發(fā)布時間：2018-02-03 06:06

  本文關鍵詞： 網(wǎng)絡輿論 司法公正 沖突與協(xié)調(diào) 良性互動　出處：《山西大學》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：由于公眾在傳統(tǒng)媒體上評論司法審判活動的渠道阻塞性及網(wǎng)絡自身的優(yōu)越性,網(wǎng)絡越來越受到人們的喜愛,成為公眾評論案件,監(jiān)督司法審判活動的重要平臺。因此,網(wǎng)絡輿論也成為了監(jiān)督司法審判的重要方式和不可忽視的力量,其可以使司法案件備受關注,督促案件的審理趨向公開、公平和公正,通過其與司法審判形成良性互動,從而促進司法公正的實現(xiàn)。然而,一旦對網(wǎng)絡輿論不加任何限制和監(jiān)管而任由其表達,那么其必將干擾法官的判斷,影響司法審判的獨立性和公正性。因此,尋找到網(wǎng)絡輿論監(jiān)督與司法審判之間沖突的原因,如何有效化解網(wǎng)絡輿論監(jiān)督與司法審判之間的矛盾,實現(xiàn)網(wǎng)絡輿論與司法審判之間的良性互動,對于促進司法公正的實現(xiàn)具有重要的意義。 本文首先通過對輿論、正義等基本概念的考察、概括、總結和分析,得出網(wǎng)絡輿論監(jiān)督和司法公正的概念,為下文論證我國的網(wǎng)絡輿論監(jiān)督和司法公正打下了理論基礎。其次,通過對網(wǎng)絡輿論與司法審判沖突的表現(xiàn)形式的概括總結,來探求造成二者沖突的各種原因。網(wǎng)絡輿論在監(jiān)督司法審判過程中,由于網(wǎng)絡輿論和司法審判的固有屬性之不同,因此,網(wǎng)絡輿論與司法審判在案件事實認定標準、追求標準及對待案件態(tài)度上的差異導致了二者的沖突。然而,這在本質(zhì)上準確的體現(xiàn)了利益主體之間對于法的價值的不同追求而產(chǎn)生的沖突。所以,網(wǎng)絡輿論與司法公正沖突的本質(zhì)是網(wǎng)絡輿論與司法審判在自由與正義、自由與秩序、權利與權力等價值維度的沖突,這些價值沖突是可以調(diào)和的。最后,希望通過上述的理論分析,能夠準確定位網(wǎng)絡輿論,實現(xiàn)對網(wǎng)絡輿論的法律監(jiān)管,解決網(wǎng)絡輿論與司法審判的沖突并使它們形成良性互動,最終實現(xiàn)司法公正。網(wǎng)絡輿論的定位在于它只是滿足公眾知情權和自由表達公眾意愿的工具,網(wǎng)絡輿論關于司法審判的報道與評議只是在幫助公眾實現(xiàn)知情權和言論自由權,而其對司法活動的監(jiān)督只是由此產(chǎn)生的副產(chǎn)品。因此,網(wǎng)絡輿論的存在價值在于滿足公眾對司法審判信息的知情權,其職責在于客觀、全面、真實的報道和評價司法審判活動,監(jiān)督司法審判活動公開、公正、公平的進行。而司法審判的價值在于通過公開的審理,公正的判決,實現(xiàn)審判“三個效果”的統(tǒng)一來化解社會予盾,實現(xiàn)司法公正所以,網(wǎng)絡輿論監(jiān)督與司法審判的共同目標是一致的,即通過自身的努力來促進司法公正的實現(xiàn)。在實踐方面,希望可以為網(wǎng)絡輿論正確監(jiān)督司法審判,及對其自身的法律監(jiān)管提供理論依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:Because the public comments on the judicial activities in the traditional media channel obstruction and the advantages of the network itself, the network has become more and more popular and become a public comment cases. Therefore, the network of public opinion has become an important way to supervise the judicial trial and can not be ignored, it can make judicial cases receive much attention, urge the trial of cases tend to be open. Fairness and justice, through its benign interaction with the judicial trial, thereby promoting the realization of judicial justice. However, once the network of public opinion without any restrictions and supervision and let it express. So it will interfere with the judge's judgment and affect the independence and impartiality of the judicial trial. Therefore, find out the reason of the conflict between the network public opinion supervision and the judicial trial. How to effectively resolve the contradiction between network public opinion supervision and judicial trial and realize the benign interaction between network public opinion and judicial trial is of great significance to promote the realization of judicial justice. First of all, through the investigation of the basic concepts of public opinion, justice and other basic concepts, summarized, summarized and analyzed, the concept of network public opinion supervision and judicial justice is obtained. It lays a theoretical foundation for the following argumentation of our country's network public opinion supervision and judicial justice. Secondly, it summarizes the manifestation of the conflict between network public opinion and judicial trial. To explore the causes of the conflict between the two. Network public opinion in the process of supervision of judicial trial, because of the inherent nature of network public opinion and judicial trial is different, so. The differences between network public opinion and judicial trial in the standards of case fact determination, pursuit of standards and attitude towards cases lead to the conflict between the two. This in essence accurately reflects the conflict between the interests of the different pursuit of the value of law. Therefore, the essence of the conflict between network public opinion and judicial justice is the freedom and justice of network public opinion and judicial trial. Freedom and order, rights and power and other value dimensions of conflict, these value conflicts can be reconciled. Finally, I hope that through the above theoretical analysis, can accurately locate the network public opinion. Realize the legal supervision of network public opinion, resolve the conflict between network public opinion and judicial trial and make them form benign interaction. The orientation of network public opinion is that it is only a tool to satisfy the public's right to know and to express the public's will freely. The network public opinion about the judicial trial reports and comments only helps the public to realize the right to know and the right to freedom of expression, and its supervision of the judicial activities is only a by-product. The existence value of network public opinion lies in satisfying the public's right to know about judicial trial information, and its duty lies in objective, comprehensive and true reporting and evaluation of judicial trial activities, and in supervising the openness and fairness of judicial trial activities. The value of judicial trial lies in the realization of the unity of the "three effects" of trial through public trial, fair judgment, and the realization of judicial justice. The common goal of network public opinion supervision and judicial trial is the same, that is, through its own efforts to promote the realization of judicial justice. In practice, I hope to correctly supervise the judicial trial for the network public opinion. And its own legal supervision to provide the theoretical basis.
【學位授予單位】：山西大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D926;G206

