發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-14 23:13

  本文選題：風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì) + 風(fēng)險(xiǎn)刑法��； 參考：《煙臺(tái)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來，危險(xiǎn)駕駛行為頻發(fā)并且造成了惡劣的社會(huì)影響。在風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)下,為了對(duì)危險(xiǎn)駕駛行為進(jìn)行有效地調(diào)控，《刑法修正案八》將危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪作為新增罪名在刑法中予以規(guī)定。危險(xiǎn)駕駛行為的入罪，表明國家保護(hù)公民的合法權(quán)利和維護(hù)社會(huì)公共秩序的決心。本文立足于當(dāng)前的現(xiàn)實(shí)，對(duì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)刑法觀念下的危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪進(jìn)行分析和闡述。 本文正文共分為四部分。在第一章中，首先介紹了風(fēng)險(xiǎn)刑法的基本理論。風(fēng)險(xiǎn)刑法是風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)的產(chǎn)物，它所保護(hù)的法益是抽象的；適用的范圍具有擴(kuò)張性，更多體現(xiàn)的是行為無價(jià)值理論；風(fēng)險(xiǎn)刑法關(guān)注的重點(diǎn)是危險(xiǎn)犯，目的是為了降低社會(huì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，增強(qiáng)主體的安全感。但在近期內(nèi)，傳統(tǒng)刑法理論仍是刑法的主導(dǎo)理論，風(fēng)險(xiǎn)刑法只是傳統(tǒng)刑法理論的有益補(bǔ)充，不會(huì)取代傳統(tǒng)刑法理論成為刑法的主導(dǎo)理論。緊接著，筆者對(duì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)刑法理論在國內(nèi)外的應(yīng)用價(jià)值進(jìn)行了考察，發(fā)現(xiàn)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)刑法早在二十世紀(jì)五六十年代就在國外環(huán)境、產(chǎn)品責(zé)任和交通安全領(lǐng)域得到了廣泛應(yīng)用，而我國《刑法修正案八》的通過，是風(fēng)險(xiǎn)刑法觀念在我國刑法產(chǎn)品責(zé)任領(lǐng)域與交通安全領(lǐng)域適用的體現(xiàn)。 從第二章起，，本文開始對(duì)我國的危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪進(jìn)行解析。我國規(guī)定的危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪有兩種類型：“飆車”型危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪和“醉駕”型危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪。文章首先對(duì)這兩種類型的危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪的客觀行為進(jìn)行細(xì)致的分析，然后對(duì)危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪主觀方面的爭議進(jìn)行理性思考，得出危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪的主觀方面是故意的結(jié)論，最后對(duì)本罪的出罪機(jī)制予以探討，論證了“醉駕”型危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪是不可以適用刑法第13條但書的規(guī)定的。 通過上文對(duì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)刑法理論和危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪的介紹，文章第三部分就可以對(duì)兩者的關(guān)系進(jìn)行分析。在此之前，首先要對(duì)危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪的性質(zhì)予以明確。在對(duì)危險(xiǎn)犯及其相關(guān)的具體危險(xiǎn)犯與抽象危險(xiǎn)犯劃分之后，筆者得出“飆車”型危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪是具體危險(xiǎn)犯，“醉駕”型危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪是抽象危險(xiǎn)犯，并在第二節(jié)中對(duì)危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪符合風(fēng)險(xiǎn)刑法觀從立法與司法上進(jìn)行了詳述。 在論證了危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪符合風(fēng)險(xiǎn)刑法觀念的基礎(chǔ)之上，筆者主張應(yīng)用風(fēng)險(xiǎn)刑法的相關(guān)理論對(duì)危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪中的缺陷進(jìn)行規(guī)制。在注意危險(xiǎn)犯的擴(kuò)張與風(fēng)險(xiǎn)刑法的有限適用之下，筆者傾向于對(duì)危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪從三個(gè)方面進(jìn)行規(guī)制：一、設(shè)制開放性款，擴(kuò)大風(fēng)險(xiǎn)刑法理念的應(yīng)用范圍；二、明確“飆車型”危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪“情節(jié)惡劣”的情形，限制風(fēng)險(xiǎn)刑法的適用；三、規(guī)定“醉駕”的臨檢程序，從實(shí)際操作中規(guī)范法律的適用。
[Abstract]:In recent years, dangerous driving has been frequent and has caused a bad social impact. In the risk society, in order to control the dangerous driving behavior effectively, the criminal law amendment eight > defines the crime of dangerous driving as a new crime in the criminal law. The crime of dangerous driving indicates that the state protects the legal rights of citizens and the maintenance of the society. This article, based on the current reality, analyzes and expounds the crime of dangerous driving under the concept of risk criminal law.
The text of this article is divided into four parts. In the first chapter, the basic theory of the risk criminal law is first introduced. The risk criminal law is the product of the risk society. The legal benefit it protects is abstract; the scope of the application is expansionary, and more embodies the theory of the value of the behavior. The focus of the risk criminal law is the dangerous crime, the purpose is to reduce the risk. Social risk enhances the sense of security of the subject. But in the near future, the traditional criminal theory is still the dominant theory of the criminal law, and the risk criminal law is only a beneficial supplement to the traditional criminal law theory, and it will not replace the traditional criminal theory as the dominant theory of the criminal law. The criminal law was widely used in the field of foreign environment, product liability and traffic safety as early as 50s and 60s twentieth Century, and the adoption of the eight amendment of criminal law in China was the embodiment of the application of the concept of risk criminal law in the field of product liability and traffic safety in China's criminal law.
From the second chapter, this article begins to analyze the crime of dangerous driving in our country. There are two types of dangerous driving crime in our country: "drag racing" type dangerous driving crime and "drunk driving" type dangerous driving crime. The article first analyzes the objective behavior of the two types of dangerous driving crime, and then to the subjective side of dangerous driving crime. The subjective aspect of the crime of dangerous driving is a deliberate conclusion. Finally, the crime mechanism of the crime is discussed. It is demonstrated that the "drunk driving" type of dangerous driving is not applicable to the thirteenth proviso of the criminal law.
Through the introduction of the theory of risk criminal law and the crime of dangerous driving, the third part of the article can analyze the relationship between the two. Before this, the nature of the crime of dangerous driving should be clarified first. After the division of dangerous offenders and related specific dangerous offenders and abstract dangerous criminals, the author draws the crime of "drag racing" type dangerous driving. It is a specific dangerous crime, the "drunk driving" type of dangerous driving crime is an abstract dangerous crime, and in the second section of the dangerous driving crime conforms to the risk of the criminal law view from the legislation and judicature.
On the basis of demonstrating that the dangerous driving crime conforms to the concept of the risk criminal law, the author advocates the application of the relevant theory of the risk criminal law to regulate the defects in the crime of dangerous driving. Under the limited application of the expansion of dangerous criminals and the limited application of the risk criminal law, the author tends to regulate the crime of dangerous driving from three aspects: first, the establishment and opening up of the criminal law To expand the scope of the application of the concept of the risk of criminal law; two, to define the "bad circumstances" of the "drag racing" dangerous driving crime, to limit the application of the risk criminal law; three, to stipulate the procedure of the "drunk driving", and to standardize the application of the law from the actual operation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：煙臺(tái)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王世洲;德國環(huán)境刑法中污染概念的研究[J];比較法研究;2001年02期

