發(fā)布時(shí)間：2024-05-11 03:46

　　近年來,元話語研究受到越來越多的關(guān)注,集結(jié)了大量成果。前人的研究證明,元話語在語篇理解和學(xué)術(shù)寫作等方面的重要性�，F(xiàn)有文獻(xiàn)中,相關(guān)研究多集中在對整體學(xué)術(shù)語篇中的元話語的剖析,分析的語篇多為碩博研究生論文或?qū)W術(shù)期刊論文,而針對學(xué)位論文摘要中元話語使用情況的實(shí)證研究較少,尤其是從跨學(xué)科角度對國內(nèi)高校本科畢業(yè)論文英文摘要的研究仍有很大空間。因此,有必要從元話語的視角進(jìn)行探討,為本科學(xué)生英語學(xué)術(shù)摘要寫作教學(xué)提供參考。本文以Hyland的元話語理論為支撐,借用該理論中的分類模式為操作定義,通過分層抽樣選取國內(nèi)某高校200個(gè)本科畢業(yè)論文英語摘要為分析語料(工科及文科各100個(gè)),運(yùn)用定性的個(gè)案分析和定量的頻度考察兩種方法,對其中交際類和互動(dòng)類元話語的使用情況進(jìn)行調(diào)查,解讀背后所表達(dá)的功能,并探討工科(土木工程和電氣化工程)及文科(公共管理和大眾傳媒)學(xué)士學(xué)位論文英語摘要中元話語使用的異同。研究旨在考查中國本科畢業(yè)論文英語摘要中元話語的使用特點(diǎn),探討兩類不同學(xué)科是否會(huì)對論文英語摘要中元話語的使用產(chǎn)生影響。研究結(jié)果顯示：(1)兩組學(xué)生使用交際類元話語均多于互動(dòng)類元話語。這可能因?yàn)榻浑H類元話語的恰當(dāng)使用可...

【文章頁數(shù)】：69 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION
    1.1 Research Background
    1.2 Purpose and Significance of the Study
    1.3 Research Questions
    1.4 Organization of the Thesis
CHAPTER TWO THEORY AND LITERATURE REVIEW
    2.1 Definitions and Functions of Metadiscourse
        2.1.1 Theoretical Definitions of Metadiscourse
        2.1.2 Functions of Metadiscourse
        2.1.3 Existing Approaches to Metadiscourse Studies
    2.2 Classification of Metadiscourse
        2.2.1 Vande Kopple's Classifications
        2.2.2 Crismore et al's Classifications
        2.2.3 Hyland & Tse's Classifications
    2.3 Relevant Empirical Studies on Metadiscourse in Academic Writing
        2.3.1 Studies on Metadiscourse across Disciplines
        2.3.2 Studies on Metadiscourse across Languages
        2.3.3 Studies on Metadiscourse in Thesis Abstracts
        2.3.4 Studies on Academic Writing
        2.3.5 Influence of Metadiscourse on Academic Writing
    2.4 Gap Finding
CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY
    3.1 Sampling Procedures
    3.2 Building Two Small Corpora
    3.3 Analytic Framework
    3.4 Data Analysis Procedures
        3.4.1 Qualitative Data Coding
        3.4.2 Quantitative Data Coding
CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    4.1 Qualitative Analysis to Metadiscourse Use
        4.1.1 Detecting Interactive Metadiscourse Features and Functions
        4.1.2 Detecting Interactional Metadiscourse Features and Functions
    4.2 Quantitative Analysis to Metadiscourse Use in the Two Corpora
        4.2.1 The Overall Distribution of Metadiscourse Markers
        4.2.2 Distribution of Interactive Metadiscourse Use
        4.2.3 Distribution of Interactional Metadiscourse Use
    4.3 Metadiscourse Use between Bachelor of Engineering and of Arts
        4.3.1 Similarities
        4.3.2 Differences
        4.3.3 Factors Underlying the Similarities and Differences
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION
    5.1 Major Findings of the Study
    5.2 Limitations and Suggestions
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
PAPER PUBLISHED DURING MA STUDIES



本文編號：3969474