發(fā)布時間：2018-04-22 01:38

  本文選題：業(yè)績評價 + 因子分析��； 參考：《重慶交通大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：企業(yè)業(yè)績評價作為企業(yè)管理的難點之一,向來是管理科學領(lǐng)域研究的熱點問題。建立一套科學合理并且行之有效的企業(yè)經(jīng)營業(yè)績評價體系,能夠?qū)ζ髽I(yè)的經(jīng)營行為起到正確的引導作用,幫助企業(yè)的經(jīng)營管理者尋找企業(yè)的優(yōu)勢和差距,從而使企業(yè)保持優(yōu)勢、縮短差距以提升自身的核心競爭力,實現(xiàn)企業(yè)發(fā)展的戰(zhàn)略性目標。 隨著我國社會主義市場經(jīng)濟體制的實現(xiàn),在經(jīng)濟快速發(fā)展的過程中,房地產(chǎn)行業(yè)的迅猛發(fā)展為我國國民經(jīng)濟建設(shè)添磚加瓦。2008年的金融危機使我國市場環(huán)境變化深刻,政府對于房地產(chǎn)市場的大力調(diào)控使得房地產(chǎn)業(yè)做出了重要的發(fā)展變革,在這樣的背景下,評價我國房地產(chǎn)企業(yè)的業(yè)績水平具有非常重要的現(xiàn)實意義,同時也對整個國民經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展起到了重要的作用。 本文首先對企業(yè)業(yè)績評價的相關(guān)理論進行了梳理,同時對本文所使用的因子分析和EVA這兩種業(yè)績評價方法進行了理論探討。在此基礎(chǔ)上,利用深滬兩市30家房地產(chǎn)企業(yè)2012年的財務(wù)數(shù)據(jù)作為樣本對其進行業(yè)績評價的實證研究。從盈利能力、營運能力、償債能力、發(fā)展能力四個角度篩選符合房地產(chǎn)企業(yè)特點的評價指標,作為因子分析的原始變量指標,文章共得到五個公共因子。然后運用EVA的業(yè)績評價方法,選擇計算的調(diào)整項目,根據(jù)公式計算出各樣本企業(yè)EVA的值,由于考慮到規(guī)模效應(yīng),用EPA (EVA/投入資本總額)對30家房地產(chǎn)企業(yè)進行業(yè)績情況的排名。得到這兩種方法的評價結(jié)果后,運用綜合序數(shù)法判斷二者的相關(guān)度,然后選擇適當?shù)臋?quán)重比例對兩種業(yè)績評價的結(jié)果進行綜合,得到排名結(jié)果。 使用因子分析和EVA相結(jié)合的業(yè)績評價方法不僅可以較為全面的反映出企業(yè)的財務(wù)信息,而且由于考慮了企業(yè)的資本成本,使得評價結(jié)果能夠更為真實地反映出企業(yè)為股東創(chuàng)造出的財富。
[Abstract]:As one of the difficulties in enterprise management, enterprise performance evaluation has always been a hot issue in the field of management science. The establishment of a set of scientific, reasonable and effective evaluation system of business performance can guide the management behavior of enterprises correctly, help the managers of enterprises to find the advantages and gaps of enterprises, so that the enterprises can maintain their advantages. Shorten the gap to enhance their core competitiveness and achieve the strategic goal of enterprise development. With the realization of socialist market economy system in China, the rapid development of real estate industry contributes to the construction of our national economy in the process of rapid economic development. The government has made great efforts to adjust and control the real estate market. Under this background, it is of great practical significance to evaluate the performance level of Chinese real estate enterprises. At the same time, the development of the entire national economy has played an important role. This paper firstly combs the relevant theories of enterprise performance evaluation, and probes into the two methods of performance evaluation, which are factor analysis and EVA, which are used in this paper. On this basis, the financial data of 30 real estate companies in Shenzhen and Shanghai stock markets in 2012 are used as samples to evaluate their performance. From the four angles of profitability, operation ability, solvency and development ability, the evaluation indexes which accord with the characteristics of real estate enterprises are selected. As the original variable indexes of factor analysis, five public factors are obtained in this paper. Then, by using the performance evaluation method of EVA, the adjusted items are selected, and the value of EVA of each sample enterprise is calculated according to the formula. Considering the effect of scale, the performance of 30 real estate enterprises is ranked by EPA / total investment capital. After the evaluation results of the two methods are obtained, the correlation degree of the two methods is judged by the method of comprehensive ordinal number, and then the results of the two kinds of performance evaluation are synthesized with appropriate weight ratio, and the ranking results are obtained. The performance evaluation method combining factor analysis and EVA can not only reflect the financial information of the enterprise, but also consider the capital cost of the enterprise. So that the evaluation results can more truly reflect the wealth created by enterprises for shareholders.
【學位授予單位】：重慶交通大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F299.233.42

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周長青;EVA業(yè)績評價系統(tǒng)評述[J];財會通訊;2001年08期

2 李秉成;黃厚建;余珍;;我國集團公司內(nèi)部業(yè)績評價方法演進——基于武漢鋼鐵(集團)公司案例研究[J];財政監(jiān)督;2007年08期

3 王慶芳,周子劍;EVA:價值評估與業(yè)績評價的理論探討[J];當代財經(jīng);2001年10期

4 曹元坤,占小軍;激勵理論研究現(xiàn)狀及發(fā)展[J];當代財經(jīng);2003年12期

5 郭家虎,崔文娟;EVA對企業(yè)價值的解釋度:比較研究[J];當代財經(jīng);2004年05期

6 王國順,彭宏;EVA方法有效性的實證研究[J];系統(tǒng)工程;2004年01期

7 陳建國;譚穎賢;;基于因子分析方法的房地產(chǎn)業(yè)財務(wù)分析[J];南方金融;2008年05期

8 趙云陽,李元;經(jīng)濟增加值(EVA)指標在我國股市的實證研究[J];廣州大學學報(自然科學版);2004年01期

9 倪義芳;吳曉波;;論企業(yè)戰(zhàn)略管理思想的演變[J];經(jīng)濟管理;2001年06期

10 王喜剛,叢海濤,歐陽令南;什么解釋公司價值:EVA還是會計指標[J];經(jīng)濟科學;2003年02期

，

本文編號：1785054