發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-21 00:10

  本文選題：TPP　切入點(diǎn)：APEC　出處：《鄭州大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：金融危機(jī)發(fā)生之后,美國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退。然而,與美國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退的狀況截然不同的是亞太地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)迅速持續(xù)的發(fā)展。美國(guó)為了促進(jìn)其經(jīng)濟(jì)再度發(fā)展,于2009年高調(diào)地宣布其要加入由新加坡、智利、文萊、新西蘭建立的跨太平洋戰(zhàn)略經(jīng)濟(jì)伙伴關(guān)系協(xié)定(即TPP)的談判中。美國(guó)加入TPP談判后很快便處于主導(dǎo)地位,并積極主動(dòng)游說(shuō)其他國(guó)家或地區(qū)加入談判。目前TPP已進(jìn)行了十八輪的談判,在不斷取得進(jìn)展的同時(shí)逐步擴(kuò)大其影響力。至今,TPP尚未出臺(tái)正式的文本,但就2010年曾公布的綱要文件來(lái)看,TPP協(xié)定兼具涉及空間的廣闊性、內(nèi)容的高標(biāo)準(zhǔn)性、加入機(jī)制的開(kāi)放性及貿(mào)易高度自由化等特征。這些特征使亞太地區(qū)許多國(guó)家面對(duì)TPP趨之若鶩又因其高標(biāo)準(zhǔn)望而卻步。目前,TPP有12個(gè)成員國(guó),這些成員并不限于亞太國(guó)家。然而,身為APEC(亞太經(jīng)濟(jì)合作組織,Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation,簡(jiǎn)稱(chēng)APEC)的重要成員、亞洲經(jīng)濟(jì)大國(guó)的中國(guó)卻沒(méi)有收到邀請(qǐng)加入談判。TPP的發(fā)展和實(shí)施,將對(duì)亞太地區(qū)甚至世界各國(guó)家或者組織的國(guó)際間的貿(mào)易合作帶來(lái)影響。TPP成員間貿(mào)易零關(guān)稅的絕對(duì)優(yōu)惠,將最大程度促進(jìn)成員間經(jīng)濟(jì)合作,增加貿(mào)易數(shù)量,提高在國(guó)際貿(mào)易市場(chǎng)上的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力。這是貿(mào)易轉(zhuǎn)移效應(yīng)給TPP內(nèi)成員帶來(lái)的良好效果。而非TPP成員的國(guó)家或地區(qū)將錯(cuò)失和區(qū)域內(nèi)國(guó)家進(jìn)行貿(mào)易機(jī)會(huì),進(jìn)而影響本國(guó)進(jìn)出口貿(mào)易數(shù)額和收益。中國(guó)未接到TPP邀請(qǐng),也未表示要加入TPP談判,作為非TPP成員國(guó)的中國(guó),也面臨著上述貿(mào)易轉(zhuǎn)移效應(yīng)對(duì)本國(guó)涉外貿(mào)易帶來(lái)的影響,因此如何緩解甚至消除TPP對(duì)我國(guó)涉外貿(mào)易的沖擊和影響,也是我國(guó)政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、法律界研究的重要問(wèn)題。本文通過(guò)對(duì)TPP的發(fā)展和特征加以論述,同時(shí)對(duì)TPP主要議題列舉討論,并將其與APEC、WTO作比較研究從而進(jìn)一步了解TPP的走向,在此基礎(chǔ)上探討TPP對(duì)中國(guó)涉外貿(mào)易的影響,進(jìn)而提出符合中國(guó)國(guó)情的法律應(yīng)對(duì)對(duì)策,即密切關(guān)注并研究TPP規(guī)則,不斷推進(jìn)本國(guó)與亞太地區(qū)及其他國(guó)家FTA(自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定Free Trade Agreement)進(jìn)程,促進(jìn)RCEP(區(qū)域全面經(jīng)濟(jì)伙伴關(guān)系Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership)的發(fā)展,完善國(guó)內(nèi)法律配置,提高本國(guó)勞工與環(huán)境標(biāo)準(zhǔn),提高本國(guó)實(shí)力,進(jìn)而從容應(yīng)對(duì)TPP帶來(lái)的影響和挑戰(zhàn)。
[Abstract]:After the financial crisis, the United States recession. However, unlike the recession in the United States is the rapid and sustained economic development of the Asia-Pacific region. In 2009, he made a high-profile announcement of his intention to join the negotiations on the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement established by Singapore, Chile, Brunei, and New Zealand. The United States soon became dominant after joining the TPP negotiations. And actively lobbied other countries or regions to join the negotiations. At present, the TPP has carried out 18 rounds of negotiations to expand its influence while making continuous progress. However, from the outline document published on 2010, we can see that the TPP agreement has a broad space and a high standard of content. The openness of the accession mechanism and the high degree of trade liberalization have made many countries in the Asia-Pacific region scramble to face the TPP and have been deterred by its high standards. At present, the TPP has 12 members, and these members are not limited to Asia-Pacific countries. As an important member of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), China, a major Asian economic power, has not been invited to join the negotiations on the development and implementation of the TPP. It will have an impact on international trade cooperation in the Asia-Pacific region and even among countries or organizations around the world. The absolute preference for zero tariffs on trade among TPP members will maximize economic cooperation among members and increase the volume of trade. Improve competitiveness in the international trade market. This is a good result of the trade transfer effect on the members of the TPP. Countries or regions that are not members of the TPP will miss out on trading opportunities with the countries in the region. China has not received an invitation from the TPP and has not indicated that it will join the TPP negotiations. As a non-member of the TPP, China is also faced with the impact of the above-mentioned trade transfer effects on its foreign trade. Therefore, how to alleviate and even eliminate the impact and influence of TPP on China's foreign trade is also an important issue in the political, economic and legal fields of our country. This paper discusses the development and characteristics of TPP and discusses the main topics of TPP. In order to further understand the trend of TPP, this paper discusses the influence of TPP on China's foreign trade, and then puts forward legal countermeasures according to China's national conditions, that is, paying close attention to and studying the rules of TPP. To continuously advance the process of Free Trade agreements (FTAs) between our country and the Asia-Pacific region and other countries, promote the development of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, improve domestic legal allocation, and raise domestic labour and environmental standards, Improve the strength of the country, and then calmly deal with the impact and challenges brought about by TPP.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F744;F752

