發(fā)布時間：2018-05-10 17:56

  本文選題：森佩爾 + 形式原則�。� 參考：《南京大學》2013年博士論文

【摘要】：《風格論》是森佩爾建筑理論最重要的成果。它奠定了森佩爾在建筑理論界的地位,同時,關(guān)于森佩爾建筑理論的諸多爭議也多由這本書引發(fā)。在諸多爭議中,立場最多樣并且涉及建筑議題最多的是對森佩爾建筑理論和各時期關(guān)系的爭論。 本文認為,只有找到森佩爾建筑理論中可以涵蓋諸多議題的基本主題,并且將研究對象拓展到《風格論》之前的文本,同時還要納入更廣闊的背景才能獲取對森佩爾建筑理論正確且相對全面的理解,進而對諸多爭議作出不偏頗的評判。由此,本文提取出“形式原則”作為主題,選取《風格論》之前的《彩飾初論》、《四要素》,對三個文本的形式原則進行比較研究。 根據(jù)森佩爾文本和其同時代形式原則討論的總體關(guān)系,可以將形式原則分為結(jié)構(gòu)形態(tài)原則、非結(jié)構(gòu)形態(tài)原則和表面屬性原則三大類。本文的第二、三、四章分別討論了這三類形式原則。在各章之中,都遵循先分別討論森佩爾文本的形式原則以及各時期相關(guān)議題,再討論森佩爾文本和各時期相關(guān)議題的關(guān)系,繼而揭示森佩爾文本之間關(guān)系的論述順序。對各類形式原則作分別論述后,本文的第五章將形式原則視作整體,討論各類形式原則之間的關(guān)系、森佩爾文本形式原則論證和考古實證的關(guān)系、森佩爾文本和同時代成果的關(guān)系。第五章的討論起著承上啟下的作用,其中揭示的問題說明需要將論述作進一步提升,而第六章正是在更高的觀念層面討論森佩爾文本的形式原則。 本文論述最顯見的成果是闡明森佩爾不同時期文本在不同層面上和各時期建筑思想的關(guān)系,以此揭示出森佩爾三個文本之間延續(xù)和變化的具體關(guān)系,得出森佩爾建筑理論的發(fā)展脈絡(luò)。此外,論文有三個主要結(jié)論。第一：《彩飾初論》在形式原則設(shè)定對象、形式原則的立場以及形式原則的論證方式上都和后兩個文本有密切的關(guān)聯(lián)。并且,森佩爾最初建立編織術(shù)和圍合要素的關(guān)系以及古希臘文化和非歐文化的關(guān)系都和彩飾論證明有關(guān)。第二：森佩爾建筑理論相對于同時代建筑界的諸多“特性”,實質(zhì)上卻源于對同時代其他學科諸多“共性”的更積極回應(yīng)。第三：森佩爾建筑理論所呈現(xiàn)的“超前”于同時代建筑思想的特征,一部分源于探求歷史原貌的強烈意圖,一部分源于對傳統(tǒng)建筑學學科界定方式的回歸。換言之,這些“超前”的特征居然源于“滯后”于同時代發(fā)展的森佩爾個人思想。 最終,論文回到研究緣起中關(guān)于森佩爾建筑理論和各時期關(guān)系的討論,對它們的拓展性評判再次證明了將研究回歸到森佩爾文本自身的重要性。 論文全文約253,000字(其中正文約231,000字),插圖165幅。
[Abstract]:Style Theory is the most important achievement of Sembell's architectural theory. It establishes the position of Sembell in the field of architectural theory, at the same time, many controversies about the theory of architecture are caused by this book. Among all the controversies, the most controversial and the most involved in architectural issues are the Sembell's architectural theory and the relationship between different periods. This paper argues that only by finding the basic theme of many topics can be found in Sembell's architectural theory, and extending the research object to the previous text of "stylistic Theory". At the same time, we should include a broader background in order to get a correct and relatively comprehensive understanding of Sembell's architectural theory, and then make an unbiased judgment on many controversies. Therefore, this paper extracts "the principle of form" as the theme, selects the "preliminary Theory of Color ornaments" and "four elements" before "style Theory", and makes a comparative study of the formal principles of the three texts. According to the general relationship between Sembell's text and its contemporary principle of form, the principle of form can be divided into three categories: the principle of structural form, the principle of non-structural form and the principle of surface attribute. The second, third and fourth chapters of this paper discuss these three kinds of formal principles respectively. In each chapter, we first discuss the formal principle of the Simper text and related issues in each period, then discuss the relationship between the Simper text and the related issues of each period, and then reveal the order of the relationship between the Sembell text and each period. After discussing each kind of form principle separately, the fifth chapter of this article regards the form principle as a whole, discusses the relation between all kinds of form principle, the relation between the demonstration of form principle and archaeological demonstration. The relationship between Samper's text and contemporary achievements. The fifth chapter is a link between the above and the following, and the problems revealed need to be further improved, while the sixth chapter discusses the formal principles of Sembell's text at a higher conceptual level. The most obvious achievement of this paper is to expound the relationship between the architectural thoughts of different periods and different levels of the texts of Samper in different periods, so as to reveal the specific relationship between the continuity and change of the three texts. Draw the development of Semper architectural theory. In addition, the paper has three main conclusions. The first one is that the setting object of the formal principle, the stand of the formal principle and the way of argumentation of the formal principle are closely related to the latter two texts. Moreover, the relationship between weaving and encirclement elements and between ancient Greek culture and non-European culture is related to the proof of color decoration theory. The second: compared with the "characteristics" of contemporary architectural circles, Sembell's architectural theory actually originates from a more positive response to many "commonalities" of other disciplines of the same time. Third, the characteristics of the "advance" in the contemporary architectural thought presented by Samper's architectural theory are partly derived from the strong intention of seeking the historical original appearance, and partly from the return of the traditional architectural discipline definition method. In other words, these characteristics of "leading" actually originated from the personal thought of Samper, which lagged behind the development of the same era. Finally, the thesis goes back to the discussion on the theory of architecture and the relationship between different periods in the study, and their extensive evaluation proves once again the importance of returning the study to the text itself. The full text of the thesis is about 253000 words (in which the text is about 231000 words and the illustrations are 165).
【學位授予單位】：南京大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：TU-86

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周保利;;19世紀英國科學教育與古典教育的論爭及其影響[J];河北師范大學學報(教育科學版);2009年05期

2 馬金鳳;建構(gòu)中的材料運用及藝術(shù)表達——關(guān)于散普爾與賴特[J];華中建筑;2005年05期

3 馮路;表皮的歷史視野[J];建筑師;2004年04期

4 陳志毅;表皮,在解構(gòu)中覺醒[J];建筑師;2004年04期

5 史永高;;森佩爾建筑理論述評　[J];建筑師;2005年06期

6 約瑟夫·里克沃特;包志禹;;森佩爾——一位建筑師及建筑史家[J];建筑師;2006年05期

7 史永高;;白墻的表面屬性和建造內(nèi)涵[J];建筑師;2006年06期

8 史永高;;材料的“本性”與“真實性”——材料問題的觀念性層面初探[J];建筑師;2009年03期

9 埃斯拉·薩赫因;胡欣;;冷與熱,干與濕:彼得·卒姆托作品中“材料的環(huán)圍屬性”[J];建筑師;2009年03期

10 陳強;;當代建筑中的結(jié)構(gòu)性表皮現(xiàn)象[J];建筑學報;2010年04期

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條

1 袁曦臨;人文社會科學學科分類體系研究[D];南京大學;2011年

，

本文編號：1870300