【摘要】：隨著2010年10月28日我國(guó)《涉外民事關(guān)系法律適用法》的通過(guò)，國(guó)際私法體系中涉外侵權(quán)領(lǐng)域的法律適用法又一次被學(xué)界矚目。《涉外民事關(guān)系法律適用法》主要用第六章的篇幅將有關(guān)涉外侵權(quán)的法律條文納入其中，這一章不僅吸納了涉外侵權(quán)的一般規(guī)則，還納入了一些特殊規(guī)則的適用。處于世界范圍內(nèi)首屈一指的區(qū)域性組織歐盟也曾在2007年頒布了一部類似的法律，即《羅馬條例II》。《羅馬條例II》是歐盟立法者在國(guó)際私法領(lǐng)域積累的大量先進(jìn)的法律理念和立法技術(shù)的成果。這兩部法律是目前中國(guó)與歐盟涉外侵權(quán)領(lǐng)域的法律適用法。 從中國(guó)和歐盟涉外侵權(quán)領(lǐng)域的法律沖突入手，，結(jié)合個(gè)案研究對(duì)中國(guó)《涉外民事關(guān)系法律適用法》與歐盟《羅馬條例II》這兩部涉外侵權(quán)沖突法的共有規(guī)則及其相應(yīng)法條進(jìn)行規(guī)范分析和比較分析得出差異，進(jìn)一步對(duì)這些差異的產(chǎn)生原因進(jìn)行深入的剖析和闡明，并進(jìn)行相應(yīng)的價(jià)值判斷和法律思考，得到我國(guó)法律可以借鑒之處，最終實(shí)現(xiàn)幫助完善我國(guó)涉外法律沖突法不足之處的目的，為我國(guó)涉外侵權(quán)領(lǐng)域法律的發(fā)展做出貢獻(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:With the adoption of the Law applicable to Foreign Civil Relations on 28 October 2010, The applicable law in the field of foreign tort in the system of private international law has once again attracted the attention of the academic circles. The Law on the Application of Law concerning Foreign Civil Relations mainly includes the legal provisions on foreign tort in the sixth chapter. This chapter not only absorbs the general rules of foreign infringement, but also includes the application of some special rules. The European Union, the world's leading regional organization, enacted a similar law in 2007. Rome Regulation II. Rome Regulation II is the result of a large number of advanced legal ideas and legislative techniques accumulated by EU legislators in the field of private international law. These two laws are the applicable laws in the field of foreign-related infringement between China and the European Union. Starting with the conflict of laws in the field of foreign-related infringement between China and the European Union, Combining with the case study, this paper makes a normative and comparative analysis of the common rules of the two foreign-related tort conflict laws, the applicable Law of the Law on Civil Relations concerning Foreign Affairs and the European Union Regulation II, and their corresponding laws and regulations, and draws a conclusion of the differences between the two laws. The causes of these differences are further analyzed and clarified, and the corresponding value judgment and legal thinking are carried out, which can be used for reference by the law of our country. Finally realize the purpose of helping to perfect the deficiency of the law of conflict of laws concerning foreign affairs, and make contribution to the development of the law of the field of infringement concerning foreign affairs in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D997

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 宋曉;;雙重可訴規(guī)則:進(jìn)退之際[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2009年01期

2 董海洲;;從“身份”到“場(chǎng)所”——屬人法連結(jié)點(diǎn)的歷史與發(fā)展[J];法學(xué)家;2010年01期

3 王秀轉(zhuǎn);;歐盟《非合同之債的法律適用條例》之規(guī)則批判[J];河北法學(xué);2009年12期

4 肖永平;崔相龍;;歐盟《非合同之債法律適用條例》評(píng)析[J];暨南學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年03期

5 程漢大;英國(guó)憲政傳統(tǒng)的歷史成因[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2005年01期

6 李雙元,鄧杰,熊之才;國(guó)際社會(huì)本位的理念與法院地法適用的合理限制[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年05期

7 馬瑞麗;涉外侵權(quán)行為法律適用的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)[J];學(xué)習(xí)論壇;2005年11期

本文編號(hào)：2446518