本文選題：土工格室 + 生態(tài)護(hù)坡��； 參考：《南昌工程學(xué)院》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著世界科學(xué)技術(shù)的進(jìn)步與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展,全球的環(huán)境問題將變得越來越嚴(yán)峻。近些年來,我國用于高速公路、河道、鐵路以及山區(qū)高等級公路的工程項(xiàng)目如雨后春筍般大量涌現(xiàn),這促使人工邊坡工程大量的出現(xiàn)。然而,這些邊坡大多數(shù)都存在水土流失、沖刷侵蝕以及淺層的局部滑坡等情況。如果對這些邊坡不加以處理的話,輕者會造成生態(tài)環(huán)境的失衡,嚴(yán)重的時(shí)候,甚至可能會造成泥石流以及山體滑坡,這無疑將會對人民的財(cái)產(chǎn)甚至是生命帶來巨大的傷害。邊坡生態(tài)系統(tǒng)一旦遭到破壞,其在三、五年內(nèi)甚至可能是更長的時(shí)間內(nèi)都不能復(fù)原。因此,怎么樣能夠快速地恢復(fù)邊坡的生態(tài)環(huán)境以及達(dá)到坡面植被保護(hù)的目的,這是目前迫切需要研究并解決的難題。河道傳統(tǒng)護(hù)坡型式如:干砌石護(hù)坡、漿砌石護(hù)坡以及噴混凝土護(hù)坡等。這些傳統(tǒng)護(hù)坡型式雖然護(hù)坡性較好,但是其會對生態(tài)環(huán)境造成破壞,使生態(tài)失去平衡。傳統(tǒng)護(hù)坡型式甚至?xí)购恿骷皟砂蹲晕艺{(diào)節(jié)以及凈化的能力大大削弱。由此,一種新型的護(hù)坡型式應(yīng)運(yùn)而生一一生態(tài)護(hù)坡。生態(tài)護(hù)坡主要是由工程措施和植被保護(hù)相結(jié)合的一種護(hù)坡型式。它可以有效地提高岸坡景觀,創(chuàng)造一個(gè)綠色的生態(tài)環(huán)境,以達(dá)到護(hù)坡與綠化完美的結(jié)合。土工格室植草護(hù)坡作為生態(tài)護(hù)坡技術(shù)的一種,近幾年來,發(fā)展十分的迅速。土工格室植草護(hù)坡不只是能夠減緩水土流失,而且能夠改善生態(tài)環(huán)境,其固土性能優(yōu)良、消能作用明顯。探其緣由是因?yàn)橥凉じ袷易o(hù)坡是一種與植被相結(jié)合的新型護(hù)坡型式。土工格室護(hù)坡不但能夠減少雨水濺蝕以及坡面徑流與河道水流的沖刷,植物的根系還具有排水的作用、加筋以及錨固土體的功效;從其他角度來看,土工格室護(hù)坡還可以綠化邊坡,有助于修復(fù)邊坡的生態(tài)環(huán)境。土工格室護(hù)坡目前在鐵路、公路等建設(shè)項(xiàng)目中得到了越來越普遍的應(yīng)用。土工格室生態(tài)護(hù)坡應(yīng)用于小河流當(dāng)中不但能夠美化環(huán)境,降低污染,并降低工程造價(jià),同時(shí)也可以有效的起到加固河岸的作用。本文通過人工模擬降雨試驗(yàn)以及現(xiàn)場護(hù)岸河流沖刷試驗(yàn)來分析土工格室的性能。并對土工格室護(hù)岸保土抗沖刷性能進(jìn)行研究分析得到以下結(jié)論:依據(jù)在工程中常用的三種坡比進(jìn)行人工降雨模擬實(shí)驗(yàn),得到在50mm/h雨強(qiáng)下土工格室護(hù)岸的臨界坡比介于1:1.5到1:2.5之間的結(jié)論。土工格室護(hù)坡具有較好的保土抗沖刷性,在施工條件一定的情況下,土工格室框格越小其保土性能越好。土工格室護(hù)岸隨著其坡面位置下降,其受河流沖刷的可能性越大;其受河流沖刷的頻率越大、時(shí)間越長,其土體越容易損失。其土工格室護(hù)岸植被形成后,植被覆蓋度越好,其保土抗沖刷性越好。研究成果被應(yīng)用于黎川示范區(qū)小河流護(hù)坡中。通過實(shí)際工程中的應(yīng)用,觀察土工格室護(hù)岸的實(shí)際情況,并結(jié)合理論與試驗(yàn)得出結(jié)論:土工格室生態(tài)護(hù)岸能夠應(yīng)用用小河流當(dāng)中。
[Abstract]:With the progress of science and technology and economic development in the world, the global environmental problems will become more and more serious. In recent years, a large number of projects used in highway, river, railway and high grade highway in mountainous areas have sprung up in our country, which promote the emergence of artificial slope engineering. However, soil erosion, erosion and local landslides occur in most of these slopes. If these slopes are not treated, the lighter will cause the imbalance of the ecological environment. In serious cases, it may even cause mudslides and landslides, which will undoubtedly bring great harm to people's property and even to their lives. Once damaged, slope ecosystems cannot be restored for three, five years or possibly longer. Therefore, how to quickly restore the ecological environment of the slope and achieve the purpose of vegetation protection on the slope is an urgent problem to be studied and solved. Traditional river slope protection types such as dry stone slope protection, masonry slope protection and shotcrete slope protection and so on. Although these traditional slope protection types have good slope protection, they will destroy the ecological environment and make the ecology out of balance. Traditional slope protection may even weaken the ability of rivers and banks to self-regulate and purify. As a result, a new type of slope protection came into being-ecological slope protection. Ecological slope protection is a kind of slope protection combined with engineering measures and vegetation protection. It can effectively improve the slope landscape, create a green ecological environment, in order to achieve a perfect combination of slope protection and greening. As a kind of ecological slope protection technology, the development of geotechnical compartment slope protection is very rapid in recent years. The slope protection not only can reduce soil erosion, but also can improve the ecological environment. The soil consolidation performance is good and the energy dissipation is obvious. The reason is that geoglass slope protection is a new type of slope protection combined with vegetation. GeoCell slope protection can not only reduce Rain Water splashing and erosion of slope runoff and river flow, but also has the function of drainage, reinforcement and anchoring of soil; from other angles, the plant root system also has the function of draining, reinforcing and anchoring soil. Geotechnical compartment slope protection can also greening the slope, which is helpful to repair the ecological environment of the slope. Geotechnical compartment slope protection is more and more widely used in railway, highway and other construction projects. The application of geogrid ecological slope protection in small rivers can not only beautify the environment, reduce pollution, and reduce the project cost, but also play an effective role in strengthening the river banks. In this paper, the performance of geogrid chamber is analyzed by artificial rainfall simulation test and river scour test. The following conclusions are obtained: according to the three kinds of slope ratios commonly used in engineering, artificial rainfall simulation experiments are carried out. It is concluded that the critical slope ratio of geotechnical compartment revetment under 50mm/h rain intensity is between 1: 1.5 and 1: 2.5. The slope protection of geogroups has better soil protection and erosion resistance. Under certain construction conditions, the smaller the space frame is, the better the soil conservation performance is. With the decrease of the slope position of the geotechnical compartment, the more likely it is to be scoured by the river, and the more the frequency and time of the river scour, the more easily the soil can be lost. After the formation of revetment vegetation, the better the vegetation coverage, the better the soil erosion resistance. The research results are applied to slope protection of small rivers in Lichuan demonstration area. Through the application of practical engineering, the actual situation of geotechnical compartment bank protection is observed, and combined with theory and experiment, it is concluded that geoglass ecological bank revetment can be used in small rivers.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌工程學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：TV861