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前9條

1 何源;網(wǎng)絡中的輿論監(jiān)督[J];當代傳播;2002年06期

2 裴曉軍;網(wǎng)絡新聞與輿論監(jiān)督[J];廣播電視大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2002年02期

3 譚偉;網(wǎng)絡輿論概念及特征[J];湖南社會科學;2003年05期

4 金霞;論網(wǎng)絡傳播的輿論監(jiān)督[J];湖北民族學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2003年02期

5 彭鵬;網(wǎng)絡輿論的功能及調(diào)控策略[J];南京政治學院學報;2005年03期

6 劉李明;馮云翔;;司法過程中的輿論模式及其現(xiàn)代性特質(zhì)[J];內(nèi)蒙古社會科學(漢文版);2006年03期

7 董莉;對“以事實為根據(jù)”原則中“事實”的再認識[J];江西社會科學;2002年08期

8 陳東升;沖突與權衡:法律價值選擇的方法論思考[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2003年01期

9 陳力丹;論網(wǎng)絡傳播的自由與控制[J];新聞與傳播研究;1999年03期

相關碩士學位論文 前4條

1 李海南;我國網(wǎng)絡輿論監(jiān)督現(xiàn)狀分析及對策研究[D];河北大學;2006年

2 白海濱;網(wǎng)絡輿論及其調(diào)控研究[D];西南大學;2008年

3 顏開云;網(wǎng)絡輿論監(jiān)督及其影響[D];暨南大學;2006年

4 黃佳鵬;網(wǎng)絡輿論監(jiān)督對司法過程的影響[D];黑龍江大學;2007年

，

本文編號：1486643