發(fā)布時(shí)間：2017-12-31 02:47

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：我國(guó)新股發(fā)行制度變遷下的抑價(jià)研究　出處：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 新股發(fā)行制度變遷 新股抑價(jià)發(fā)行準(zhǔn)入 發(fā)行方式 發(fā)行定價(jià)

【摘要】：僅20年時(shí)間,我國(guó)股票市場(chǎng)就走過(guò)成熟股票市場(chǎng)上百年的發(fā)展旅程,并取令人矚目的成績(jī)。截至2011年底,上交所成為世界第四大證券交易所、亞洲第二大證券交易所,深交所成為涵蓋主板、中小板和創(chuàng)業(yè)板的多層次的資本市場(chǎng)平臺(tái)。創(chuàng)立至今二十年,我國(guó)股票市場(chǎng)正逐步從相對(duì)單一、封閉的小規(guī)模市場(chǎng)轉(zhuǎn)向多層次、開(kāi)放的金融平臺(tái),在國(guó)際上的影響力也不斷增強(qiáng),并已成為全球重要的資本市場(chǎng)之一,為我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)持續(xù)發(fā)展發(fā)揮了巨大的作用。然而我國(guó)股票市場(chǎng)也存在諸多弊病,新股發(fā)行抑價(jià)情況嚴(yán)重(首日收益率過(guò)高)即是其中之一。過(guò)高的新股發(fā)行抑價(jià)率說(shuō)明一級(jí)市場(chǎng)與二級(jí)市場(chǎng)股票價(jià)格差異巨大,容易讓中小投資者對(duì)新股中簽形成過(guò)高心理預(yù)期,吸引大量資金常年集中“打新股”,導(dǎo)致資金在一級(jí)市場(chǎng)和二級(jí)市場(chǎng)之間無(wú)序流動(dòng),不利于股市健康發(fā)展。 過(guò)去二十年是我國(guó)股票市場(chǎng)摸索的二十年,也是不斷解決困擾股市發(fā)展各種問(wèn)題的二十年。市場(chǎng)參與主體最為關(guān)心的新股發(fā)行體制改革歷經(jīng)多輪調(diào)整,從審批制到核準(zhǔn)制,從各形式的網(wǎng)下發(fā)行到網(wǎng)上發(fā)行,從固定價(jià)格到詢價(jià)發(fā)行,那么這些制度推出對(duì)新股發(fā)行抑價(jià)問(wèn)題有何影響,作為新股發(fā)行制度主要組成部分的發(fā)行準(zhǔn)入、發(fā)行方式和發(fā)行定價(jià)制度對(duì)新股抑價(jià)現(xiàn)象又有什么影響,今后的政策應(yīng)當(dāng)注重哪些方面的改變?本文通過(guò)對(duì)新股發(fā)行制度變遷下的抑價(jià)問(wèn)題研究,嘗試回答上述問(wèn)題。 本文在前人研究的基礎(chǔ)上,探討新股發(fā)行制度對(duì)新股發(fā)行抑價(jià)現(xiàn)象是否存在影響,以及影響程度如何。本文著眼十研究新股發(fā)行制度三個(gè)具體方面——發(fā)行準(zhǔn)入、發(fā)行方式和發(fā)行定價(jià)——對(duì)新股發(fā)行抑價(jià)的影響。參照以往學(xué)者對(duì)新股發(fā)行制度變遷階段的劃分,考慮新股發(fā)行制度在樣本期間的法規(guī)和實(shí)際操作的變化,本章把樣本期間劃分為若干階段。在分析每一方面對(duì)抑價(jià)的影響時(shí),將原來(lái)的樣本根據(jù)此方面制度變遷階段劃分為對(duì)應(yīng)的子樣本,對(duì)子樣本進(jìn)行描述性統(tǒng)計(jì)分析,然后運(yùn)用單過(guò)程ANOVA分析檢驗(yàn)具體發(fā)行制度方面的變遷對(duì)新股抑價(jià)產(chǎn)生何種影響。借鑒前人對(duì)新股發(fā)行抑價(jià)研究中常用的研究方法,本文采用虛擬變量區(qū)分不同階段,同時(shí)引入新股發(fā)行價(jià)、募集資本等控制變量檢驗(yàn)新股發(fā)行制度對(duì)抑價(jià)的作用。 我國(guó)股票作為新興市場(chǎng),已經(jīng)經(jīng)歷了若干監(jiān)管變化。新股發(fā)行制度已經(jīng)走過(guò)幾個(gè)發(fā)展階段,從一開(kāi)始對(duì)新股供應(yīng)量、定價(jià)等方面的嚴(yán)格控制,逐步走向以市場(chǎng)為導(dǎo)向、市場(chǎng)決定發(fā)行的方向。隨著新股發(fā)行制度不斷變遷,我國(guó)新股發(fā)行抑價(jià)情況逐步減輕。 我國(guó)新股發(fā)行制度主要包括發(fā)行準(zhǔn)入、發(fā)行方式和發(fā)行定價(jià)三大方面,新股發(fā)行制度變遷亦即這三方面的變遷。發(fā)行準(zhǔn)入制度從審批制的額度管理轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)橹笜?biāo)管理,抑價(jià)情況沒(méi)有好轉(zhuǎn)；之后發(fā)行準(zhǔn)入制度沿著市場(chǎng)化的方向變革,抑價(jià)因此不斷降低。新股發(fā)行方式的變革中,向二級(jí)市場(chǎng)配售是一次政策的倒退,新股發(fā)行抑價(jià)沒(méi)有在這一政策影響下明顯緩解,但總體看來(lái)發(fā)行方式的不斷改革減少了新股發(fā)行抑價(jià)程度。從抑價(jià)問(wèn)題的角度看,新股定價(jià)制度的變革在詢價(jià)制度之前都沒(méi)有明顯成效,詢價(jià)制度的建立對(duì)于緩解新股發(fā)行抑價(jià)起到明顯作用。
[Abstract]:In just 20 years, China's stock market will mature stock market through hundreds of years of development journey, and remarkable achievements. By the end of 2011, to become the world's fourth largest stock exchange, Asia's second largest stock exchange, the Shenzhen Stock Exchange became the cover board, small board and gem multi-level capital market platform. Founded in twenty years, China's stock market is gradually from relatively single, closed small market to a multi-level, open financial platform, international influence is also growing, and has become one of the world's major capital market, plays an important role for the sustainable development of China's economy. However, I China's stock market also has many disadvantages, IPO underpricing is serious (high rate of return on the first day) is one of them. The high IPO underpricing rate shows a market with two market share price The difference is huge. It is easy for small and medium-sized investors to form excessive psychological expectations for new stocks, attracting large amounts of capital and concentrating on new shares all the year round, resulting in a disorderly flow of funds between the primary and the two tier markets, which is not conducive to the healthy development of the stock market.
