慢性腎臟病非透析患者血hs-cTnT、NT-proBNP、CK-MB評估心臟結(jié)構(gòu)功能的臨床價值比較
發(fā)布時間：2018-09-01 09:08
【摘要】：[目的]比較慢性腎臟病(chronic kidney disease, CKD)非透析患者血高敏心肌肌鈣蛋白T(hs-cTnT)、N末端B型利鈉肽原(NT-proBNP)、肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MB)指標水平在不同CKD分期的變化情況,以及比較三者在診斷心臟結(jié)構(gòu)功能的ROC曲線面積的準確性,為進一步尋找預(yù)測慢性腎臟病(CKD)非透析患者心臟結(jié)構(gòu)功能較為準確的心肌損傷標志物提供臨床依據(jù),以便為早期發(fā)現(xiàn)慢性腎臟病非透析患者心血管疾病提供一定價值。[方法]入選標準為昆明醫(yī)科大學第二附屬醫(yī)院腎臟內(nèi)科2015年1月-2017年1月慢性腎臟病非透析住院患者共137例,收集含有hs-cTnT、NT-proBNP、CK-MB指標的檢測資料,納入研究變量包括人口學及人體測量資料(性別、年齡、體重、血壓等)、納入腎臟原發(fā)疾病(原發(fā)慢性腎小球腎炎、高血壓腎損害、狼瘡性腎炎、梗阻性腎病、ANCA相關(guān)性腎炎等)。納入實驗室檢查指標包括高敏心肌肌鈣蛋白T(hs-cTnT)、N末端B型利鈉肽原(NT-proBNP)、肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MB)、總膽固醇(TC)、甘油三酯(TG)、血清高密度脂蛋白(HDL)、血清低密度脂蛋白(LDL)、血紅蛋白(Hb)、血肌酐(Scr)、血尿素氮(BUN)以及納入心臟超聲檢查指標等。選取同期到昆明醫(yī)科大學第二附屬醫(yī)院進行健康體檢人員29例,作為對照組。采用spss19.0進行數(shù)據(jù)分析,計量資料符合正態(tài)分布采用均數(shù)標準差進行表示,兩樣本間比較采用t檢驗,三個及以上樣本間比較采用單因素方差分析;計數(shù)資料采用率進行表示,采用卡方分析進行差異性檢驗,繪制ROC曲線對指標的診斷效能進行評價,由ROC曲線下面積綜合評價診斷準確性,以p0. 05表示有統(tǒng)計學意義。[結(jié)果]經(jīng)統(tǒng)計學分析不同CKD分組的病例組患者與健康對照組比較,在性別、年齡、BMI、TC、TG、HDL及LDL指標差異無統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05);在SP、DP、BUN、SCr指標上高于對照組,差異具有統(tǒng)計意義(p0.001),Hb、eGFR低于對照組,差異具有統(tǒng)計學意義(p0. 001)。CKD各組間比較:CKD5組與CKD3-4組患者Hb、eGFR指標較CKD1-2組降低,差異有統(tǒng)計意義(p0.001),SP、DP、BUN、SCr指標較CKD1-2組升高,差異有統(tǒng)計意義(p0. 001)。經(jīng)統(tǒng)計學分析,CKD1-2組血漿hs-cTnT、NT-proBNP、CK-MB指標水平與對照組比較指標差異無統(tǒng)計學意義,CKD3-4組與CKD5組血漿hs-cTnT、NT-proBNP、CK-MB指標水平升高,與對照組比較差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(p0.001),而CKD各組間比較:hs-cTnT在CKD3-4組與CKD1-2組之間比較差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(p0. 001), hs-cTnT在CKD5 組(0.2308±0. 1329)明顯高于 CKD1-2 組(0.0071 ±0.00641 )、CKD3-4組(0. 0324±0. 02664),差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(p0. 001 )。CK-MB 在 CKD3-4 組與CKDD1-2組之間比較差異無統(tǒng)計學意義,CKD5組(4.31±2.461)明顯高于CKD1-2組(1.66±1.475)、CKD3-4 組(2.31±1.554),差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(p0.001)。NT-proBNP在CKD3-4組與CKD1-2之間比較差異無統(tǒng)計學意義,在CKD5組(1054.21±241.70)明顯高于CKD1-2組(84.25±37.728)、CKD3-4組(475.08±388.761),差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(p0. 001)。CKD各組間比較:血hs-cTnT陽性率在CKD3-4組較CKD1-2組升高,差異具有統(tǒng)計學意義(p0. 001 ),CKD5組陽性率(56.7%),明顯高于CKD1-2組(5.7%)、CKD3-4組(28.6%),差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(p0.001)。NT-ProBNP陽性率在CKD3-4組與CKD1-2組之間比較,差異具有統(tǒng)計學意義(p0. 001 ),CKD5組陽性率(53. 3%)明顯高于CKD1-2組(0%)、CKD3-4組(11. 9%),差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(p0. 001 )。血清CK-MB陽性率在CKD3-4組與CKD1-2組之間比較,差異無統(tǒng)計學意義,CKD5組陽性率(30%)明顯高于CKD1-2組(2.8%)、CKD3-4組(4.7%),差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(p0.001)。不同CKD分期的患者在左室收縮功能不全指標(EF50%)指標上差異無統(tǒng)計學意義(p0. 05); CKD 各組間比較:CKD3-4 期組患者,LvDd、IVST、LAD、LVMI、E/A1、LVH指標較CKD1-2期升高,差異具有統(tǒng)計學意義(p0.001),LVEF指標下降,差異具有統(tǒng)計學意義(p0.001),CKD5組患者LvDd、IVST、LVPWT、LVMI指標較CKD3-4組升高,差異具有統(tǒng)計學意義(p0.001),LVEF指標下降,差異具有統(tǒng)計學意義(p0.001),CKD5 組患者 LvDd、IVST、LVPWT、LVMI、E/A1、LVH指標較CKD1-2組升高,差異具有統(tǒng)計學意義(p0.001),LVEF指標下降,差異具有統(tǒng)計學意義(p0. 001)。經(jīng)統(tǒng)計學分析伴有左心室肥厚CKD患者血漿hs-cTnT、NT-proBNP、CK-MB水平較無左心室肥厚、正常對照組顯著升高(p0.001),無左心室肥厚組hs-cTnT、NT-proBNP、CK-MB水平較正常對照組升高(p0. 001),伴有左室舒張功能不全的CKD患者血漿hs-cTnT、NT-proBNP、CK-MB水平較無左室舒張功能不全、正常對照組顯著升高(p0. 001),無左心室舒張功能不全組hs-cTnT、NT-proBNP、CK-MB水平較正常對照組升高(p0.001)。CKD患者血漿hs-cTnT、NT-proBNP、CK-MB水平,繪制受試者工作特征曲線評估左室肥厚。經(jīng)R0C曲線分析得,CK-MB預(yù)測概率:AUC=(0.818± 0.035 )(95%CI:0.749-0.887,p0.001),CK-MB評估左室肥厚準確率最高,其次NT-proBNP,hs-cTnT。根據(jù) CKD 患者血漿 hs-cTnT、NT-proBNP、CK-MB 水平,繪制受試者工作特征曲線評估左室舒張功能。經(jīng)ROC曲線分析得,CK-MB預(yù)測概率:AUC= (0.774±0. 048) (95%CI:0. 679-0.868, p0. 001),準確性最高是 CK-MB,其次 NT-proBNP, hs-cTnT。[結(jié)論]1. CKD非透析患者普遍存在心臟結(jié)構(gòu)與功能的改變。2. CKD非透析患者血漿hs-cTnT、NT-proBNP、CK-MB水平普遍升高,并且隨著腎功能惡化而進行性升高。3. CKD非透析患者血漿hs-cTnT、NT-proBNP、CK-MB水平與心臟結(jié)構(gòu)功能密切相關(guān),左室肥厚與左室舒張不全患者血hs-cTnT、NT-proBNP、CK-MB水平較無左室肥厚、無左室舒張功能不全及對照組顯著升高。4. CKD非透析患者血漿hs-cTnT、NT-proBNP、CK-MB診斷左室肥厚與左室舒張功能不全的R0C曲線面積,CK-MB準確性最高。檢測CK-MB可作為CKD早期心血管疾病的可靠指標之一。
