【摘要】：如果說“臺北文學(xué)”具有或淺或深的中國意識,那“南部文學(xué)”更多的是強(qiáng)調(diào)臺灣意識乃至臺獨(dú)意識。他們在黨外政治運(yùn)動的配合下,不斷質(zhì)疑解構(gòu)陳映真的“在臺灣的中國文學(xué)”這一經(jīng)典定義,處處強(qiáng)調(diào)南臺灣與北臺灣在政治與價值觀念的“南轅北轍”,用各人的不同方式向“臺北即臺灣”的這種政治和文化神話挑戰(zhàn)。在批評方法上,“南部”評論家顛覆了“北部”評論家的學(xué)院書寫方式。
[Abstract]:If "Taipei Literature" has either shallow or deep Chinese consciousness, then "Southern Literature" emphasizes Taiwan consciousness and even Taiwan independence consciousness. With the cooperation of the non-party political movement, they constantly questioned the classical definition of deconstructing Chen Yingzhen's "Chinese literature in Taiwan," and stressed everywhere that South Taiwan and North Taiwan are "diametrically different" in politics and values. Challenge the political and cultural mythology of Taipei, Taiwan, in different ways. In terms of critical methods, the Southern critics overturned the College Writing style of the Northern critics.
，

本文編號：2317385