In the past twenty years, China's stock market is constantly groping for twenty years, to solve all kinds of problems plagued the development of the stock market for twenty years. Market participants are most concerned about the IPO reform after several rounds of adjustment, from the examination and approval system to the approval system, from the form of the net issuance to the online issuance, issuance from the fixed price to the launch of the system inquiry, the impact on the IPO underpricing, as the IPO system mainly composed of the issuance of access part of the issuing and pricing system and what is the impact on the IPO underpricing phenomenon, the future policy should focus on what to change? Based on the price of restraining the issuing system the attempt to answer the above questions.
In this paper, on the basis of previous studies, to explore the system of issuing new shares for the IPO underpricing phenomenon exists, and how the degree of influence. This paper focuses on the research of the system of issuing new shares ten three specific aspects: the issuance of access, distribution and pricing -- impact on IPO Underpricing. With reference to the previous scholars on the issuing system the division stage, considering the changes of IPO system in the sample period regulations and the actual operation, this chapter of the sample period is divided into several stages. In the analysis of every aspect of the underpricing, the original sample according to the division of the system change stage to the corresponding sub sample, sub sample descriptive statistics the analysis, and then use ANOVA to test the change process of single specific distribution system in terms of the impact on the IPO underpricing. Previous research on IPO Underpricing In this paper, the commonly used research methods, in which virtual variables are used to distinguish different stages, are introduced to control the effect of IPO on underpricing.
China's stock as an emerging market, has experienced a number of regulatory changes. The IPO system has gone through several stages of development, from the beginning of the supply of new shares, pricing and other aspects of strict control, gradually moving towards market-oriented, the market decided to issue directions. With the changes of new stock issuance system, China's IPO the price gradually reduced.
China's IPO system mainly includes the issue of access, distribution and pricing of the issue in three aspects, i.e. change the issuing system of the three aspects. The issuance of access system from the quota management approval system into index management, underpricing is not improved; after the issuance of access system change along the direction of the market, so the underpricing continue to reduce. IPO reform, to two level market placement is a policy setback, IPO underpricing in the impact of this policy without apparent ease, but overall the issue continues to reform to reduce the IPO underpricing. From underpricing perspective, IPO pricing system the change has not obvious effect on the inquiry system before the establishment of the inquiry system for the mitigation of IPO underpricing has played a significant role.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：F832.51

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 柯湘;;股票公開(kāi)發(fā)行的監(jiān)管合約選擇——交易費(fèi)用視角下中國(guó)股票公開(kāi)發(fā)行審核制度的變遷[J];公共管理學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

2 周孝華;趙煒科;劉星;;我國(guó)股票發(fā)行審批制與核準(zhǔn)制下IPO定價(jià)效率的比較研究[J];管理世界;2006年11期

3 范小勇,梁，

本文編號(hào)：1357775