[Abstract]:[Objective] To compare the changes of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and creatine kinase isoenzyme (CK-MB) in different CKD stages in non-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and to compare the accuracy of the three parameters in diagnosing the ROC curve area of cardiac structure and function. To find more accurate markers of myocardial damage for predicting cardiac structure and function in non-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), so as to provide some value for early detection of cardiovascular disease in non-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease. A total of 137 non-dialysis inpatients with chronic kidney disease in January 17 were enrolled in the study. The data of detection of hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP and CK-MB were collected. The included variables included demographic and anthropometric data (gender, age, weight, blood pressure, etc.) and included in the study were primary renal diseases (primary chronic glomerulonephritis, hypertensive nephropathy, lupus nephritis, obstructive nephropathy). Laboratory tests included high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), creatine kinase isoenzyme (CK-MB), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL), serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL), hemoglobin (Hb), serum creatinine (Scr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN). Twenty-nine health examinees from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University were selected as the control group. Data were analyzed by SPSS 19.0. The measurement data accorded with normal distribution was expressed by mean standard deviation. The comparison between the two samples was performed by t-test and the ratio of three or more samples was compared. Compared with the single factor analysis of variance, the counting data were expressed by the rate, the difference was tested by chi-square analysis, and the diagnostic efficiency of the indexes was evaluated by drawing ROC curve. The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by the area under the ROC curve, and the P0.05 was statistically significant. [Results] The patients with different CKD groups were statistically analyzed. Compared with the healthy control group, there was no significant difference in gender, age, BMI, TC, TG, HDL and LDL (P 0.05); SP, DP, BUN, SCr index was higher than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (p 0.001), Hb, eGFR was lower than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (p 0.001). CKD between the CKD 5 group and CKD 3-4 group Hb, eGFR index than CKD 1-2. The levels of plasma hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, CK-MB in CKD1-2 group were higher than those in CKD1-2 group, and the levels of plasma hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, CK-MB in CKD3-4 group and CKD5 group were higher than those in control group. There were significant differences between the control group (p0.001), and CKD groups: hs-cTnT in CKD 3-4 group and CKD 1-2 group were significantly different (p0.001). hs-cTnT in CKD 5 group (0.2308.1329) was significantly higher than CKD 1-2 group (0.0071.00641), CKD 3-4 group (0.0324.02664), the difference was statistically significant (p0.001). There was no significant difference between CKD3-4 group and CKDD1-2 group. CKD5 group (4.31+2.461) was significantly higher than CKD1-2 group (1.66+1.475) and CKD3-4 group (2.31+1.554), and the difference was statistically significant (p0.001). NT-proBNP had no significant difference between CKD3-4 group and CKD1-2 group, and CKD5 group (1054.21+241.70) was significantly higher than CKD1-2 group (84.25+37.70). The positive rate of hs-cTnT in CKD 3-4 group was higher than that in CKD 1-2 group, the difference was statistically