漢唐時(shí)期盜墓現(xiàn)象研究
[Abstract]:Tombs are the ultimate destination of human body and spirit, which contain rich social, historical, religious and other cultural information, and some grave building materials such as stone, brick, burial objects such as town tomb figurines, sword, etc. Mirror is the materialized form of these cultural information. Grave theft is not only directly related to these material contents, but also to spiritual belief. The historical facts of tomb theft in Han and Tang dynasties can be classified into three categories based on the identity of the subject of tomb theft: the political tomb making led by the official government, the army as the main participants in the army digging for graves, and the folk theft by individuals or groups. Classifying the historical facts of tomb theft on the basis of subject is helpful for us to further explore the motive of this phenomenon and the measures to deal with it. Based on the historical background of the grave-robbing events in the Han and Tang dynasties, this paper analyzes the actual driving force of the grave-robbing activities, the psychological motives of the grave-robbing activities and the belief factors of the gods. The realistic driving force is mainly the pursuit of economic interests, while the psychological motivation is the abnormal psychological factor of the grave robbers, and the immortals' belief factors are mainly the influence of Taoist ghosts and gods belief on the behavior of grave robbers. The three motivations are not unrelated, but interact and motivate each other in a common context. And the phenomenon of tomb theft coexist with the corresponding anti-grave theft measures. It mainly includes the anti-theft measures of the graveyard itself, such as the creation of the mausoleum system and some changes in the graveyard system, and so on; it has appeared since the pre-Qin period, written in the Han Dynasty, and has tended to mature in the Tang Dynasty. Religious persuasion based on the doctrine of Taoism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類號(hào)】:K878.8
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳霞;;兩性皇權(quán)話面衣——漢唐時(shí)期女子面衣審美探尋[J];南京藝術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(美術(shù)與設(shè)計(jì)版);2011年03期
2 王鋒鈞;;漢唐時(shí)期關(guān)中農(nóng)業(yè)與京都長(zhǎng)安[J];農(nóng)業(yè)考古;2011年04期
3 陸曉平;;古道拾遺:黔陽古城國(guó)家級(jí)碑刻文物偶遇記——專訪湘西著名古玩專家夏安[J];建筑與文化;2011年07期
4 林正秋;;漢唐時(shí)期的“飯稻羹魚”[J];杭州(生活品質(zhì)版);2011年07期
5 薛正昌;;定戎寨鹽池與宋夏戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)——兼論鹽文化[J];西夏研究;2010年01期
6 馮立軍;夏福順;;略述清代以前中國(guó)與柬埔寨的香藥貿(mào)易[J];南洋問題研究;2011年02期
7 王焱;楊鴻冕;;不同時(shí)期漢語外來詞特點(diǎn)與社會(huì)心理[J];長(zhǎng)春理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年07期
8 丁永剛;;西安“世界歷史文化名城”的復(fù)興之路[J];城市觀察;2011年03期
9 王瑩;劉進(jìn)鎖;;音樂人類學(xué)視野下的西府曲子之歷史演變[J];新西部(下旬.理論版);2011年08期
10 ;[J];;年期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條
1 李t,
本文編號(hào):2208020
本文鏈接:http://www.lk138.cn/shekelunwen/kgx/2208020.html