發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-18 15:31

  本文選題：虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn) + 刑法保護(hù)��； 參考：《江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：進(jìn)入信息時(shí)代以來,科技高速發(fā)展,互聯(lián)網(wǎng)絡(luò)早已走進(jìn)千家萬戶。互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的繁榮催生出一項(xiàng)新事物---虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)。虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)產(chǎn)生于二十世紀(jì)九十年代。起初,人們并未意識到虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)的價(jià)值,立法者也未對虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)進(jìn)行法律規(guī)制。隨著網(wǎng)絡(luò)時(shí)代的來臨,人們的活動逐步由線下轉(zhuǎn)為線上,信息產(chǎn)品也呈現(xiàn)爆炸式的增長,虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)應(yīng)用的廣度、深度已到了不容法律忽視的地步。隨著虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)市場的擴(kuò)大,侵犯虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)犯罪也日漸增多。在此大背景下,本文從虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)刑事案件入手,分析其刑法保護(hù)的司法現(xiàn)狀。由于虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)的特殊性,侵犯虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)案件呈現(xiàn)出作案手段多樣化、科技化、隱蔽化等特點(diǎn)。實(shí)踐中,侵犯虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)案件出現(xiàn)大量同案異判的現(xiàn)象,對此類案件的裁判面臨無法可依、價(jià)值認(rèn)定難、管轄權(quán)認(rèn)定難、取證難等判罰困境。本文在對造成司法實(shí)踐中虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)判罰困境的原因進(jìn)行分析梳理后,建議從五個(gè)方面加大對虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)的刑法保護(hù)力度。第一,借鑒域外國家優(yōu)秀的立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)。在全球化網(wǎng)絡(luò)時(shí)代的背景下,各國也面臨虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)刑法保護(hù)問題,特別是一些發(fā)達(dá)國家,早已對虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)進(jìn)行法律規(guī)制。各國針對虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)的刑事保護(hù)各有不同,保護(hù)的側(cè)重點(diǎn)也有差異,對我國虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)的立法具有很好的借鑒作用。第二,通過立法層面對虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)行為進(jìn)行界定,對虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)的法律屬性予以明確,使侵犯虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)案件判罰時(shí)有法可依、有章可循。對侵犯虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)行為的認(rèn)定,立法界存在一定的爭議。面對立法爭議,建議在立法時(shí)根據(jù)虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)的特性,對侵犯虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)行為進(jìn)行合理界定。第三,建立一套可量化的虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)評估體系。虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)具有網(wǎng)絡(luò)依賴性、種類繁多、無公允的市場價(jià)值、價(jià)值浮動性等特點(diǎn),使法院在對其價(jià)值進(jìn)行認(rèn)定時(shí)存在困難。一套可量化、可行性高的評估體系有利于對虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)的準(zhǔn)確估值。第四,明確案件管轄權(quán)。涉及多個(gè)犯罪地的案件易產(chǎn)生管轄權(quán)爭議,可以參照刑事訴訟法和相關(guān)司法解釋對網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪的管轄權(quán)規(guī)定。第五,強(qiáng)化電子證據(jù)管理,解決取證難問題。加大對網(wǎng)絡(luò)運(yùn)營商的管理,督促網(wǎng)絡(luò)運(yùn)營商加強(qiáng)數(shù)據(jù)路徑管理和留存,推行網(wǎng)絡(luò)實(shí)名制。
[Abstract]:Since entering the information age, the rapid development of science and technology, the Internet has already entered thousands of households. The Internet boom spawned a new thing-virtual property. Virtual property came into being in the 1990 s. At first, people did not realize the value of virtual property, nor did legislator regulate virtual property. With the advent of the network era, people's activities gradually from offline to online, information products also show explosive growth, the application of virtual property breadth, depth has reached the point that can not be ignored by law. With the expansion of virtual property market, the crime of infringing virtual property is increasing day by day. Under this background, this article starts with the criminal case of virtual property and analyzes the judicial status of its criminal law protection. Because of the particularity of virtual property, the crime of infringing virtual property is characterized by various means of crime, science and technology, concealment and so on. In practice, a large number of cases of infringement of virtual property appear the phenomenon of different judgments in the same case. The judgment of this kind of cases is faced with the difficulties of being unable to rely on, the value determination is difficult, the jurisdiction determination is difficult, the evidence gathering is difficult and so on. After analyzing and combing the causes of the dilemma of judgment and punishment of virtual property in judicial practice, this paper suggests to strengthen the criminal law protection of virtual property from five aspects. First, learn from the excellent legislative experience of foreign countries. Under the background of the global network era, countries are also facing the problem of criminal law protection of virtual property, especially in some developed countries, which have already carried out legal regulation on virtual property. The criminal protection of virtual property is different in different countries, and the emphasis of protection is also different, which has a good reference to the legislation of virtual property in our country. Second, through the legislative level to define the virtual property behavior, the legal attributes of virtual property to be clear, so that violations of virtual property cases can be punished according to the law, there are rules to follow. There are some disputes in the legislative circle on the confirmation of the violation of virtual property. In the face of legislation dispute, it is suggested that the infringement of virtual property should be reasonably defined according to the characteristics of virtual property. Third, establish a set of quantifiable virtual property evaluation system. Virtual property has the characteristics of network dependence, variety, unfair market value and floating value, which makes it difficult for the court to determine its value. A set of quantifiable and high feasibility evaluation system is beneficial to the accurate valuation of virtual property. Fourth, clear case jurisdiction. Cases involving multiple places of crime are prone to disputes over jurisdiction, which can be governed by the criminal procedure law and the relevant judicial interpretations on the jurisdiction of cybercrime. Fifth, strengthen the management of electronic evidence and solve the problem of obtaining evidence. Strengthen the management of network operators, urge network operators to strengthen the data path management and retention, and implement the network real name system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郭慧慧;;盜竊網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)的刑法規(guī)制[J];法制與社會;2016年31期

2 溫世揚(yáng);;民法總則中“權(quán)利客體”的立法考量——以特別“物”為重點(diǎn)[J];法學(xué);2016年04期

3 申晨;;虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)規(guī)則的路徑重構(gòu)[J];法學(xué)家;2016年01期

4 劉明祥;;竊取網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)行為定性探究[J];法學(xué);2016年01期

5 陳燁;;虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)的刑法保護(hù)路徑研究[J];天津法學(xué);2015年03期

6 張明楷;;非法獲取虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)的行為性質(zhì)[J];法學(xué);2015年03期

7 田宏杰;肖鵬;周時(shí)雨;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)的界定及刑法保護(hù)[J];人民檢察;2015年05期

8 曹一雯;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)的法律屬性及其保護(hù)[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年02期

9 夏尊文;;論盜竊網(wǎng)絡(luò)游戲虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)行為定性的法律根據(jù)[J];行政與法;2014年08期

10 鄒政;;盜竊虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)行為的刑法適用探討——兼論虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)價(jià)格的確定[J];法律適用;2014年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 郭俊玲;盜竊網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)問題研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2016年

2 鄭嘉瑋;關(guān)于虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)的若干法律問題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年

3 馬志海;盜竊網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)行為的法律分析[D];重慶大學(xué);2015年

4 李晨;網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪案件偵查取證研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號：2035968