2 蘇彩霞;危險(xiǎn)犯及其相關(guān)概念之辨析——兼評(píng)刑法分則第116條與第119條第1款之關(guān)系[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2001年03期

3 李川;;論危險(xiǎn)駕駛行為入罪的客觀標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2012年04期

4 劉憲權(quán);;處理高危駕車肇事案件的應(yīng)然標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];法學(xué);2009年09期

5 趙秉志;袁彬;;醉駕入刑諸問題新探討[J];法學(xué)雜志;2012年08期

6 劉憲權(quán);周舟;;危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪主觀方面的刑法分析[J];東方法學(xué);2013年01期

7 管彥杰;聶慧蘋;;對(duì)醉酒駕車之新增刑法規(guī)定的質(zhì)問和解釋[J];河北法學(xué);2012年08期

8 李朝暉;;危險(xiǎn)駕駛行為犯罪化的應(yīng)然表述[J];江漢論壇;2011年06期

9 薛曉源,劉國良;全球風(fēng)險(xiǎn)世界:現(xiàn)在與未來——德國著名社會(huì)學(xué)家、風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)理論創(chuàng)始人烏爾里�！へ惪私淌谠L談錄[J];馬克思主義與現(xiàn)實(shí);2005年01期

10 孫國祥;黃星;;醉酒駕車之刑事法規(guī)制進(jìn)路分析[J];法學(xué)論壇;2009年06期

本文編號(hào)：2019384