本文選題：限制自由刑 + 管制　； 參考：《重慶大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：限制自由刑不同于身體刑、生命刑，也不同于同屬于自由刑的剝奪自由刑，受刑人仍然在社會(huì)上過著基本正常的日常生活，繼續(xù)從事原來的職業(yè)，保持正常的社會(huì)家庭關(guān)系，當(dāng)然他們會(huì)受到法律的特殊限制，喪失某些社會(huì)待遇。目前，在世界上很多國(guó)家的刑事立法中都有限制自由刑的規(guī)定，只是名稱存在差異。英美稱為保護(hù)與觀察、社會(huì)服務(wù)令，一些原蘇聯(lián)和東歐國(guó)家的刑法則將其規(guī)定為不剝奪自由的勞動(dòng)改造。從刑罰的思想基礎(chǔ)來看，限制自由刑與刑罰輕緩化、社會(huì)化的趨勢(shì)密不可分的，它在理論上拋棄了對(duì)罪犯進(jìn)行懲罰、報(bào)復(fù)的觀念，而認(rèn)為刑罰的最主要目的在于阻止犯罪、預(yù)防犯罪和消滅犯罪。鑒于此社會(huì)應(yīng)當(dāng)對(duì)罪犯進(jìn)行教育、挽救，使其改邪歸正、重返社會(huì)。自此，限制自由刑應(yīng)運(yùn)而生。 為我國(guó)所獨(dú)創(chuàng)且作為我國(guó)唯一限制自由刑的管制刑，并不完全剝奪犯罪分子的自由而是將符合條件的服刑人員放在社會(huì)中進(jìn)行教育和改造。管制設(shè)立之初對(duì)于打擊反革命分子及取得解放戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)和鞏固新生政權(quán)起到了重要的作用。但是近代中國(guó)尤其是改革開放以來，社會(huì)形勢(shì)發(fā)展迅速，，管制刑暴露出來的問題與我國(guó)法治建設(shè)的要求顯得格格不入。正因?yàn)槿绱�，學(xué)界才會(huì)有要廢除管制刑的聲音，但是管制刑作為一種限制自由刑有其獨(dú)特的功能和意義，保留并完善管制刑是最正確的選擇。 本文將從管制的發(fā)展歷程、含義、特點(diǎn)、功能、價(jià)值及現(xiàn)今司法實(shí)踐中存在的問題等方面展開論述，提出完善我國(guó)管制刑的建議，從而使其更好地發(fā)揮自身的效用。
[Abstract]:Restriction of liberty punishment is different from body punishment, life penalty, and deprivation of liberty punishment, which belongs to the same kind of free punishment. Prisoners still lead a basic normal daily life in society, continue to engage in their original professions, and maintain normal social and family relations. Of course, they will be subject to the special restrictions of the law, the loss of certain social treatment. At present, the criminal legislation of many countries in the world has the stipulation of limited free punishment, but the name is different. Britain and the United States called protection and observation, social service orders, some former Soviet and Eastern European countries' criminal law stipulated it as free labor reform. From the view of the ideological basis of penalty, the restriction of free punishment is closely related to the punishment of light and socialized. It abandons the concept of punishment and revenge of criminals in theory, and thinks that the main purpose of punishment is to prevent crime. Crime prevention and elimination In view of this society, criminals should be educated, saved, corrected and reintegrated into society. Since then, the restriction of liberty came into being. As the only restriction of freedom punishment, the control penalty, which was created by our country, does not completely deprive the criminals of their freedom, but puts the qualified prisoners in the society for education and reform. At the beginning of its establishment, it played an important role in fighting the anti-revolutionaries, obtaining the war of liberation and consolidating the new regime. However, in modern China, especially since the reform and opening up, the social situation has developed rapidly, and the problems exposed by the punishment of control are incompatible with the requirements of the construction of the rule of law in our country. Because of this, the academic circles will have the voice to abolish the punishment of control, but as a kind of restriction of freedom punishment has its unique function and significance, it is the most correct choice to retain and perfect the punishment of control. This article will discuss the development course, meaning, characteristic, function, value and problems existing in the current judicial practice of the regulation, and put forward the suggestion of perfecting the control punishment in our country, so as to make it exert its own utility better.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.12

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 李峰;;重構(gòu)管制刑之思考[J];廣西社會(huì)主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

2 翟中東;刑罰執(zhí)行社會(huì)化的國(guó)際現(xiàn)狀與我國(guó)的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年05期

3 王剛;現(xiàn)代社區(qū)服務(wù)刑罰的價(jià)值及其借鑒[J];攀登;2003年05期

4 林蔚文;;從英國(guó)社區(qū)服務(wù)刑思考我國(guó)刑罰制度現(xiàn)代化路徑[J];廈門特區(qū)黨校學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期

5 曹子丹;;試論我國(guó)管制刑存在的根據(jù)[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);1990年01期

6 王剛;從國(guó)外社區(qū)服務(wù)看我國(guó)管制刑的改革[J];杭州商學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

本文編號(hào)：2041395