中国韩国日本在线观看免费,A级尤物一区,日韩精品一二三区无码,欧美日韩少妇色

當(dāng)前位置:主頁 > 法律論文 > 國際法論文 >

國際法視野下的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)與人權(quán)

發(fā)布時間:2019-04-19 08:11
【摘要】:由發(fā)達國家主導(dǎo)的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護標(biāo)準(zhǔn)基本上實現(xiàn)了全球化的目標(biāo)。知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法律全球化的直接后果就是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)與人權(quán)的沖突,尤其是《世界貿(mào)易組織與貿(mào)易有關(guān)的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)協(xié)議》(以下簡稱TRIPS協(xié)議)對人權(quán)構(gòu)成了直接沖擊,本文針對人權(quán)與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)兩種權(quán)利范疇探討兩種國際體制(Regime),探討知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法律全球化的演進,并描述全球化過程中知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的權(quán)利擴張圖景;以人權(quán)條約產(chǎn)生、發(fā)展和人權(quán)本身的演變軌跡考察全球化條件下人權(quán)的成長情況。分析兩種權(quán)利在全球化條件下沖突與并存的情況,通過對國際條約的文本分析、倫理分析以及經(jīng)濟分析,研究人權(quán)與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)兩種權(quán)利的沖突原因、沖突表現(xiàn)和沖突的全球治理情況,并嘗試探求知識產(chǎn)權(quán)全球治理的人權(quán)進路。 引言部分,主要提出研究的問題與研究目的,闡明分析的路徑與方法。 第一章,對作為財產(chǎn)權(quán)的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)進行研究,討論了有關(guān)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的概念和特征、評價關(guān)于知識產(chǎn)權(quán)正當(dāng)性(Justification)的學(xué)說,通過對財產(chǎn)權(quán)意義上的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的討論與分析,為界定知識產(chǎn)權(quán)與人權(quán)的不同權(quán)利屬性提供理論基礎(chǔ)。 第二章,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)與人權(quán)的沖突產(chǎn)生的原因。知識產(chǎn)權(quán)對人權(quán)產(chǎn)生沖擊,正是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法律全球化過程中產(chǎn)生的結(jié)果,本章主要討論知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法律全球化的進程與影響,探析知識產(chǎn)權(quán)與人權(quán)沖突的各種原因。 第三章,分析知識產(chǎn)權(quán)與人權(quán)沖突的表現(xiàn),重點分析《與貿(mào)易有關(guān)的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)協(xié)議》(TRIPS協(xié)議)對人權(quán)的沖擊。初步分析知識產(chǎn)權(quán)與人權(quán)沖突的表現(xiàn);鑒于正是世界貿(mào)易組織的TRIPS協(xié)議引起國際社會對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)與人權(quán)沖突問題的高度關(guān)注并開展相應(yīng)的全球治理行動,TRIPS協(xié)議是觸發(fā)國際社會“知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的人權(quán)”議題的觸媒劑,也是人權(quán)與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突的焦點,因此本章著重對TRIPS協(xié)議與人權(quán)問題展開討論,指出實現(xiàn)國際人權(quán)條約下的人權(quán)義務(wù)和實現(xiàn)TRIPS條約下的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護義務(wù)兩方面具有不平衡性。 第四章,分析知識產(chǎn)權(quán)與人權(quán)的沖突產(chǎn)生的原因。首先,明確了利益沖突是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)與人權(quán)的沖突產(chǎn)生的根本原因。其次,全球化條件下人權(quán)的成長與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的擴展導(dǎo)致權(quán)利沖突。最后,由于國際法律對人權(quán)的識別和確認(rèn)模糊不清,也導(dǎo)致了在更多的方面潛在人權(quán)與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的沖突與緊張。而另外還有一種沖突源自“軟法”和“硬法”的沖突。 結(jié)束語部分得出研究結(jié)論:現(xiàn)存的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)國際體制是與人權(quán)相沖突的,必須通過全球治理建立一個符合人權(quán)目標(biāo)的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)體制。我國應(yīng)采取積極措施,在滿足知識產(chǎn)權(quán)國際公約最低保護要求前提下,充分利用國際公約的選擇性條款和限制性條款,從最大程度地保障我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)利益出發(fā),確定是否應(yīng)當(dāng)保護以及如何保護;以利益平衡原則為指導(dǎo),進一步完善知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法律制度,尤其是要盡快出臺規(guī)制知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用行為的法律條款;緊密結(jié)合國家知識產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略,建立以知識產(chǎn)權(quán)為導(dǎo)向的公共政策體系;密切關(guān)注國際知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度發(fā)展的最新動態(tài),積極參與到知識產(chǎn)權(quán)國際事務(wù)的交流與合作。
[Abstract]:The intellectual property protection standard led by developed countries has basically realized the goal of globalization. The direct consequence of the legal globalization of intellectual property is that the conflict between intellectual property and human rights, in particular the TRIPS Agreement, is a direct impact on human rights, In the light of the two categories of rights and intellectual property rights, this paper discusses the two international regimes (Regime), discusses the evolution of the legal globalization of intellectual property, and describes the expansion of the right of the intellectual property right in the process of globalization; it is produced by the human rights treaty, The evolution of the development and human rights itself examines the growth of human rights in the context of globalization. By analyzing the conflicts and co-existence of the two rights under the conditions of globalization, through the text analysis, the ethical analysis and the economic analysis of the international treaties, the causes of the conflict between the two rights of human rights and intellectual property, the conflict performance and the global governance of the conflict are studied. And try to explore the human rights approach to the global governance of intellectual property. The introduction part, mainly put forward the research question and the research purpose, clarify the path and the party of the analysis The first chapter studies the intellectual property right as property right, discusses the concept and characteristics of the intellectual property right, and evaluates the theory about the legitimacy of intellectual property, and through the discussion of the intellectual property right in the sense of property right and analysis to provide a basis for defining the different rights attributes of intellectual property rights and human rights On the foundation. Chapter two, the conflict between intellectual property and human rights The impact of intellectual property rights on human rights is the result of the process of the legal globalization of intellectual property. This chapter mainly discusses the process and influence of the legal globalization of intellectual property, and probes into the conflict between intellectual property and human rights. The third chapter analyses the performance of the conflict between intellectual property and human rights, with a focus on the analysis of the TRIPS Agreement (TRIPS) ) Impact on human rights. Initial analysis of the performance of the conflict between intellectual property and human rights; in view of the fact that the TRIPS Agreement of the World Trade Organization has raised the international community's high interest in the issue of intellectual property and human rights conflicts and the corresponding global governance action, the TRIPS Agreement is the trigger of the international community "Human rights of international property" The topic's catalytic agent is also the focus of the conflict between human rights and intellectual property rights, so this chapter focuses on the discussion on the TRIPS Agreement and human rights issues, pointing out the realization of the human rights obligations under international human rights treaties and the realization of the protection of intellectual property rights under the TRIPS Treaty There is an imbalance in the face. Chapter 4, Analysis of Intellectual Property and Human The conflict of the right is the cause of the conflict. First, it is clear that the conflict of interest is intellectual property and human rights The root causes of the conflict. Second, the growth of human rights and intellectual property rights under the condition of globalization The extension of the right to conflict leads to a conflict of rights. Finally, the recognition and recognition of human rights by international law has also led to the potential human rights and knowledge in more ways To recognize the conflict and tension of property rights. There is also a conflict that is derived from the "soft method" and the "hard method" The conclusion is that the existing international system of intellectual property is in conflict with human rights and must be established through global governance. Our country should take active measures to make full use of the optional clauses and restrictive clauses of the international conventions, in order to guarantee the interests of the intellectual property rights of our country to the greatest extent, in order to guarantee the interests of the intellectual property rights of our country. No protection and protection should be protected; in the light of the principle of interest balance, the legal system of intellectual property rights should be further improved, in particular, the legal provisions regulating the abuse of intellectual property rights should be introduced as soon as possible; and the national intellectual property strategy should be closely integrated, and knowledge production should be established. Right-oriented public policy system; pay close attention to the latest developments in the development of the international intellectual property system, and actively participate in the knowledge production
【學(xué)位授予單位】:廣西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類號】:D996.1;D997.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 葉傳星;;人權(quán)概念的理論分歧解析[J];法學(xué)家;2005年06期

