發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-18 14:06

  本文選題：敲詐勒索 + 司法認(rèn)定��； 參考：《湖南大學(xué)》2008年碩士論文

【摘要】： 本文首先對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外有關(guān)敲詐勒索罪的立法予以了評(píng)析,在此基礎(chǔ)上得出結(jié)論:我國(guó)刑法規(guī)范中敲詐勒索罪的犯罪構(gòu)成有其獨(dú)特之處。由于犯罪方法的多樣性,本罪的犯罪客體為復(fù)雜客體,而且從解釋論的角度來(lái)看,本罪的犯罪對(duì)象不包括“財(cái)產(chǎn)性利益”。在客觀方面,本罪中的威脅行為可以包括暴力行為,但是使用暴力或暴力威脅手段與占有財(cái)物的行為應(yīng)當(dāng)在不同時(shí)空完成,而威脅或要挾手段強(qiáng)度的衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)宜采用主觀說(shuō)。本罪的主觀方面一般為直接故意,表現(xiàn)為明知以威脅或要挾的手段強(qiáng)索數(shù)額較大的公私財(cái)物或財(cái)產(chǎn)性利益的行為會(huì)引起他人喪失數(shù)額較大的財(cái)物或財(cái)產(chǎn)性利益及人身權(quán)利或其他權(quán)益受損的危害結(jié)果,但決意實(shí)施這一行為并希望非法占有數(shù)額較大的公私財(cái)物或非法取得財(cái)產(chǎn)性利益。本罪在主觀方面還要求行為人具有非法占有或非法索取公私財(cái)物為目的。只有行為人使用了恐嚇、威脅等手段使被害人產(chǎn)生恐懼,被迫交出財(cái)物,才構(gòu)成本罪的既遂。是否具有非法占有的目的是區(qū)分行使權(quán)利行為與敲詐勒索行為的關(guān)鍵所在。敲詐勒索罪與綁架罪、搶劫罪、詐騙罪、盜竊罪以及強(qiáng)迫交易罪,具有一定的聯(lián)系,但在侵犯客體、犯罪方法、暴力或威脅的大小程度以及緊迫程度、主觀狀態(tài)等方面又存在一定的差異。 而從立法論的角度來(lái)看,我國(guó)應(yīng)采用敘明罪狀的方式對(duì)敲詐勒索罪的犯罪構(gòu)成進(jìn)行詳細(xì)地描述,將財(cái)產(chǎn)性利益明確地規(guī)定為敲詐勒索罪的犯罪對(duì)象,采用“情況列舉”加“兜底條款”的方式來(lái)細(xì)化關(guān)于“情節(jié)嚴(yán)重”的規(guī)定。而且在法定刑方面,應(yīng)對(duì)本罪增設(shè)罰金刑,以增加對(duì)犯罪份子的震懾力,與國(guó)際接軌。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the domestic and foreign legislation on the crime of extortion is analyzed, and the conclusion is drawn: the constitution of the crime of extortion in the criminal law of our country has its own characteristics. Because of the diversity of crime methods, the object of crime is complex object, and from the angle of explanation, the object of crime does not include "property interest". Objectively, the threatening behavior in this crime may include violence, but the use of violence or threat of violence and possession of property should be completed in different time and space, and subjective theory should be used to measure the intensity of threat or threat. The subjective aspect of this crime is generally direct and intentional, Expressing itself in the knowledge that the act of imposing a larger amount of public or private property or property interests by means of threats or threats may result in the loss of a larger amount of property or property interests and damage to personal or other rights and interests, But it is determined to carry out this act and wants to illegally possess large amount of public and private property or illegally obtain property benefits. This crime also requires the perpetrator to have the purpose of illegally possessing or illegally soliciting public and private property. Only the perpetrator used intimidation, threats and other means to make the victim fear, forced to hand over property, constitute the completion of the crime. The purpose of illegal possession is to distinguish the exercise of rights from extortion. Extortion is related to kidnapping, robbery, fraud, theft and forced trading, but in terms of object infringement, method of crime, magnitude and urgency of violence or threat, Subjective state and other aspects of the existence of certain differences. From the point of view of legislation theory, our country should describe the crime constitution of the crime of extortion in detail, and define the property interest as the object of the crime of extortion. The use of "enumeration" plus "bottom clause" to refine the "serious circumstances" provisions. Moreover, in the aspect of legal punishment, we should increase the fine penalty to increase the deterrent power to the criminals and connect with the international standards.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 黃恒;拾得他人財(cái)物索要高額報(bào)酬行為性質(zhì)研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

2 熊麗;李某等12人職權(quán)行為定性分析[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

3 吳景仲;論行使權(quán)利與敲詐勒索罪的界限[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2010年

4 甄曉凱;尋釁滋事罪探究[D];河北師范大學(xué);2012年

5 鄭麗麗;敲詐勒索罪研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2012年

6 閆永正;敲詐勒索罪的司法認(rèn)定[D];中央民族大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2035738