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 萬(wàn)璐;;美國(guó)TPP戰(zhàn)略的經(jīng)濟(jì)效應(yīng)研究——基于GTAP模擬的分析[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2011年04期

2 沈銘輝;;跨太平洋伙伴關(guān)系協(xié)議(TPP)的成本收益分析:中國(guó)的視角[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2012年01期

3 陸建人;;美國(guó)加入TPP的動(dòng)因分析[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問(wèn)題;2011年01期

4 趙晉平;;泛太平洋伙伴關(guān)系協(xié)定與中國(guó)的自貿(mào)區(qū)戰(zhàn)略[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;2011年04期

5 杜蘭;;美國(guó)力推跨太平洋伙伴關(guān)系戰(zhàn)略論析[J];國(guó)際問(wèn)題研究;2011年01期

6 ;TPP Reflects the United States' Asia Complex[J];International Understanding;2011年01期

7 薛榮久;楊鳳鳴;;跨太平洋伙伴關(guān)系協(xié)定的特點(diǎn)、困境與結(jié)局[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;2013年05期

8 劉欣;;TPP國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)的比較性分析及影響研究[J];世界貿(mào)易組織動(dòng)態(tài)與研究;2013年03期

9 全毅;;TPP對(duì)東亞區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)合作的影響:中美對(duì)話(huà)語(yǔ)權(quán)的爭(zhēng)奪[J];亞太經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年05期

10 顧靜;;TPP對(duì)兩岸關(guān)系的影響芻議[J];亞太經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1641404