發(fā)布時間：2018-04-25 18:40

  本文選題：裝備制造業(yè) + 投入服務(wù)化��； 參考：《湘潭大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：裝備制造業(yè)為國民經(jīng)濟(jì)中其他行業(yè)提供生產(chǎn)裝備、與其他行業(yè)關(guān)聯(lián)性非常大,對國家的生產(chǎn)、再生產(chǎn)的效率和技術(shù)水平都有很大的影響,同時也是我國作為工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)主體部分的制造業(yè)的支柱產(chǎn)業(yè),其對國家經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展具有舉足輕重的重要性。但是我國裝備制造業(yè)處于“大而不強(qiáng)”的落后局面,需要轉(zhuǎn)型升級以求突破,此時,服務(wù)化的演進(jìn)成為趨勢。而學(xué)術(shù)界在服務(wù)化方面的研究主要集中在制造業(yè)這個大行業(yè),本文有針對性地對裝備制造行業(yè)進(jìn)行服務(wù)化方面的研究,具有豐富該學(xué)術(shù)領(lǐng)域和現(xiàn)實指導(dǎo)的意義。本文結(jié)合裝備制造業(yè)服務(wù)化發(fā)展的分工理論、價值鏈理論、競爭戰(zhàn)略理論以及產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)演進(jìn)理論,分析了裝備制造業(yè)服務(wù)化的驅(qū)動因素主要為滿足顧客需求、取得競爭優(yōu)勢、適應(yīng)知識經(jīng)濟(jì)時代以及增加經(jīng)濟(jì)效益,并界定了裝備制造企業(yè)服務(wù)化的四個發(fā)展階段;同時了解我國裝備制造業(yè)的發(fā)展情況,并從投入和產(chǎn)出層面對我國裝備制造業(yè)的服務(wù)化程度進(jìn)行了測度。在投入方面,以最近五年的投入產(chǎn)出表或延伸表為數(shù)據(jù)來源,計算裝備制造業(yè)各子行業(yè)對14個服務(wù)部門以及總服務(wù)業(yè)的直接消耗系數(shù)和完全消耗系數(shù)表示服務(wù)化程度,系數(shù)值越大,投入服務(wù)化程度則越高,反之則越低;在產(chǎn)出方面,以裝備制造業(yè)上市公司公示的年報為主要數(shù)據(jù)來源,統(tǒng)計各個企業(yè)提供服務(wù)的數(shù)量、計算每個上市公司總收入中的服務(wù)性收入占比,通過這兩個指標(biāo)反映我國裝備制造業(yè)的產(chǎn)出服務(wù)化程度。進(jìn)而在裝備制造業(yè)上市公司中選取符合條件的樣本企業(yè),建立實證模型,對企業(yè)服務(wù)化程度與凈資產(chǎn)收益率之間的關(guān)系進(jìn)行10年面板數(shù)據(jù)的實證分析,以反映裝備制造業(yè)服務(wù)化程度對企業(yè)ROE的影響。結(jié)果表明我國裝備制造業(yè)無論是在投入方面還是產(chǎn)出方面都服務(wù)化程度不高,在新興服務(wù)業(yè)方面的投入不足,資本密集型和技術(shù)密集型服務(wù)業(yè)對深化裝備制造業(yè)服務(wù)化還有很大的潛力;而我國裝備制造企業(yè)在服務(wù)化程度對ROE的影響方面,存在“服務(wù)化困境”現(xiàn)象,但是各子行業(yè)的服務(wù)化程度與績效的曲線走勢不一,金屬制品業(yè)、交通運(yùn)輸設(shè)備制造業(yè)的服務(wù)化程度與績效成“U型”曲線,通用和專用設(shè)備制造業(yè)、儀器儀表制造業(yè)對應(yīng)“倒U型”,而通信設(shè)備、計算機(jī)及其他電子設(shè)備制造業(yè)和電氣機(jī)械及器材制造業(yè)的關(guān)系曲線為“馬鞍型”,原因是根據(jù)子行業(yè)特點(diǎn)的不同,落入和走出“服務(wù)化困境”的時間長短不同。
[Abstract]:The equipment manufacturing industry provides production equipment for other industries in the national economy, and has great relevance with other industries. It has a great impact on the national production, the efficiency of reproduction and the level of technology. At the same time, it is also the pillar industry of manufacturing industry as the main part of industrial economy in China, which plays an important role in the development of national economy. However, the equipment manufacturing industry in our country is in the backward situation of "big but not strong", which needs to be transformed and upgraded in order to make a breakthrough. At this time, the evolution of service becomes a trend. The research in the field of service is mainly focused on the large industry of manufacturing. This paper focuses on the service-oriented research of the equipment manufacturing industry, which has the significance of enriching the academic field and practical guidance. Combined with the division of labor theory, value chain theory, competitive strategy theory and industrial structure evolution theory of equipment manufacturing service development, this paper analyzes that the driving factors of equipment manufacturing service development are mainly to meet customer demand and obtain competitive advantage. In order to adapt to the era of knowledge economy and increase economic benefits, the paper defines the four stages of service development of equipment manufacturing enterprises, and at the same time understands the development situation of equipment manufacturing industry in China. The service degree of China's equipment manufacturing industry is measured in terms of input and output. In terms of inputs, using the input-output tables or extension tables for the last five years as a source of data, the direct and total consumption factors of each subsector of the equipment manufacturing industry for 14 service sectors as well as the total service sector are calculated to indicate the degree of service, The greater the coefficient is, the higher the degree of service input is, and the lower the degree of service is. In terms of output, the annual report published by listed companies in the equipment manufacturing industry is the main data source, and the number of services provided by each enterprise is counted. The ratio of service income to total income of each listed company is calculated, and the output service degree of China's equipment manufacturing industry is reflected by these two indexes. Then select qualified sample enterprises in the listed companies of equipment manufacturing industry, establish empirical model, and carry out empirical analysis of the relationship between the degree of service and the return on net assets in 10 years panel data. In order to reflect the equipment manufacturing service level of the enterprise ROE impact. The results show that China's equipment manufacturing industry is not highly service-oriented in terms of input or output, and insufficient investment in emerging services. There is great potential for capital-intensive and technology-intensive service industries to deepen the service-oriented equipment manufacturing industry, while in China's equipment manufacturing enterprises, there is a "service-oriented dilemma" in terms of the influence of the degree of service-oriented service on ROE. However, the service degree and performance curve of each sub-industry are different. The service degree and performance of metal products industry, transportation equipment manufacturing industry and transportation equipment manufacturing industry are "U-shaped" curves, and general and special equipment manufacturing industries, The instrument manufacturing industry corresponds to the "inverted U type", and the relationship curve between the communication equipment, computer and other electronic equipment manufacturing and electrical, mechanical and equipment manufacturing industries is "saddle type", which is due to the different characteristics of the sub-industries. The time to fall into and out of the "service dilemma" is different.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F426;F406.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 簡兆權(quán);伍卓深;;制造業(yè)服務(wù)化的路徑選擇研究——基于微笑曲線理論的觀點(diǎn)[J];科學(xué)學(xué)與科學(xué)技術(shù)管理;2011年12期