significant (p0.001). The positive rate of CKD 5 group (56.7%) was significantly higher than that in CKD 1-2 group (5.7%) and CKD 3-4 group (28.6%). The positive rate of CKD5 group (53.3%) was significantly higher than CKD1-2 group (0%) and CKD3-4 group (11.9%). The difference was statistically significant (p0.001). The positive rate of serum CK-MB was significantly higher in CKD3-4 group than CKD1-2 group (30%). There was no significant difference in the index of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (EF50%) among the patients with different CKD stages (p0.05); CKD between the groups: CKD 3-4 group, LvDd, IVST, LAD, LVMI, E/A1, LVH index was higher than CKD 1-2 group, the difference was statistically significant (p0.001), LVEF index LvDd, IVST, LVPWT, LVMI in CKD5 group were higher than CKD3-4 group, the difference was statistically significant (p0.001), LVEF index decreased, the difference was statistically significant (p0.001), CKD5 group LvDd, IVST, LVPWT, LVMI, E/A1, LVH index was higher than CKD1-2 group, the difference was statistically significant (p0.001), LVEF index was significantly higher (p0.001). The levels of hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, CK-MB in CKD patients with left ventricular hypertrophy were significantly higher than those without left ventricular hypertrophy (p0.001). The levels of hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, CK-MB in CKD patients without left ventricular hypertrophy were significantly higher than those in CKD patients without left ventricular hypertrophy (p0.001). Plasma levels of hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, CK-MB in patients with CKD were significantly higher than those without left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (p0.001). The levels of hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP and CK-MB in patients without left ventricular diastolic dysfunction were significantly higher than those in normal controls (p0.001). The levels of hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, CK-MB in patients with CKD were significantly higher than those in normal controls (p0.001). Estimation of left ventricular hypertrophy by R0C curve analysis, CK-MB predictive probability: AUC = (0.818 + 0.035) (95% CI: 0.749-0.887, p0.001), CK-MB assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy the highest accuracy, followed by NT-proBNP, hs-cTnT. According to the plasma levels of hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, CK-MB in patients with CKD, draw the subjects'working characteristic curve to assess left ventricular diastolic function. The predictive probability of CK-MB: AUC = 0.774 (+ 0.048) (95% CI: 0.679-0.868, p0.001), the highest accuracy was CK-MB, followed by NT-proBNP, hs-cTnT. [Conclusion] 1. The changes of cardiac structure and function were prevalent in non-dialysis patients with CKD. 2. The levels of hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, CK-MB in non-dialysis patients with CKD generally increased, and progressed with the deterioration of renal function. The levels of hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, CK-MB in non-dialysis patients were closely related to cardiac structure and function. Left ventricular hypertrophy and left ventricular diastolic insufficiency patients had higher levels of hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, CK-MB than those without left ventricular hypertrophy, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and control group. 4. The levels of hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, CK-MB in non-dialysis patients with CKD were significantly higher than those without left ventricular diastolic insufficiency and control group CK-MB has the highest accuracy in the area of R0C curve between left ventricular hypertrophy and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.