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張瑛;;河道生態(tài)護(hù)坡技術(shù)研究進(jìn)展及其在蘇南地區(qū)的應(yīng)用[J];污染防治技術(shù);2015年03期

2 翁乃蔚;;城市河道整治中生態(tài)型護(hù)坡結(jié)構(gòu)探討[J];水利科技與經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年11期

3 丹建軍;張社祥;成益洋;;河道治理工程項(xiàng)目的施工技術(shù)探討[J];科技資訊;2013年30期

4 何文斌;;土工格室護(hù)坡的施工工藝[J];交通世界(建養(yǎng).機(jī)械);2013年07期

5 王廣月;王杏花;魏金祥;;土工格室坡面侵蝕特性[J];應(yīng)用基礎(chǔ)與工程科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2013年02期

6 王玉潔;;邊坡防護(hù)的形式及其優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)[J];交通世界(運(yùn)輸.車輛);2012年12期

7 王廣月;韓燕;王杏花;;降雨條件下土工格室柔性護(hù)坡的穩(wěn)定性分析[J];巖土力學(xué);2012年10期

8 韓雷;趙進(jìn)勇;田振華;左蓓蓓;;植被護(hù)坡在水流沖刷作用下的穩(wěn)定性研究進(jìn)展[J];中國水利;2012年18期

9 趙玉麗;牛健植;;人工模擬降雨試驗(yàn)降雨特性及問題分析[J];水土保持研究;2012年04期

10 肖成志;孫建誠;李雨潤;劉曉朋;;三維土工網(wǎng)墊植草護(hù)坡防坡面徑流沖刷的機(jī)制分析[J];巖土力學(xué);2011年02期

，

本文編號：1904641