發(fā)布時間：2018-04-20 21:42

  本文選題：產(chǎn)融結(jié)合 + 寶鋼集團��； 參考：《青島大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：當前我國正處在經(jīng)濟轉(zhuǎn)軌的特殊歷史時期,隨著我國供給側(cè)改革不停升溫,傳統(tǒng)產(chǎn)業(yè)和金融行業(yè)都面臨轉(zhuǎn)型升級的壓力,企業(yè)集團紛紛選擇產(chǎn)融結(jié)合作為提升集團運作效率和企業(yè)集團競爭力的重要手段。盡管產(chǎn)融結(jié)合成為企業(yè)集團實現(xiàn)跨越式發(fā)展的普遍選擇,但其本身也是一把雙刃劍,在實現(xiàn)資源的優(yōu)勢互補,帶來降低交易成本,緩解融資約束等諸多利好的同時也加大了企業(yè)集團的經(jīng)營風險和財務風險,這使得關(guān)注企業(yè)集團產(chǎn)融戰(zhàn)略實施機制以及其對微觀經(jīng)濟個體的影響這一問題更為關(guān)鍵和必要。寶鋼集團作為我國產(chǎn)融結(jié)合的先驅(qū)者,其產(chǎn)融結(jié)合歷程值得深入分析和研究。本文參考整理前人研究文獻,運用歸納分析法、案例分析法以及實證研究法對寶鋼集團產(chǎn)融結(jié)合歷程及其效應展開研究,立足于我國產(chǎn)融結(jié)合當前狀況,歸納總結(jié)出發(fā)展型、投資型、服務型三種產(chǎn)融型企業(yè)集團發(fā)展模式,并分模式分析其影響企業(yè)集團財務活動的作用機理,結(jié)合寶鋼集團案例,劃分出三個產(chǎn)融結(jié)合歷程,之后對不同階段寶鋼集團產(chǎn)融結(jié)合進行歷程分析、環(huán)境分析以及機制分析,比較不同階段下產(chǎn)融結(jié)合對寶鋼集團財務活動的影響,并基于DEA模型評價寶鋼集團產(chǎn)融結(jié)合效率。本文基于寶鋼集團產(chǎn)融結(jié)合案例的剖析總結(jié)成功經(jīng)驗,發(fā)現(xiàn)歸納寶鋼集團產(chǎn)融結(jié)合存在產(chǎn)融結(jié)合模式選擇具有階段適應性,產(chǎn)融結(jié)合發(fā)展與商業(yè)模式創(chuàng)新相適應,產(chǎn)融結(jié)合與公司治理相配合的特點,并針對如何提高寶鋼集團產(chǎn)融結(jié)合效率的問題從外部環(huán)境、集團層面兩個角度提出建議,以期為我國產(chǎn)融結(jié)合研究提供參考。
[Abstract]:At present, our country is in a special historical period of economic transition. With the continuous heating up of supply-side reforms in our country, both traditional industries and financial industries are facing the pressure of transformation and upgrading. Enterprise groups choose the combination of production and finance as an important means to improve the efficiency of operation and competitiveness of enterprise groups. Although the combination of production and finance has become a common choice for enterprise groups to achieve leap-forward development, it is also a double-edged sword, which has brought about a reduction in transaction costs by complementing the advantages of resources. At the same time, it also increases the management risk and financial risk of the enterprise group, which makes it more important and necessary to pay attention to the implementation mechanism of the enterprise group industry and finance strategy and its influence on the microeconomic individual. Baosteel Group, as the forerunner of our domestic financial combination, deserves further analysis and research. Based on the current situation of China's domestic financial integration, this paper studies the process and effect of industrial and financial integration of Baosteel Group by using inductive analysis, case analysis and empirical research, based on the current situation of domestic combination of finance and industry, and summarizes the developmental type, which is based on the current situation of China's domestic combination of finance and industry. Three development modes of investment and service enterprise groups are analyzed, and the mechanism of their influence on the financial activities of enterprise groups is analyzed. In combination with the case of Baosteel Group, the three processes of combination of production and finance are divided. After that, the paper analyzes the history, environment and mechanism of the combination of production and finance in different stages of Baosteel Group, compares the influence of the combination of production and finance on the financial activities of Baosteel Group in different stages, and evaluates the efficiency of the combination of production and Finance of Baosteel Group based on DEA model. Based on the analysis and summary of the successful experience of Baosteel Group, this paper finds that the combination of production and finance has the stage adaptability, and the development of the combination of industry and finance is suitable for the innovation of business model. The characteristics of the combination of industry and finance and corporate governance, and how to improve the efficiency of the combination of production and finance of Baosteel Group from the external environment, group level two points of view, in order to provide a reference for our domestic financial combination research.
【學位授予單位】：青島大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F406.7;F426.31

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 韓丹;王磊;;產(chǎn)融結(jié)合、股權(quán)集中度與公司投資效率——基于上市公司參股銀行的面板數(shù)據(jù)分析[J];企業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2016年11期

2 易蘭廣;;基于Malmquist指數(shù)的中國企業(yè)集團產(chǎn)融結(jié)合效率評價[J];云南財經(jīng)大學學報;2016年04期

3 王超恩;張瑞君;謝露;;產(chǎn)融結(jié)合、金融發(fā)展與企業(yè)創(chuàng)新——來自制造業(yè)上市公司持股金融機構(gòu)的經(jīng)驗證據(jù)[J];研究與發(fā)展管理;2016年05期

4 譚小芳;范靜;;產(chǎn)融結(jié)合對農(nóng)業(yè)上市公司融資能力的影響研究?[J];農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟問題;2016年06期

5 楊姝琴;張沛康;侯杰宇;;基于SFA的制造業(yè)產(chǎn)融結(jié)合效率及影響因素的實證研究[J];探求;2016年02期

6 蘇妍;;產(chǎn)融結(jié)合對企業(yè)集團融資的影響[J];知識經(jīng)濟;2016年01期

7 鄭立東;程小可;;經(jīng)濟環(huán)境波動、產(chǎn)融結(jié)合與企業(yè)投融資——以A民營企業(yè)為例[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟評論;2015年03期

8 萬良勇;廖明情;胡t，

本文編號：1779575