發(fā)布時間：2018-03-31 09:32

  本文選題：多元智能理論　切入點：學習共同體　出處：《上海師范大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：加德納的多元智能理論為一線教師提供了一種多維度地評估學生及其學習過程的理念。學生的個性化和多元化個性特征、學習的才能、學習風格等都在課堂教學的方法和途徑中發(fā)揮了決定性的作用。將多元智能理論應用到教學過程中來,已經(jīng)被證明是學校教學和指導的一種有效途徑。本論文通過文獻資料研究法、問卷調(diào)查法、數(shù)據(jù)分析法和案例法,筆者將多元智能理論運用于一線教學研究中。首先,本論文通過“小學生多元智能測量表(附錄一)”來了解學生的多元智能分布的差異,并在此基礎上對全班學生進行異質(zhì)分組,科學合理得組建了若干個小型學習共同體。這一量表也解決了問題1:如何科學合理地組建學習共同體?其次,筆者嘗試學習共同體的獨立運行。筆者通過學習共同體在課堂內(nèi)和課堂外的具體實施做法或者案例來具體解答問題2:如何保證學習共同體在課內(nèi)和課外都能發(fā)揮作用?如何提高學生在學習共同體中積極主動地完成課前預習、課后復習作業(yè)的積極性?筆者從學生學習的五環(huán)節(jié)——預習、上課、作業(yè)、訂正和評價這些角度出發(fā),詳細地闡述了實驗過程中學習共同體具體的運行過程。最后,筆者通過卡方檢驗對“附錄二”問卷中的十個問題分別做了前測和后測選項人數(shù)對比分析,通過數(shù)據(jù)分析來說明,學習共同體的組建和運行對于提高學生對英語的興趣、提升學生英語綜合學習能力、提高學生完成課前預習和課后復習等口語類為主的作業(yè)的積極性和有效性。這些數(shù)據(jù)的分析很全面地解答了問題3.如何對組建的學習共同體的有效性進行檢測和反饋?筆者通過一個學期的教學實踐發(fā)現(xiàn),多元智能學習共同體在學生英語的綜合素養(yǎng)提升上有諸多積極作用,如:有效地提升學生的聽力理解能力和口語表達能力;潛移默化地擴大學生的詞匯量;有助于拓展學生的寫作思路,豐富寫作的層次和結構;激發(fā)了學生主動完成書面作業(yè)的積極性,將口語作業(yè)的監(jiān)督落實到實處;培養(yǎng)了學生認真聆聽他人見解的能力,養(yǎng)成尊重他人的良好品質(zhì);學生更愿意在共同體中探討解決自己的疑難雜癥,而不是先咨詢父母或者教師;學生對于英語的興趣都大幅度提高,因而在英語的學業(yè)成績檢測中也表現(xiàn)出了較大的進步。
[Abstract]:Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences provides first-line teachers with a multi-dimensional assessment of students and their learning processes. Learning style plays a decisive role in the methods and approaches of classroom teaching. The theory of multiple intelligences is applied to the teaching process. It has been proved to be an effective way of teaching and guidance in schools. This paper applies the theory of multiple intelligences to first-line teaching research through literature research, questionnaire survey, data analysis and case law. In this paper, we use the Primary School students' multiple intelligences scale (Appendix I) to find out the differences in the distribution of multiple intelligences, and on the basis of this, we divide the students into heterogeneous groups. Scientific and reasonable construction of a number of small learning communities. This scale also solved the problem 1: how to set up a scientific and reasonable learning community? Secondly, the author tries to learn the independent operation of the community. The author answers question 2 by learning the concrete implementation practices or cases of the community in and out of the classroom: how to ensure that the learning community can play a role both in and out of class? How to improve the enthusiasm of students in the learning community to take the initiative to complete pre-class preparation and review homework after class? From the point of view of the five links of students' study-preview, class, homework, revision and evaluation, the author expounds in detail the specific operation process of the learning community in the course of the experiment. Through chi-square test, the author makes a comparative analysis of the number of pre-test and post-test options for the ten questions in Appendix II questionnaire. Through the data analysis, the author explains that the formation and operation of learning community can improve the students' interest in English. To improve students' comprehensive English learning ability, To improve students' enthusiasm and effectiveness in completing oral homework such as pre-class preparation and after-class review. The analysis of these data fully answers question 3.How to test and feedback the validity of the learning community? Through a semester's teaching practice, the author finds that multiple intelligences learning community has many positive effects on the improvement of students' comprehensive English literacy, such as: effectively improving students' listening comprehension and oral expression ability; Expanding students' vocabulary imperceptibly, helping to expand students' writing ideas, enriching writing levels and structures, arousing students' initiative to complete written homework and putting the supervision of oral English work into practice; Cultivate students' ability to listen carefully to others' opinions and develop good qualities of respecting others; students are more willing to explore and solve their own problems in the community rather than consulting their parents or teachers first. Students' interest in English has been greatly improved, so they have made great progress in the examination of English academic achievements.
【學位授予單位】：上海師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G623.31

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 程亮;;學校即共同體——重返杜威的《民主主義與教育》[J];湖南師范大學教育科學學報;2016年03期

2 趙瑜;;基于學習共同體的大學英語小組教學的實踐探索[J];校園英語;2014年25期

3 趙婷;;落實小組教學,提高復習效率[J];中國科教創(chuàng)新導刊;2014年06期

4 王麗娜;;基于多元智能理論的初中英語教學策略——以牛津初中英語教學為例[J];西藏教育;2011年02期

5 孫波;;在學習中求發(fā)展——黑龍江省哈爾濱市南崗區(qū)教育局創(chuàng)建“學習共同體”的思考[J];人民教育;2010年08期

6 姚春杰;;構建以“合作、傾聽、自主”為中心的課堂——基于佐藤學《靜悄悄的革命》一書的思考[J];福建論壇(社科教育版);2009年05期

7 郝玫;付紅霞;;多元智能、學習風格、學習策略與英語成績的相關研究[J];外國語言文學;2006年04期

8 杜秋菊;;構建“學習共同體”初探[J];中國科技信息;2005年21期

9 霍力巖,趙清梅;多元智力理論的評價觀及其對學生發(fā)展評價的啟示[J];比較教育研究;2005年04期

10 文秋芳,王立非;中國英語學習策略實證研究20年[J];外國語言文學;2004年01期

相關碩士學位論文 前4條

1 高銳;初中生多元智能，學習策略及英語成績的相關性研究[D];青海師范大學;2015年

2 曾慧;小學英語課堂以優(yōu)勢智能為背景的教學研究[D];湖南師范大學;2012年

3 李偉芳;多元智能理論與小學學困生單詞記憶效果的個案研究[D];首都師范大學;2012年

4 朱莉;多元智能評價方法研究[D];東北師范大學;2005年

，

本文編號：1690149