發(fā)布時間：2018-06-17 12:38

  本文選題：搶劫罪 + 暴力行為��； 參考：《中國政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：搶劫罪是司法實踐中比較多發(fā)的犯罪,歷來是我國司法機(jī)關(guān)打擊的重點。但在司法實務(wù)中,由于有關(guān)司法實務(wù)部門在對搶劫罪的構(gòu)成特征及司法認(rèn)定方面存在不同認(rèn)識,因而產(chǎn)生不少爭議,這不利于準(zhǔn)確認(rèn)定和懲處搶劫犯罪,本文根據(jù)有關(guān)的刑法理論,并結(jié)合筆者的刑事司法實踐,結(jié)合大量筆者辦理過的真實案例,對實踐中認(rèn)定搶劫罪常見的問題進(jìn)行探討。 本文正文分為三部分 第一部分:筆者對搶劫罪的概念和構(gòu)成特征進(jìn)行了剖析,在該部分,通過實踐中與涉及搶劫罪概念和構(gòu)成特征認(rèn)定的案例,以期對搶劫罪的概念和構(gòu)成特征作出清晰的界定。 第二部分:筆者結(jié)合具體的案例,對搶劫罪認(rèn)定中的常見疑難問題進(jìn)行探討。主要從轉(zhuǎn)化型搶劫罪的認(rèn)定、搶劫罪情節(jié)加重犯和結(jié)果加重犯的認(rèn)定、搶劫罪的停止形態(tài)問題等方面進(jìn)行闡述。第一,關(guān)于轉(zhuǎn)化型搶劫罪的司法認(rèn)定在理論界和司法實務(wù)界一直是個爭議的熱點。筆者著重從搶劫轉(zhuǎn)化的前提條件、客觀條件、主觀條件三個方面進(jìn)行論述。同時,對已滿14周歲未滿16周歲的人能否構(gòu)成轉(zhuǎn)化型搶劫展開研討。第二,關(guān)于搶劫罪的情節(jié)加重犯和結(jié)果加重犯的認(rèn)定,專門針對刑法263條規(guī)定的八項加重犯情節(jié)進(jìn)行分析,重點解析“入戶搶劫”、“在交通工具上搶劫”、“持槍搶劫”三項規(guī)定。第三,關(guān)于搶劫罪的停止形態(tài)問題,筆者在對搶劫罪的既遂、未遂、犯罪預(yù)備和犯罪中止進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)論述。 第三部分,對搶劫罪與其他屬于強(qiáng)取型的侵犯財產(chǎn)的犯罪予以辨析。在司法實踐中,由于行為人搶劫財物的行為方式多種多樣,加上犯罪構(gòu)成特征上的相似性,容易導(dǎo)致?lián)尳僮锱c搶奪罪、搶劫罪、敲詐勒索罪、綁架罪、聚眾哄搶罪、尋釁滋事罪、強(qiáng)迫交易罪的犯罪相混淆,為了準(zhǔn)確認(rèn)定搶劫罪,準(zhǔn)確適用刑罰,有必要對搶劫罪與相關(guān)易混犯罪進(jìn)行辨析。在這一部分,筆者主要從搶劫罪的基本構(gòu)成特征出發(fā),分析其顯著區(qū)別于其他易混犯罪的地方,力圖尋找一種顯著的區(qū)分點,認(rèn)定不同的犯罪。
[Abstract]:Robbery is a more frequent crime in judicial practice and has always been the focus of our country's judicial organs. However, in the judicial practice, due to the fact that the relevant judicial practice departments have different understandings on the constitutive characteristics of the crime of robbery and judicial cognizance, there are many disputes, which is not conducive to the accurate identification and punishment of the crime of robbery. According to the relevant criminal law theory, combined with the author's criminal judicial practice, combined with a large number of real cases handled by the author, this paper discusses the common problems in the practice of determining the crime of robbery. The text of this paper is divided into three parts: the author analyzes the concept and characteristics of robbery, and in this part, through the practice of the concept of robbery and the case of the identification of the characteristics of the constitution. In order to make a clear definition of the concept and characteristics of robbery. The second part: combined with specific cases, the author discusses the common problems in the crime of robbery. This paper mainly discusses the determination of transformed robbery crime, the determination of aggravated circumstances and resultant aggravated crime, and the problem of stopping form of robbery crime. First, judicial cognizance of transformed robbery is always a hot topic in theory and judicial practice. The author focuses on three aspects: precondition, objective condition and subjective condition of robbery transformation. At the same time, whether the person who has reached the age of 14 and under 16 can constitute a transformational robbery is discussed. Second, with regard to the determination of aggravated and consequential aggravated crimes of robbery, this article specifically analyzes the eight aggravating circumstances stipulated in Article 263 of the Criminal Law, focusing on the analysis of "robbery in the house" and "robbery on means of transport." There are three rules for armed robbery. Thirdly, on the form of stopping robbery, the author systematically discusses the accomplishment, attempt, crime preparation and discontinuance of robbery. In the third part, the crime of robbery and other crimes of infringing property are analyzed. In judicial practice, due to the variety of behaviors of the perpetrator of robbing property and the similarity of the constitution of the crime, it is easy to lead to the crime of robbery and robbery, extortion, kidnapping and mass robbery. In order to accurately identify the crime of robbery and apply the penalty accurately, it is necessary to discriminate and analyze the crime of robbery and the related easily mixed crime. In this part, the author mainly starts from the basic constitution characteristic of robbery crime, analyzes its remarkable difference from other easily mixed crime, tries to find a kind of remarkable distinguishing point, and finds out different crime.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 羅翔;論轉(zhuǎn)化型搶劫罪[J];北京市政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2001年02期

2 劉曉莉,于寧;略論搶劫罪中“結(jié)果加重犯”的加重條件[J];長春師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2000年01期

3 吳學(xué)斌;搶劫罪中“暴力”內(nèi)涵的司法認(rèn)定[J];重慶工學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年10期

4 王東明;;搶劫罪主體的法理分析與司法認(rèn)定[J];電子科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(社科版);2010年02期

5 劉明祥;論搶劫罪的加重犯[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年01期

6 肖中華;論搶劫罪適用中的幾個問題[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;1998年05期

7 崔淑霞,趙寶元;論搶劫罪實務(wù)的三個問題[J];大慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年03期

8 張建榮;;轉(zhuǎn)化型搶劫罪司法適用若干問題探討[J];達(dá)縣師范高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報;2006年03期

9 魏宏斌;略論敲詐勒索罪的兩個重要問題[J];福建師大福清分校學(xué)報;2003年04期

10 曾傳紅;論刑法中“入戶搶劫”的認(rèn)定[J];福建公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報.社會公共安全研究;2002年01期

，

本文編號：2031067