發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-20 21:37

  本文選題：金磚四國(guó)　切入點(diǎn)：貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)　出處：《安徽財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：作為新興經(jīng)濟(jì)體的代表,巴西、印度、俄羅斯和中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展飛速令世人矚目,其中,對(duì)外貿(mào)易對(duì)金磚四國(guó)的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展起著非常重要的作用。近年來(lái),金磚四國(guó)的貿(mào)易規(guī)模、商品結(jié)構(gòu)、貿(mào)易伙伴等都有很大的變化,本文在此背景下對(duì)金磚四國(guó)的貿(mào)易技術(shù)結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行詳細(xì)的分析。 金磚四國(guó)有著不同貿(mào)易技術(shù)結(jié)構(gòu),本文第二章從出口商品貿(mào)易技術(shù)結(jié)構(gòu)、主要貿(mào)易伙伴等角度對(duì)金磚四國(guó)的出口商品貿(mào)易技術(shù)結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)：金磚四國(guó)主要出口資源型或勞動(dòng)密集型產(chǎn)品,出口市場(chǎng)主要集中在美國(guó)、歐盟等發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家。 在分析金磚四國(guó)各自的商品貿(mào)易技術(shù)結(jié)構(gòu)之后,本文第三章借鑒杜修立、王維國(guó)(2007)對(duì)技術(shù)含量的計(jì)算方法,選取2000-2012年相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù),通過(guò)考察四國(guó)SITC三位碼水平下的260種產(chǎn)品的技術(shù)含量,并在此基礎(chǔ)上構(gòu)建出口商品技術(shù)含量分布圖,從橫向和縱向兩個(gè)角度對(duì)金磚四國(guó)出口品技術(shù)含量進(jìn)行比較分析,得出：雖然金磚四國(guó)貿(mào)易發(fā)展迅速,但四國(guó)出口貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)不優(yōu),出口品技術(shù)含量不高,其中巴西和俄羅斯以出口資源密集型產(chǎn)品為主,印度以出口勞動(dòng)密集型產(chǎn)品為主,中國(guó)出口商品技術(shù)結(jié)構(gòu)相對(duì)優(yōu)化,但整體上仍是以出口中低技術(shù)含量產(chǎn)品為主。 分析了四國(guó)的貿(mào)易技術(shù)結(jié)構(gòu)以后,本文第四章還計(jì)算了中國(guó)與其他三國(guó)的貿(mào)易競(jìng)爭(zhēng)性和互補(bǔ)性指數(shù)來(lái)分析四國(guó)貿(mào)易技術(shù)結(jié)構(gòu)在國(guó)際市場(chǎng)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)性和互補(bǔ)性,發(fā)現(xiàn)中國(guó)與其他三國(guó)有較強(qiáng)互補(bǔ)性,這給四國(guó)未來(lái)合作發(fā)展奠定基礎(chǔ),此外,與其他三國(guó)對(duì)中國(guó)貿(mào)易技術(shù)結(jié)構(gòu)產(chǎn)生的影響相比,中國(guó)對(duì)其他三國(guó)貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)造成的影響相對(duì)較大,但隨著其他三國(guó)貿(mào)易不斷增長(zhǎng),將給中國(guó)貿(mào)易發(fā)展產(chǎn)生一定影響。 文章結(jié)尾,根據(jù)文中比較分析的相關(guān)結(jié)論,對(duì)我國(guó)出口貿(mào)易技術(shù)結(jié)構(gòu)提出相關(guān)政策建議。
[Abstract]:As a representative of emerging economies, Brazil, India, Russia and China have enjoyed rapid economic growth. Among them, foreign trade has played a very important role in the economic development of the BRIC countries. There are great changes in commodity structure and trading partners. Under this background, this paper makes a detailed analysis of the trade technology structure of BRIC countries. BRICs have different trade technology structure. The second chapter analyzes the technical structure of BRICs' export commodity trade from the perspective of export commodity trade technology structure and main trading partners. The main export market of BRIC countries is in the developed countries such as the United States and the European Union. After analyzing the technical structure of commodity trade among the BRIC countries, the third chapter draws lessons from du Xiuli and Wang Weiguo 2007 to calculate the technology content, and selects the relevant data from 2000 to 2012. By investigating the technical content of 260 kinds of products under the SITC three-digit code level of the four countries, and on the basis of this, the technical content distribution map of the export commodities is constructed, and the technical content of the export products of the BRIC countries is compared and analyzed from the horizontal and vertical angles. It is concluded that although the BRICs trade has developed rapidly, the export structure of the four countries is not excellent, and the technical content of their exports is not high. Among them, Brazil and Russia mainly export resource-intensive products, and India mainly exports labor-intensive products. The technical structure of China's export commodities is relatively optimized, but the overall export of low-and medium-tech products is still the main. After analyzing the trade technology structure of the four countries, chapter 4th also calculates the trade competitiveness and complementary index between China and the other three countries to analyze the competitiveness and complementarity of the four countries' trade technology structure in the international market. It is found that China and other three countries are highly complementary, which lays a foundation for the future development of cooperation among the four countries. In addition, compared with the influence of other three countries on China's trade and technology structure, China has a relatively greater impact on the trade structure of the other three countries. However, with the continuous growth of trade among the other three countries, it will have a certain impact on the development of China's trade. At the end of the article, according to the conclusion of the comparative analysis, the paper puts forward some policy suggestions on the technical structure of China's export trade.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F746.17

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 李麗;邵兵家;陳迅;;中印自由貿(mào)易區(qū)的建立對(duì)中國(guó)及世界經(jīng)濟(jì)影響研究[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2008年02期

2 賀書(shū)鋒;;“金磚四國(guó)”經(jīng)濟(jì)周期互動(dòng)與中國(guó)核心地位——基于SVAR的實(shí)證分析[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2010年04期

3 樊綱;關(guān)志雄;姚枝仲;;國(guó)際貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)分析:貿(mào)易品的技術(shù)分布[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2006年08期

4 杜修立;王維國(guó);;中國(guó)出口貿(mào)易的技術(shù)結(jié)構(gòu)及其變遷:1980—2003[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2007年07期

5 安寶鈞;;金磚國(guó)家競(jìng)爭(zhēng)中尋求互補(bǔ)性合作[J];經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年Z1期

6 李春頂;;中國(guó)與金磚國(guó)家貿(mào)易發(fā)展的前景[J];中國(guó)經(jīng)貿(mào);2013年01期

7 鄧雄;;關(guān)注“金磚四國(guó)”:當(dāng)前發(fā)展動(dòng)向及啟示[J];西南金融;2008年10期

8 董直慶;高春婷;劉雅麗;;我國(guó)出口貿(mào)易技術(shù)水平提升了嗎?[J];山東經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年02期

9 姚洋;章林峰;;中國(guó)本土企業(yè)出口競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)和技術(shù)變遷分析[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1640888