【學位授予單位】：昆明醫(yī)科大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：R692
本文編號：2216722
[Abstract]:[Objective] To compare the changes of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and creatine kinase isoenzyme (CK-MB) in different CKD stages in non-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and to compare the accuracy of the three parameters in diagnosing the ROC curve area of cardiac structure and function. To find more accurate markers of myocardial damage for predicting cardiac structure and function in non-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), so as to provide some value for early detection of cardiovascular disease in non-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease. A total of 137 non-dialysis inpatients with chronic kidney disease in January 17 were enrolled in the study. The data of detection of hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP and CK-MB were collected. The included variables included demographic and anthropometric data (gender, age, weight, blood pressure, etc.) and included in the study were primary renal diseases (primary chronic glomerulonephritis, hypertensive nephropathy, lupus nephritis, obstructive nephropathy). Laboratory tests included high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), creatine kinase isoenzyme (CK-MB), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL), serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL), hemoglobin (Hb), serum creatinine (Scr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN). Twenty-nine health examinees from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University were selected as the control group. Data were analyzed by SPSS 19.0. The measurement data accorded with normal distribution was expressed by mean standard deviation. The comparison between the two samples was performed by t-test and the ratio of three or more samples was compared. Compared with the single factor analysis of variance, the counting data were expressed by the rate, the difference was tested by chi-square analysis, and the diagnostic efficiency of the indexes was evaluated by drawing ROC curve. The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by the area under the ROC curve, and the P0.05 was statistically significant. [Results] The patients with different CKD groups were statistically analyzed. Compared with the healthy control group, there was no significant difference in gender, age, BMI, TC, TG, HDL and LDL (P 0.05); SP, DP, BUN, SCr index was higher than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (p 0.001), Hb, eGFR was lower than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (p 0.001). CKD between the CKD 5 group and CKD 3-4 group Hb, eGFR index than CKD 1-2. The levels of plasma hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, CK-MB in CKD1-2 group were higher than those in CKD1-2 group, and the levels of plasma hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, CK-MB in CKD3-4 group and CKD5 group were higher than those in control group. There were significant differences between the control group (p0.001), and CKD groups: hs-cTnT in CKD 3-4 group and CKD 1-2 group were significantly different (p0.001). hs-cTnT in CKD 5 group (0.2308.1329) was significantly higher than CKD 1-2 group (0.0071.00641), CKD 3-4 group (0.0324.02664), the difference was statistically significant (p0.001). There was no significant difference between CKD3-4 group and CKDD1-2 group. CKD5 group (4.31+2.461) was significantly higher than CKD1-2 group (1.66+1.475) and CKD3-4 group (2.31+1.554), and the difference was statistically significant (p0.001). NT-proBNP had no significant difference between CKD3-4 group and CKD1-2 group, and CKD5 group (1054.21+241.70) was significantly higher than CKD1-2 group (84.25+37.70). The positive rate of hs-cTnT in CKD 3-4 group was higher than that in CKD 1-2 group, the difference was statistically significant (p0.001). The positive rate of CKD 5 group (56.7%) was significantly higher than that in CKD 1-2 group (5.7%) and CKD 3-4 group (28.6%). The positive rate of CKD5 group (53.3%) was significantly higher than CKD1-2 group (0%) and CKD3-4 group (11.9%). The difference was statistically significant (p0.001). The positive rate of serum CK-MB was significantly higher in CKD3-4 group than CKD1-2 group (30%). There was no significant difference in