2 魯浪浪;;論知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域社會正義的實現(xiàn)[J];法制與社會;2009年15期

3 李良才;;人權(quán)理念對國際法價值取向的人本化改造[J];甘肅聯(lián)合大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年01期

4 徐莉;;論貿(mào)易與人權(quán)保護制度的協(xié)調(diào)[J];時代法學(xué);2009年02期

5 陳瑛琦;;TRIPS協(xié)議第31條修正案研究[J];合作經(jīng)濟與科技;2009年17期

6 沈宗靈;權(quán)利、義務(wù)、權(quán)力[J];法學(xué)研究;1998年03期

7 李楊;陳思琴;;傳統(tǒng)知識保護的自然法合理性初探——從集體人權(quán)與羅爾斯“正義論”的角度來審視[J];南昌航空大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年02期

8 陳亦超;;國際知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護中的人權(quán)問題——從藥品強制許可談起[J];麗水學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年01期

9 鄭欣;;論知識產(chǎn)權(quán)人身權(quán)與人權(quán)[J];牡丹江大學(xué)學(xué)報;2009年08期

10 勝雅律;;人權(quán)概念在聯(lián)合國的發(fā)展[J];人權(quán);2009年01期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前2條

1 馬秀山;[N];中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)報;2004年

2 邵培樟;[N];中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)報;2004年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 王培舒;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)與人權(quán)的聯(lián)系、沖突與協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年

2 趙宴群;文化權(quán)利的確立與實現(xiàn)[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2007年

3 胡朝陽;論知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的正當(dāng)性[D];南京師范大學(xué);2006年

4 衣淑玲;國際人權(quán)法視角下《TRIPS協(xié)定》的變革研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 田勝;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)與人權(quán)的沖突和協(xié)調(diào)[D];中南民族大學(xué);2007年

2 孫秀紅;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)國際保護與人權(quán)關(guān)系問題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年

3 侯淑芬;論艾滋病防治領(lǐng)域的國際法新問題[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2008年

4 顏君;WTO中人權(quán)相關(guān)條款研究[D];外交學(xué)院;2009年



本文編號:2460778

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://www.lk138.cn/falvlunwen/guojifa/2460778.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

版權(quán)申明:資料由用戶c9e01***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要刪除請E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com