本文選題：信用證糾紛 + 法律適用��； 參考：《外交學(xué)院》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：信用證是國際貿(mào)易中的重要支付工具，在使用過程中經(jīng)常會(huì)發(fā)生糾紛，同時(shí)由于信用證的國際性，解決糾紛時(shí)往往會(huì)產(chǎn)生沖突法問題�？v觀國際實(shí)踐，有信用證專章立法的國家極少，對(duì)信用證糾紛法律適用規(guī)則做出規(guī)定的更是鮮見，本文主要探討信用證糾紛的法律適用問題，以期厘清信用證糾紛法律適用規(guī)則的脈絡(luò)。 本文在討論信用證法律性質(zhì)的基礎(chǔ)上，對(duì)信用證糾紛中不同法律關(guān)系進(jìn)行識(shí)別，信用證當(dāng)事人之間的法律關(guān)系應(yīng)定性為合同關(guān)系，信用證欺詐糾紛應(yīng)定性為侵權(quán)行為。對(duì)于當(dāng)事人之間法律關(guān)系的法律適用應(yīng)遵循“意思自治——最密切聯(lián)系”的原則，各國實(shí)踐都尊重當(dāng)事人的意思自治，但對(duì)最密切聯(lián)系地的判斷各有不同。信用證欺詐糾紛的法律適用應(yīng)依侵權(quán)行為地法律。 《最高人民法院關(guān)于審理信用證糾紛案件若干問題的規(guī)定》是我國關(guān)于信用證相關(guān)問題的司法解釋，其中對(duì)信用證糾紛的法律適用做出了規(guī)定，即尊重當(dāng)事人選擇國際慣例的意思自治，并在當(dāng)事人未做選擇時(shí)，，適用跟單信用證統(tǒng)一慣例或者其他相關(guān)國際慣例�！兑�(guī)定》有其特色，但也存在與法律規(guī)定有出入、與國際實(shí)踐不接軌等問題，因此，我國關(guān)于信用證糾紛法律適用的規(guī)定仍需在實(shí)踐和理論中不斷檢驗(yàn)，借鑒國際實(shí)踐不斷完善。
[Abstract]:Letter of credit is an important payment tool in international trade. Disputes often occur in the process of use. At the same time, conflicts of laws often arise when resolving disputes because of the international nature of letters of credit. Throughout the international practice, there are very few countries that have the legislation of the special chapter of the letter of credit, and there are few provisions on the applicable rules of the law applicable to the dispute of the letter of credit. This paper mainly discusses the legal application of the dispute of the letter of credit. In order to clarify the law applicable to the letter of credit dispute context. On the basis of discussing the legal nature of the letter of credit, this paper identifies the different legal relations in the dispute of the letter of credit. The legal relationship between the parties to the letter of credit should be characterized as a contractual relationship, and the dispute of fraud of the letter of credit should be characterized as an act of infringement. The legal application of the legal relationship between the parties should follow the principle of "autonomy of will-the closest connection". The practice of each country respects the autonomy of the party's will, but the judgment of the most closely connected place is different. The legal application of fraud dispute of letter of credit shall be in accordance with the law of the place of infringement. The provisions of the Supreme people's Court on several issues concerning the handling of disputes concerning Letters of Credit are judicial interpretations of issues related to letters of credit in China, which provide for the legal application of disputes over letters of credit. That is, to respect the autonomy of the parties in choosing international practices, and when the parties have not made the choice, to apply the uniform practice of documentary credits or other relevant international practices. [regulations] have their own characteristics, but there are also differences with the provisions of the law, Therefore, the provisions on the legal application of letter of credit disputes in our country still need to be constantly tested in practice and theory, and the international practice should be used for reference.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：外交學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294;D996.19

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 何智慧;淺析信用證法律性質(zhì)及其法律適用[J];重慶商學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年01期

2 劉瓊瑤;試析美國《統(tǒng)一商法典》中信用證的法律適用[J];長(zhǎng)沙大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2003年01期

3 馬偉;;信用證欺詐例外問題疏證——以欺詐例外的適用條件為視角[J];法律文獻(xiàn)信息與研究;2011年02期

4 梁鴻杰;趙鵬;;論信用證的獨(dú)立抽象原則[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年03期

5 任卉;;信用證欺詐法律問題研究[J];佳木斯大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年02期

6 杜新麗;;論國際慣例在我國涉外審判中的適用[J];人民司法;2005年09期

7 劉瓊瑤;試論國際信用證的法律適用[J];湖南省社會(huì)主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

8 徐冬根;;論信用證法律適用的發(fā)展新趨勢(shì)——以司法判例為視角[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

9 黃亞英,李薇薇;論國際信用證交易中準(zhǔn)據(jù)法的確定[J];中國法學(xué);2002年03期

本文編號(hào)：1800862