網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗罪的司法適用問題研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-06-29 19:25
【摘要】：《關(guān)于辦理利用信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)實施誹謗等刑事案件適用法律若干問題的解釋》的發(fā)布將網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間納入到刑法的空間效力范圍之內(nèi)，網(wǎng)絡(luò)秩序也成為受刑法規(guī)制的社會公共秩序的重要組成部分。這本司法解釋明確了網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗行為入罪與刑罰的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，解決了司法機關(guān)辦理相關(guān)刑事案件無統(tǒng)一標(biāo)準(zhǔn)可依的問題。 雖然這份具有特別時代意義法律文本補充了法律中的空缺，，解決了司法實踐中難以確定的網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗案件問題，但是新法律的出臺是否給司法實踐帶來了新的挑戰(zhàn)：新的司法解釋是否真的能解決之前法律缺失而產(chǎn)生的問題？是否還有無法解決的新的司法實務(wù)問題隨即出現(xiàn)？本文在以上問題的思路基礎(chǔ)上，對網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗的司法認(rèn)定問題進行研究解析。 本文共分為三個部分: 第一章是關(guān)于網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗的概述。首先闡述了本罪概念和犯罪構(gòu)成要件，并結(jié)合國內(nèi)外立法，對國際上網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗的去刑事化與國內(nèi)的刑事入罪的趨勢比較分析。 第二章從總體上把握本罪的犯罪構(gòu)成基礎(chǔ)上，闡述了各個犯罪要件的司法認(rèn)定，如本罪犯罪主體的多元性，犯罪對象，即名譽權(quán)主體的進一步思考;本罪客觀方面的依據(jù)數(shù)量來定罪是否妥當(dāng)?shù)膯栴}，針對捏造、散布等行為的認(rèn)定和取證問題;本罪的主體誹謗言論的制造者、散布者、轉(zhuǎn)發(fā)者以及提供網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)的運營商的責(zé)任分析認(rèn)定;在主觀方面，本罪由直接故意和間接故意構(gòu)成的合理性分析。 第三章在明確了對網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗罪的司法認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)之后，進一步對網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗罪的嚴(yán)格司法適用問題做出分析。筆者從現(xiàn)實存在的對青少年、對記者適用網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗罪的嚴(yán)格控制問題，司法機關(guān)主動介入網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗犯罪的嚴(yán)格控制問題以及對網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐問題的辯證司法問題提出幾點嚴(yán)格司法的意見或建議。
[Abstract]:The publication of the interpretation of some applicable laws in criminal cases, such as handling the use of information network to carry out libel, brings cyberspace into the scope of the spatial effect of criminal law, and the network order has also become an important part of the social public order regulated by criminal law. This judicial interpretation clarifies the standards for the incrimination and punishment of network libel, and solves the problem that there is no unified standard for judicial organs to handle relevant criminal cases. Although this legal text of special significance complements the vacancy in the law and solves the problem of network libel cases which is difficult to be determined in judicial practice, does the introduction of the new law bring new challenges to the judicial practice: can the new judicial interpretation really solve the problems arising from the lack of the previous law? Are there any new judicial practice problems that cannot be solved immediately? On the basis of the above problems, this paper studies and analyzes the judicial identification of network slander. This paper is divided into three parts: the first chapter is an overview of network slander. First of all, the concept of this crime and the constituent elements of the crime are expounded, and combined with domestic and foreign legislation, the decriminalization of network slander in the international community and the trend of criminal incrimination in China are compared and analyzed. The second chapter, on the basis of grasping the constitution of the crime as a whole, expounds the judicial identification of each crime element, such as the pluralism of the subject of the crime, the object of the crime, that is, the further thinking of the subject of the right of reputation, the question of whether the conviction is appropriate on the basis of the quantity of the objective aspect of the crime, and the identification and evidence collection of the act of fabricating, spreading and so on. The main body of the crime slander speech maker, distributor, distributor and network service providers of the responsibility analysis; in the subjective aspect, the crime is composed of direct intent and indirect intent of the rationality analysis. The third chapter, after defining the judicial identification standard of network libel crime, further analyzes the strict judicial application of network libel crime. The author puts forward some strict judicial opinions or suggestions on the dialectical judicial problems of network anti-corruption from the strict control of network libel to teenagers and journalists, the strict control of network libel crime by judicial organs, and the dialectical judicial problems of network anti-corruption.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：新疆大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3
本文編號：2508048
[Abstract]:The publication of the interpretation of some applicable laws in criminal cases, such as handling the use of information network to carry out libel, brings cyberspace into the scope of the spatial effect of criminal law, and the network order has also become an important part of the social public order regulated by criminal law. This judicial interpretation clarifies the standards for the incrimination and punishment of network libel, and solves the problem that there is no unified standard for judicial organs to handle relevant criminal cases. Although this legal text of special significance complements the vacancy in the law and solves the problem of network libel cases which is difficult to be determined in judicial practice, does the introduction of the new law bring new challenges to the judicial practice: can the new judicial interpretation really solve the problems arising from the lack of the previous law? Are there any new judicial practice problems that cannot be solved immediately? On the basis of the above problems, this paper studies and analyzes the judicial identification of network slander. This paper is divided into three parts: the first chapter is an overview of network slander. First of all, the concept of this crime and the constituent elements of the crime are expounded, and combined with domestic and foreign legislation, the decriminalization of network slander in the international community and the trend of criminal incrimination in China are compared and analyzed. The second chapter, on the basis of grasping the constitution of the crime as a whole, expounds the judicial identification of each crime element, such as the pluralism of the subject of the crime, the object of the crime, that is, the further thinking of the subject of the right of reputation, the question of whether the conviction is appropriate on the basis of the quantity of the objective aspect of the crime, and the identification and evidence collection of the act of fabricating, spreading and so on. The main body of the crime slander speech maker, distributor, distributor and network service providers of the responsibility analysis; in the subjective aspect, the crime is composed of direct intent and indirect intent of the rationality analysis. The third chapter, after defining the judicial identification standard of network libel crime, further analyzes the strict judicial application of network libel crime. The author puts forward some strict judicial opinions or suggestions on the dialectical judicial problems of network anti-corruption from the strict control of network libel to teenagers and journalists, the strict control of network libel crime by judicial organs, and the dialectical judicial problems of network anti-corruption.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：新疆大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條
1 肖永平,徐鵬;網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗國際管轄權(quán)問題初探[J];法商研究;2003年03期
2 付世利;;《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》第三十六條淺析[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(中旬刊);2010年06期
3 許梅珍;羅燕圓;;解讀《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》對網(wǎng)絡(luò)隱私權(quán)的保護[J];法制與社會;2010年20期
4 杜曦明;;利用信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)實施的誹謗犯罪實務(wù)問題研究[J];法律適用;2013年11期
5 劉椺;;淺論微博侵權(quán)中的法律適用——以《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》第36條為視角[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(中旬);2012年01期
6 張志超;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗的構(gòu)成及認(rèn)定中的疑難問題[J];中國檢察官;2008年08期
7 楊樹;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)環(huán)境下網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)責(zé)任的法律思考[J];中國市場;2010年18期
本文編號：2508048
本文鏈接：http://lk138.cn/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2508048.html
