【摘要】：刑訊逼供曾經(jīng)作為國(guó)家司法機(jī)關(guān)獲取犯罪嫌疑人口供的有效方式而合法存在。隨著社會(huì)的進(jìn)步、人類文明的發(fā)展，刑訊逼供因其巨大的危害性，為世界各國(guó)所明令禁止，受到了現(xiàn)實(shí)的批判和法律的懲處。然而司法實(shí)踐中，刑訊逼供卻屢禁不止。 作為一名生活在注重保障人權(quán)時(shí)代的現(xiàn)代人，更作為一名法律學(xué)人，對(duì)此現(xiàn)象倍感憂慮。盡管已有眾多人士對(duì)此問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了深入研究，仍然不揣淺陋，將此作為自己的畢業(yè)論文選題。因?yàn)槲蚁嘈牛灰逃嵄乒┪磸乃痉▽?shí)踐中銷聲匿跡，對(duì)此問(wèn)題的關(guān)注就是必須的。 本文除了前言及結(jié)語(yǔ)之外，共分三大部分： 第一部分概述，主要論述了刑事訴訟中偵查訊問(wèn)的目的及其必要性：偵查訊問(wèn)既有利于偵查破案，又有利于保護(hù)犯罪嫌疑人的合法權(quán)益。然而司法實(shí)踐中訊問(wèn)卻被異化為刑訊逼供，，進(jìn)而對(duì)刑訊逼供進(jìn)行了界定，大致討論了其歷史、現(xiàn)狀以及危害。 第二部分探索刑訊逼供屢禁不止的原因。刑訊逼供廣泛存在于司法實(shí)踐中，既有其社會(huì)根源，更有其制度根源。中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)的儒家思想、為廣大民眾所信奉的佛教因果報(bào)應(yīng)論以及歷來(lái)偏差的訴訟價(jià)值理念，使得刑訊逼供有著深厚的社會(huì)根源。而觀念決定態(tài)度，強(qiáng)調(diào)打擊犯罪的出發(fā)點(diǎn)使得我國(guó)刑事訴訟制度一方面賦予偵查機(jī)關(guān)幾乎無(wú)所限制的權(quán)力，另一方面卻相對(duì)匱于對(duì)犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的人權(quán)給予保護(hù)。兩相夾擊，刑訊逼供因而頻頻現(xiàn)身。 第三部分筆者針對(duì)刑訊逼供的產(chǎn)生原因，提出了遏制刑訊逼供的措施。遏
[Abstract]:The extortion of confession by torture was an effective way to obtain the confession of criminal suspects by the state judiciary. With the progress of the society, the development of the human civilization, the extortion of confession by torture, because of its great harmfulness, was forbidden by all countries in the world and punished by the realistic criticism and the law. However, in judicial practice, the extortion of confession by torture has been banned repeatedly. Not only.
As a modern man who lives in the era of safeguarding human rights, he is more concerned about the phenomenon. Although many people have studied this problem deeply, we still don't think so, because I believe that as long as torture does not disappear from judicial practice, I believe that, The concern of this question is necessary.
In addition to the preface and conclusion, this paper is divided into three parts:
The first part is an overview of the purpose and necessity of investigation and interrogation in criminal proceedings. Investigation and interrogation not only benefit the investigation of cases, but also help to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the criminal suspects. However, interrogation in judicial practice is dissimilated as extorting the confession by torture, and then defines the forced confession of torture, and roughly discusses its history and present situation. And harm.
The second part explores the cause of repeated prohibition of extorting confession by torture. Extorting confession from torture widely exists in judicial practice, which has its social root and its institutional root. On the one hand, the criminal procedure system of our country has given the investigative organs almost unlimited power, on the other hand, it is relative to the protection of the human rights of the criminal suspects and the accused, and the two phase attack and the extortion of confession by torture are frequent.
In the third part, the author puts forward some measures to curb extorting confession by torture.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類號(hào)】：D917

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王璞;論刑訊逼供及其遏制[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2011年

2 王衛(wèi)光;刑訊逼供原因及其預(yù)防[D];山東大學(xué);2012年

本文編號(hào)：2143068