggestions on each path, such as establishing information sharing mechanism, setting up risk emergency fund, recording transaction data. Finally, this paper enumerates two cases of JingDong's financial risk control system and e-zubo event, which proves the rationality of risk prevention and control engine, risk transmission mechanism and supervision measures.
【學位授予單位】：北方工業(yè)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F724.6;F832.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王澤安;;金融風險傳導渠道[J];時代金融;2015年26期

2 張原;朱夢昕;;開放條件下金融風險傳導:條件、路徑與機制[J];財會通訊;2015年02期

3 謝平;鄒傳偉;劉海二;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融監(jiān)管的必要性與核心原則[J];國際金融研究;2014年08期

4 李淼焱;呂蓮菊;;我國互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融風險現(xiàn)狀及監(jiān)管策略[J];經(jīng)濟縱橫;2014年08期

5 胡劍波;丁子格;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融監(jiān)管的國際經(jīng)驗及啟示[J];經(jīng)濟縱橫;2014年08期

6 曹東;曹巍;吳俊龍;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)時代金融創(chuàng)新與監(jiān)管的博弈研究[J];東南大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2014年04期

7 程華;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融的雙邊市場競爭及其監(jiān)管體系催生[J];改革;2014年07期

8 柴珂楠;蔡榮成;;美國P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸監(jiān)管模式的發(fā)展狀況及對中國的啟示[J];西南金融;2014年07期

9 徐慶煒;張曉鋒;;從本質(zhì)特征看互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融的風險與監(jiān)管[J];金融理論與實踐;2014年07期

10 魏鵬;;中國互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融的風險與監(jiān)管研究[J];金融論壇;2014年07期

，

本文編號：1661855