the index of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (EF50%) among the patients with different CKD stages (p0.05); CKD between the groups: CKD 3-4 group, LvDd, IVST, LAD, LVMI, E/A1, LVH index was higher than CKD 1-2 group, the difference was statistically significant (p0.001), LVEF index LvDd, IVST, LVPWT, LVMI in CKD5 group were higher than CKD3-4 group, the difference was statistically significant (p0.001), LVEF index decreased, the difference was statistically significant (p0.001), CKD5 group LvDd, IVST, LVPWT, LVMI, E/A1, LVH index was higher than CKD1-2 group, the difference was statistically significant (p0.001), LVEF index was significantly higher (p0.001). The levels of hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, CK-MB in CKD patients with left ventricular hypertrophy were significantly higher than those without left ventricular hypertrophy (p0.001). The levels of hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, CK-MB in CKD patients without left ventricular hypertrophy were significantly higher than those in CKD patients without left ventricular hypertrophy (p0.001). Plasma levels of hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, CK-MB in patients with CKD were significantly higher than those without left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (p0.001). The levels of hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP and CK-MB in patients without left ventricular diastolic dysfunction were significantly higher than those in normal controls (p0.001). The levels of hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, CK-MB in patients with CKD were significantly higher than those in normal controls (p0.001). Estimation of left ventricular hypertrophy by R0C curve analysis, CK-MB predictive probability: AUC = (0.818 + 0.035) (95% CI: 0.749-0.887, p0.001), CK-MB assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy the highest accuracy, followed by NT-proBNP, hs-cTnT. According to the plasma levels of hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, CK-MB in patients with CKD, draw the subjects'working characteristic curve to assess left ventricular diastolic function. The predictive probability of CK-MB: AUC = 0.774 (+ 0.048) (95% CI: 0.679-0.868, p0.001), the highest accuracy was CK-MB, followed by NT-proBNP, hs-cTnT. [Conclusion] 1. The changes of cardiac structure and function were prevalent in non-dialysis patients with CKD. 2. The levels of hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, CK-MB in non-dialysis patients with CKD generally increased, and progressed with the deterioration of renal function. The levels of hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, CK-MB in non-dialysis patients were closely related to cardiac structure and function. Left ventricular hypertrophy and left ventricular diastolic insufficiency patients had higher levels of hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, CK-MB than those without left ventricular hypertrophy, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and control group. 4. The levels of hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, CK-MB in non-dialysis patients with CKD were significantly higher than those without left ventricular diastolic insufficiency and control group CK-MB has the highest accuracy in the area of R0C curve between left ventricular hypertrophy and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.
【學位授予單位】：昆明醫(yī)科大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：R692
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 馬忠超;李雪;楊瑞衡;洪虹;劉澤煒;王懷國;;超聲心動圖評價透析方式對終末期腎臟病心臟結(jié)構(gòu)及功能的影響[J];中國血液凈化;2016年11期
2 易小艷;匡金石;胡飛躍;;ROC曲線下評估NT-proBNP與心-腎綜合征的關(guān)系[J];中國現(xiàn)代醫(yī)生;2016年30期
3 田佳;;慢性腎臟病患者心肌肥厚相關(guān)危險因素分析[J];陜西醫(yī)學雜志;2016年09期
4 周楊;王瑞娟;呂穎;宓恩娜;;血NT-ProBNP對CKD非透析患者有效循環(huán)血容量評價的研究[J];中國中西醫(yī)結(jié)合腎病雜志;2016年04期
5 顧?quán)l(xiāng);馬清;陳海平;李敏;;慢性腎臟病心血管并發(fā)癥及相關(guān)危險因素研究進展[J];中國中西醫(yī)結(jié)合腎病雜志;2016年02期
6 黃燕萍;奚敏慧;張彬;張旦歡;毛佩菊;;慢性腎臟病患者左心室肥厚的影響因素[J];中國中西醫(yī)結(jié)合腎病雜志;2015年11期
7 肖文凱;葉平;;慢性腎臟病患者血清高敏肌鈣蛋白T水平變化及意義[J];中華老年心腦血管病雜志;2015年05期
8 黃政;方存明;程久佩;馬小林;;超敏肌鈣蛋白T與慢性心力衰竭患者心功能及預(yù)后的關(guān)系[J];浙江臨床醫(yī)學;2014年12期
9 林麗容;黃明生;林石生;;慢性腎病患者血肌酐含量檢測及其與心功能損害的關(guān)系[J];海南醫(yī)學院學報;2015年01期
10 毛永輝;趙班;陳歡;賈鶯梅;李天慧;;腹膜透析患者血清N末端前體腦鈉肽水平的變化及影響因素探討[J];中國血液凈化;2014年10期
，本文編號：2216722
本文鏈接：http://www.lk138.cn/yixuelunwen/mjlw/2216722.html
最近更新
教材專著
