【摘要】：古巴導(dǎo)彈危機(jī)的高潮過(guò)后,蘇美古三國(guó)開(kāi)始通過(guò)談判來(lái)消除危機(jī),導(dǎo)彈危機(jī)進(jìn)入了第二個(gè)階段。蘇美代表都宣稱談判應(yīng)以危機(jī)高潮期間兩國(guó)首腦在通信中達(dá)成的"協(xié)議"為基礎(chǔ),而實(shí)際上兩國(guó)首腦在通信中只是各自闡述了雙方應(yīng)承擔(dān)的義務(wù),并沒(méi)有達(dá)成一份相互確認(rèn)的"協(xié)議",且信中對(duì)在履行這些義務(wù)時(shí)所必然會(huì)遇到的諸多細(xì)節(jié)問(wèn)題未能涉及,同時(shí)古巴方面宣稱不接受蘇美首腦在通信中所談的那些義務(wù),并提出談判應(yīng)在卡斯特羅所提五點(diǎn)要求的基礎(chǔ)上來(lái)進(jìn)行。因此,三國(guó)關(guān)于消除危機(jī)的談判進(jìn)行得異常艱難。在談判的過(guò)程中,美蘇兩國(guó)都使用了威脅和引誘的手段,同時(shí)蘇美古三國(guó)均不同程度地體諒了對(duì)方的難處和不同程度地向?qū)Ψ阶髁俗尣?最后在一系列問(wèn)題上達(dá)成了協(xié)議,并通過(guò)聯(lián)合國(guó)確認(rèn)了危機(jī)的消除。
[Abstract]:After the climax of the Cuban missile crisis, the three countries began to negotiate to eliminate the crisis, and the missile crisis entered the second stage. Representatives of the Soviet Union and the United States both claimed that the talks should be based on the "agreement" reached by the heads of state of the two countries in correspondence during the climax of the crisis. In fact, the heads of state of the two countries only stated their respective obligations in the correspondence. There was no mutually confirmed "agreement", and the letter failed to address the many details that must have been encountered in fulfilling those obligations, while Cuba declared that it did not accept the obligations that the Soviet-American leaders had mentioned in their communications, The talks should be based on Castro's five-point demands. As a result, negotiations among the three countries on the elimination of the crisis have been extremely difficult. In the course of the negotiations, both the United States and the Soviet Union used threats and inducements. At the same time, the Soviet Union, the United States and Cuba, to varying degrees of understanding of each other's difficulties and concessions to each other, finally reached agreement on a series of issues. The resolution of the crisis was confirmed through the United Nations.
【作者單位】： 《濰坊學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)》;
【分類號(hào)】：K153

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 雷志宇;古巴導(dǎo)彈危機(jī)的前世今生[J];南風(fēng)窗;2002年23期

2 韓洪文;論古巴導(dǎo)彈危機(jī)及其后果[J];聊城師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1997年02期

3 趙艷;近年學(xué)術(shù)界關(guān)于古巴導(dǎo)彈危機(jī)研究述評(píng)[J];陜西師范大學(xué)繼續(xù)教育學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

4 吳文成;梁占軍;;古巴導(dǎo)彈危機(jī)中的官僚位置與決策[J];國(guó)際政治科學(xué);2006年04期

5 ;《千鈞一發(fā)——古巴導(dǎo)彈危機(jī)紀(jì)實(shí)》[J];拉丁美洲研究;1999年04期

6 謝爾蓋·赫魯曉夫;王迪;;無(wú)線電波化解了“古巴導(dǎo)彈危機(jī)”[J];書(shū)摘;2002年12期

7 于江欣;古巴導(dǎo)彈危機(jī)及其影響[J];軍事歷史;2004年04期

8 時(shí)曉紅;古巴導(dǎo)彈危機(jī)對(duì)國(guó)際關(guān)系的影響[J];湛江師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1996年03期

9 陶忠華;沈麗娜;;新華社原副社長(zhǎng)龐炳庵談古巴導(dǎo)彈危機(jī)見(jiàn)聞[J];檔案與建設(shè);2013年07期

10 伊萬(wàn)·西多羅夫;彭華;;“美國(guó)人褲子里的刺猬”——古巴導(dǎo)彈危機(jī)紀(jì)實(shí)[J];時(shí)代教育(先鋒國(guó)家歷史);2007年22期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 呂虹 編譯;《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》:慢鏡頭的古巴導(dǎo)彈危機(jī)[N];社會(huì)科學(xué)報(bào);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉勇為;英國(guó)對(duì)古巴導(dǎo)彈危機(jī)的反應(yīng)與處理[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2303251