發(fā)布時間：2018-05-01 11:16

  本文選題：海外直接投資 + 政治風險��； 參考：《南京師范大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：自2008年金融危機以后,世界經濟形勢陷入低迷,而中國經濟卻一直保持高速發(fā)展并擁有了資本輸入國和資本輸出國雙重身份。伴隨我國海外直接投資規(guī)模的擴大和世界形勢的變化,我國海外直接投資者遭遇的政治風險也有新的變化。由于我國海外直接投資區(qū)域和產業(yè)分布特點以及發(fā)達國家和發(fā)展中國家具體國情與外資政策的不同,我國的海外直接投資在發(fā)達國家和發(fā)展中國國家面臨的主要政治風險有所差異。這些政治風險給我國的海外直接投資者造成了相當大的經濟損失,嚴重損害了我國的國家利益。而我國現(xiàn)有的保護機制卻有許多不足,不能適應我國海外投資遭遇的政治風險的變化。這種情況下,從保護投資者利益的角度出發(fā),政府和投資者完善海外直接投資政治風險的應對措施是我國海外投資發(fā)展中迫切需要解決的問題。 本文介紹了我國海外直接投資的現(xiàn)狀和傳統(tǒng)的政治風險類型,重點介紹2001年中國加入世貿組織后,特別是2008年金融危機后,中國海外直接投資者在發(fā)達國家和發(fā)展中國家遭遇的政治風險的變化,并結合我國現(xiàn)有應對措施的不足,嘗試從政府和投資者兩個角度來應對我國海外直接投資的政治風險。 全文分為引言、正文和結語三個部分。正文部分分為三章： 第一章海外直接投資政治風險概述。本章主要介紹了海外直接投資的概念,政治風險的概念、我國海外直接投資的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀,以及政治風險的類型。 第二章中國海外直接投資政治風險的變化。本章首先分析了中國海外直接投資政治風險在發(fā)達國家和發(fā)展中國家各自的不同變化和原因,然后分別論述發(fā)達國家和發(fā)展中國家政治風險的變化的表現(xiàn)。其中,中國海外直接投資者在發(fā)達國家主要面臨國家安全審查風險、反壟斷管制和間接征收風險；在發(fā)展中國家主要包括亞洲地區(qū)的政局動蕩、反華排華情緒與恐怖主義襲擊等風險,拉丁美洲地區(qū)的間接征收、戰(zhàn)亂、環(huán)保問題、工會問題和社會問題等風險；非洲地區(qū)的武裝沖突、政府腐敗和大國博弈等風險。 第三章是針對中國海外直接投資政治風險變化的應對措施。本章就完善我國海外直接投資政治風險的應對提出建議。政府方面應完善海外投資保險法律制度和雙邊投資協(xié)定,并積極運用外交手段維護我國海外投資者利益。投資者方面應學會未雨綢繆,投資前做好政治風險評估工作；防患于未然,投保政治風險；亡羊補牢,利用法律武器維權。
[Abstract]:Since the financial crisis in 2008, the world economic situation has been in the doldrums, while China's economy has maintained a high speed of development and has the dual status of capital importing country and capital exporting country. With the expansion of China's overseas direct investment and the change of the world situation, there are new changes in the political risks encountered by China's overseas direct investors. Because of the regional and industrial distribution characteristics of China's foreign direct investment and the differences between the specific conditions of developed and developing countries and foreign investment policies, The main political risks faced by China's overseas direct investment in developed and developing countries are different. These political risks have caused considerable economic losses to China's overseas direct investors and seriously damaged the national interests of our country. However, the existing protection mechanism of our country has many shortcomings, which can not adapt to the changes of political risks encountered by overseas investment in our country. In this case, from the point of view of protecting the interests of investors, the government and investors to improve the political risk of overseas direct investment measures are urgent problems to be solved in the development of overseas investment in China. This paper introduces the current situation of China's overseas direct investment and the traditional types of political risks, focusing on China's accession to the WTO in 2001, especially after the 2008 financial crisis. This paper tries to deal with the political risk of China's overseas direct investment from the angle of government and investor, considering the changes of political risks encountered by China's overseas direct investors in both developed and developing countries, and combined with the insufficiency of China's existing countermeasures. The full text is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The text is divided into three chapters: The first chapter summarizes the political risk of overseas direct investment. This chapter mainly introduces the concept of overseas direct investment, the concept of political risk, the development of China's overseas direct investment, and the types of political risk. The second chapter is the change of political risk of China's overseas direct investment. This chapter first analyzes the different changes and causes of the political risks of China's overseas direct investment in developed and developing countries, and then discusses the performance of the political risks in both developed and developing countries. Among them, China's overseas direct investors mainly face the risk of national security review, anti-monopoly regulation and indirect expropriation in developed countries; in developing countries, including the Asian region, the political situation is volatile. Such risks as anti-Chinese anti-Chinese sentiment and terrorist attacks, indirect expropriation in Latin America, war, environmental protection, trade union and social problems, armed conflicts in Africa, government corruption and game play by big powers. The third chapter is the countermeasures to the political risk change of China's overseas direct investment. This chapter puts forward some suggestions on how to improve the political risk of China's overseas direct investment. The government should perfect the legal system of overseas investment insurance and bilateral investment agreement, and actively use diplomatic means to safeguard the interests of overseas investors. Investors should learn to plan ahead of time, do well in political risk assessment before investment; prevent trouble and insure against political risk; make up for the loss and make use of legal weapons to protect their rights.
【學位授予單位】：南京師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D996.4

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 謝曉彬;;外資并購反壟斷規(guī)制的國際協(xié)調[J];法律科學(西北政法大學學報);2011年06期

2 王淑敏;;地緣政治視閾下的中國海外投資準入國民待遇保護——基于“冰島拒絕中坤集團投資案”的法律思考[J];法商研究;2012年02期

3 梁詠;;我國海外直接投資的現(xiàn)狀與雙邊投資協(xié)定的完善[J];法學;2008年07期

4 劉曙光;郭宏宇;;對非投資的政治風險:新動向與應對建議[J];國際經濟合作;2012年11期

5 楊鴻;;美國外資國家安全審查制度的最新改革:對我國影響的評估及其應對[J];江淮論壇;2009年05期

6 陸以全;;對印投資的政治風險及其法律應對措施[J];南亞研究;2012年03期

7 杜仲霞;;美國外資并購國家安全審查制度及對我國的啟示——兼評三一重工、華為在美投資并購受阻案[J];現(xiàn)代經濟探討;2013年03期

8 胡鐵;;關于美國橫向并購反壟斷審查政策最新發(fā)展的述評[J];河北法學;2011年10期

9 華瓊飛;;中國企業(yè)在美國直接投資的政治風險分析[J];理論界;2013年07期

10 石儉平;;我國外資間接征收危機之審視與控制——以雙邊投資協(xié)定為視角[J];求索;2012年04期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 王小林;國際投資間接征收制度解讀和反思[D];吉林大學;2011年

，

本文編號：1829108