【摘要】：相比于傳統(tǒng)的國(guó)與國(guó)不同產(chǎn)業(yè)之間產(chǎn)品交換的產(chǎn)業(yè)間貿(mào)易模式,近年來產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)貿(mào)易已經(jīng)開始逐漸成為國(guó)際貿(mào)易的主流。中日的鋼鐵產(chǎn)業(yè)無論是在各自國(guó)家還是在國(guó)際鋼鐵市場(chǎng)都具有不可估量的地位,是無可置疑的鋼鐵產(chǎn)業(yè)大國(guó)和貿(mào)易大國(guó),近些年兩國(guó)鋼鐵產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)貿(mào)易的整體水平呈波動(dòng)上升趨勢(shì)。作為我國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)五大耗能產(chǎn)業(yè)之一,鋼鐵產(chǎn)業(yè)近些年也逐漸面臨轉(zhuǎn)型,而產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)貿(mào)易是消化鋼鐵產(chǎn)業(yè)過剩產(chǎn)能的有效手段。因此對(duì)其進(jìn)行相關(guān)研究是有較重要的實(shí)際意義的。影響中日鋼鐵產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)貿(mào)易的因素可以從宏觀層面和微觀層面兩個(gè)角度來考慮,宏觀層面中規(guī)模經(jīng)濟(jì)、產(chǎn)品差異化、外國(guó)直接投資、產(chǎn)品差異化等因素和微觀層面中市場(chǎng)規(guī)模、制度環(huán)境、人均國(guó)民收入差異、貿(mào)易開放度和東亞區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化等因素都會(huì)對(duì)其產(chǎn)生影響。在對(duì)上述因素進(jìn)行進(jìn)一步的實(shí)證分析后,發(fā)現(xiàn)其中技術(shù)水平因素對(duì)中日鋼鐵產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)貿(mào)易水平有著最重要的影響�？梢韵鄳�(yīng)地從宏觀和微觀兩方面入手對(duì)我國(guó)鋼鐵產(chǎn)業(yè)以及相關(guān)企業(yè)進(jìn)行整改,包括調(diào)整產(chǎn)業(yè)布局和產(chǎn)品結(jié)構(gòu)、完善法律法規(guī)、重視環(huán)保節(jié)能、整合鋼鐵產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈、選擇合適的產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展模式,鋼鐵企業(yè)也需要不斷加大技術(shù)研發(fā)的投入力度,深入進(jìn)行技術(shù)創(chuàng)新、學(xué)習(xí)國(guó)外先進(jìn)管理經(jīng)驗(yàn)等,以此加快我國(guó)鋼鐵產(chǎn)業(yè)的轉(zhuǎn)型升級(jí),提升中日兩國(guó)鋼鐵產(chǎn)業(yè)及相關(guān)產(chǎn)業(yè)的產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)貿(mào)易水平,提高我國(guó)鋼鐵產(chǎn)品的國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力。
[Abstract]:Compared with the traditional mode of inter-industry trade between different industries, intra-industry trade has gradually become the mainstream of international trade in recent years. The iron and steel industry of China and Japan has an inestimable position both in their respective countries and in the international steel market. In recent years, the overall level of intra-industry trade between the two countries fluctuated upward. As one of the five major energy-consuming industries in China, the steel industry is also gradually facing the transition in recent years, and intra-industry trade is an effective means to digest the excess capacity of the steel industry. Therefore, it is of great practical significance to study it. The factors that affect the intra-industry trade between China and Japan can be considered from the macro level and the micro level, such as macro-scale economy, product differentiation, foreign direct investment, product differentiation, and market size at the micro level. The institutional environment, the difference of per capita national income, the degree of trade openness and the regional economic integration of East Asia all have an impact on it. After further empirical analysis of the above factors, it is found that the technical level has the most important influence on the level of intra-industry trade between China and Japan. We can correspondingly start from macro and micro aspects to rectify our steel industry and related enterprises, including adjusting the industrial layout and product structure, perfecting laws and regulations, attaching importance to environmental protection and energy saving, and integrating the iron and steel industry chain. In order to speed up the transformation and upgrading of China's iron and steel industry, iron and steel enterprises also need to increase their investment in technology research and development, carry out in-depth technological innovation, and learn from foreign advanced management experience in order to choose a suitable industrial development model. To raise the level of intra-industry trade between China and Japan in iron and steel industry and related industries, and to improve the international competitiveness of China's iron and steel products.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F426.31;F431.3;F752.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蘇春江;;中日農(nóng)產(chǎn)品產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)貿(mào)易實(shí)證研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究參考;2014年38期

2 陳巧慧;戴慶玲;;中國(guó)與日韓服務(wù)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)貿(mào)易水平分析[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問題;2014年05期

3 梁會(huì)君;朱延福;;日本對(duì)華直接投資新趨勢(shì)對(duì)中日產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)貿(mào)易的影響——基于機(jī)電產(chǎn)品的實(shí)證分析[J];亞太經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年04期

4 孫孟;張彬;;中日鋼鐵產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)貿(mào)易及影響因素實(shí)證分析[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2012年01期

5 景曉洋;章家清;;中日鋼鐵產(chǎn)業(yè)出口競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力實(shí)證分析[J];現(xiàn)代商貿(mào)工業(yè);2011年24期

6 李擁軍;李曉東;;對(duì)我國(guó)長(zhǎng)期大批量進(jìn)口日本鋼材的原因分析[J];船舶物資與市場(chǎng);2011年05期

7 韓基早;劉俊;;中國(guó)鋼鐵產(chǎn)業(yè)對(duì)韓國(guó)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的分析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)界(學(xué)術(shù)版);2011年06期

8 劉軍;謝銳;王臘芳;;中國(guó)鋼鐵產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈各環(huán)節(jié)附加值的國(guó)際比較[J];財(cái)經(jīng)理論與實(shí)踐;2011年02期

9 張龍強(qiáng);;提高鋼鐵工業(yè)產(chǎn)品附加值的探討[J];中國(guó)鋼鐵業(yè);2010年01期

10 羅許保;;中日鋼鐵業(yè)核心競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力之比較分析[J];冶金叢刊;2009年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 高偉;中日服務(wù)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)貿(mào)易實(shí)證研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 劉瀚馳;中日電子通訊產(chǎn)品產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)貿(mào)易實(shí)證研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2015年

2 李興杜;中日汽車產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)貿(mào)易的實(shí)證分析[D];遼寧大學(xué);2013年

3 景曉洋;中日鋼鐵產(chǎn)業(yè)國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力比較研究[D];江南大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：2293031