2 佘再玲;;論中國裝備制造企業(yè)的服務(wù)化轉(zhuǎn)型[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年21期

3 邢玉婷;喬芳麗;;裝備制造業(yè)服務(wù)化趨勢與對策分析[J];沈陽工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年03期

4 王春芝;嚴(yán)姍姍;金亞南;;大連裝備制造業(yè)服務(wù)化發(fā)展路徑探討[J];大連民族學(xué)院學(xué)報;2011年04期

5 楊仁發(fā);劉純彬;;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與制造業(yè)融合背景的產(chǎn)業(yè)升級[J];改革;2011年01期

6 汪應(yīng)洛;;創(chuàng)新服務(wù)型制造業(yè),優(yōu)化產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)[J];管理工程學(xué)報;2010年S1期

7 顧乃華;夏杰長;;對外貿(mào)易與制造業(yè)投入服務(wù)化的經(jīng)濟(jì)效應(yīng)——基于2007年投入產(chǎn)出表的實證研究[J];社會科學(xué)研究;2010年05期

8 安筱鵬;;制造業(yè)服務(wù)化的路線圖[J];中國信息界;2010年05期

9 陳潔雄;;制造業(yè)服務(wù)化與經(jīng)營績效的實證檢驗——基于中美上市公司的比較[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理;2010年04期

10 周艷春;;制造企業(yè)服務(wù)化:概念界定及特征分析[J];西安財經(jīng)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年02期

，

本文編號：1802494