發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-26 08:47

  本文選題：索馬里海盜贖金 + 單獨(dú)海損　； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：活躍于索馬里海域的海盜不斷的給過往的商船造成威脅。2008年12月16日,聯(lián)合國安理會(huì)通過了1851號決議,授權(quán)各國使用海陸空力量,上岸或者利用空襲打擊索馬里海盜。這項(xiàng)決議授權(quán)各國在獲取索馬里政府許可的情況前提下,采用一切必要手段包括陸地或者空中力量制止海盜活動(dòng)和海上武裝搶劫行為。政府力量的介入一定程度上遏制了海盜行為,但因索馬里海盜行為而產(chǎn)生的一系列國際法上的問題仍然困擾著各國學(xué)者。海盜贖金問題即是其突出的表現(xiàn)之一。現(xiàn)有資料表明,以往海盜劫持船舶基本上都是搶劫貨物及船上的現(xiàn)有財(cái)產(chǎn),并對可能對船上人員進(jìn)行人身傷害,但索馬里海盜呈現(xiàn)出不同的特征。他們僅僅扣留船只、貨物和船上人員以索取相應(yīng)贖金,并不對船貨及船員安全造成損害。這種形式的海盜行為與現(xiàn)有的國際法律制度不符使得海盜贖金最后各方如何償付及分?jǐn)偝蔀闋幷摻裹c(diǎn)。本文從索馬里海盜行為的差異性著手,逐步探討解決此種贖金分?jǐn)倖栴}的可能方式。 本文正文部分分為四章。第一章主要介紹了索馬里海盜行為的特點(diǎn)以及由此引發(fā)的相關(guān)問題。從海盜行為的定義著手,通過比較分析出索馬里海盜行為的特殊性即不搶劫船舶和船上貨物,而只以此為要挾勒索贖金。第二章分析了索馬里海盜贖金的構(gòu)成。理論上對索馬里海盜贖金進(jìn)行了分解,將其分割為船舶贖金、貨物贖金以及人員贖金三個(gè)部分并逐一探討各部分贖金支付的必要性,為下文的研究做鋪墊。第三章針對海盜贖金的性質(zhì)做了深入的剖析,將其與單獨(dú)海損、共同海損以及海難救助相比較,找出它們之間的相同之處。第四章著重探討索馬里海盜贖金的可能解決方法,在現(xiàn)有保險(xiǎn)法律制度基礎(chǔ)上提出了保賠保險(xiǎn)和政府機(jī)構(gòu)承保的新構(gòu)想,希望能夠?yàn)樗黢R里海盜贖金問題的解決提供理論支持。
[Abstract]:On December 16, 2008, the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 1851, authorizing countries to use sea, land and air power to land or use air strikes to combat Somali pirates. The resolution authorizes States, subject to the permission of the Somali Government, to use all necessary means, including land or air power, to suppress piracy and armed robbery at sea. The intervention of government forces has restrained piracy to a certain extent, but a series of problems in international law caused by Somali piracy still haunt scholars all over the world. The problem of pirate ransom is one of its outstanding manifestations. The available information shows that the hijacking of ships by pirates in the past is basically robbery of cargo and existing property on board and may cause personal injury to the persons on board, but Somali pirates have different characteristics. They simply detain ships, cargo and crew for ransom, without harming the ship's cargo and crew's safety. This form of piracy does not conform to the existing international legal system, which makes the final payment and allocation of pirate ransom become the focus of controversy. Starting from the difference of Somali piracy, this paper discusses the possible ways to solve the problem of ransom allocation. The text of this paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter introduces the characteristics of Somali piracy and the related problems. Starting from the definition of piracy, this paper analyzes the particularity of Somali piracy, that is, not robbing ships and ship cargo, but only using it as blackmail for ransom. The second chapter analyzes the composition of Somali pirate ransom. The ransoms of Somali pirates are decomposed into three parts: ship ransoms, cargo ransoms and personnel ransoms, and the necessity of paying ransoms is discussed one by one. Chapter three makes a deep analysis of the nature of pirate ransom, compares it with individual average, general average and salvage, and finds out the similarities between them. The fourth chapter focuses on the possible solution of Somali pirate ransom. Based on the existing insurance law system, the author puts forward a new concept of insurance and government agencies underwriting, hoping to provide theoretical support for solving the problem of Somali pirate ransom.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D996.19

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 王恩海;;對保險(xiǎn)公司賠付海盜贖金的假想[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年34期

2 尚清;談《約克安特衛(wèi)普規(guī)則2004》對共同海損制度之影響[J];世界海運(yùn);2005年06期

3 鄧珊;;試論保險(xiǎn)利益在海上保險(xiǎn)司法實(shí)踐中的應(yīng)用與完善[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2010年05期

4 李永剛;;索馬里海盜與海上保險(xiǎn)[J];物流科技;2010年03期

5 王桂香,楊召南;海上保險(xiǎn)中施救制度的內(nèi)涵及其應(yīng)用[J];上海海運(yùn)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年01期

6 李聰榮;;海盜贖金應(yīng)由誰買單[J];中國船檢;2010年02期

7 傅廷中;徐昕;;海商法視角內(nèi)的海盜強(qiáng)索贖金問題[J];中國海商法年刊;2009年Z1期

8 石丹;;從海盜贖金的雙重性質(zhì)看船東與貨主的博弈[J];中國海商法年刊;2009年Z1期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 郭慶;索馬里海盜贖金性質(zhì)及保險(xiǎn)賠付研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：1805302