發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-12 22:14

  本文選題：組織賣淫罪 + 組織行為　； 參考：《江西理工大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：組織賣淫罪作為我國(guó)刑法罪名中的“新生兒”,直到1997年刑法才正式確立,而條文中僅以簡(jiǎn)單罪狀形式加以規(guī)范,難以解決司法實(shí)踐中各種疑難問題,筆者擬針對(duì)本罪爭(zhēng)議問題提出自己的觀點(diǎn),以期盡早解決爭(zhēng)議。文章共分為四個(gè)部分,第一部分為組織賣淫罪的立法概況與概念厘定。首先是將我國(guó)組織賣淫罪的立法沿革以及國(guó)外賣淫嫖娼類犯罪的立法概況整合梳理,認(rèn)為國(guó)外對(duì)于“賣淫”概念的界定對(duì)我國(guó)具有借鑒意義,同時(shí)在刑罰上可以參照國(guó)外規(guī)定對(duì)不同手段行為下的行為根據(jù)其情節(jié)惡劣程度及社會(huì)危害性給予不同法定刑。其次,筆者通過(guò)對(duì)本罪概念所包含的重要要素進(jìn)行一一分析,得出組織賣淫罪具體含義是行為人采用招募、雇傭、強(qiáng)迫、引誘、容留、介紹等手段,對(duì)多人達(dá)到管理控制地位并安排其進(jìn)行賣淫活動(dòng)的行為。第二部分為組織賣淫罪構(gòu)成要件爭(zhēng)議問題探究。客體上,應(yīng)當(dāng)認(rèn)為本罪的犯罪客體為社會(huì)性道德風(fēng)尚,不包括人身自由權(quán)。犯罪對(duì)象不僅限于婦女,也包括男性。客觀要件上,應(yīng)當(dāng)認(rèn)為單純提供“手淫”服務(wù)不構(gòu)成刑法意義上的“賣淫”行為,對(duì)其組織者也當(dāng)然不能成立組織賣淫罪,同時(shí),“強(qiáng)迫”手段應(yīng)當(dāng)納入“組織行為”當(dāng)中。本罪主體為一般主體,并且單位不能構(gòu)成本罪;主觀上要求行為人只能是在直接故意的心態(tài)下完成本罪的客觀行為。第三部分為組織賣淫罪的罪間問題探究。首先是對(duì)本罪與協(xié)助組織賣淫罪的界限進(jìn)行劃分,并認(rèn)為在組織賣淫罪當(dāng)中應(yīng)當(dāng)有主從犯的劃分,組織賣淫罪的從犯應(yīng)該包括次要實(shí)行犯和幫助犯,而協(xié)助組織賣淫罪僅僅是對(duì)于本罪幫助犯的規(guī)定,而非次要實(shí)行犯。其次,分析了本罪與強(qiáng)迫賣淫罪之間的界限問題,應(yīng)當(dāng)認(rèn)為,兩個(gè)罪名區(qū)分之關(guān)鍵在于組織賣淫行為所具有的組織性特點(diǎn)。最后是本罪與引誘、容留、介紹賣淫罪間的區(qū)分問題,二者的區(qū)分重點(diǎn)主要在于行為的組織性和對(duì)賣淫活動(dòng)的“控制”。第四部分為組織賣淫罪的刑罰問題探究。首先,死刑的廢除不會(huì)構(gòu)成對(duì)罪行極其嚴(yán)重以及與黑社會(huì)勢(shì)力相勾結(jié)的組織賣淫行為的放縱。同時(shí)在刑罰上應(yīng)適當(dāng)降低本罪的起刑點(diǎn),增設(shè)短期自由刑的規(guī)定。其次,本罪在刑罰上應(yīng)當(dāng)重于強(qiáng)迫賣淫罪。同時(shí)應(yīng)在刑罰設(shè)置上劃分一定等級(jí),對(duì)于采用“強(qiáng)迫”方式的組織賣淫罪應(yīng)規(guī)定重于采用他種手段行為的法定刑。
[Abstract]:The crime of organizing prostitution, as the "newborn" in the criminal law of our country, was not formally established until 1997, and the articles were only standardized in the form of simple counts, so it is difficult to solve all kinds of difficult problems in judicial practice. The author intends to put forward his own point of view in order to resolve the dispute as soon as possible. The article is divided into four parts. The first part is the legislative survey and definition of the crime of organizing prostitution. First of all, the legislative evolution of the crime of organizing prostitution in China and the legislative overview of the crime of prostitution in foreign countries are integrated, and the definition of the concept of "prostitution" in foreign countries is considered to be of reference significance to our country. At the same time, according to the provisions of foreign countries, different legal penalties can be given according to the bad circumstances and social harmfulness of acts under different means. Secondly, through the analysis of the important elements contained in the concept of this crime, the author comes to the conclusion that the specific meaning of the crime of organizing prostitution is that the perpetrator adopts the means of recruitment, employment, coercion, inducement, shelter, introduction, etc. The act of controlling a group of people and arranging for prostitution. The second part is about the dispute of the constitution of the crime of organization prostitution. On the object, the crime object of this crime should be regarded as social morality, excluding the right to personal liberty. The target of the crime is not only women, but men as well. On the objective elements, it should be considered that simply providing "masturbation" service does not constitute "prostitution" in the sense of criminal law, nor can the organizers of it establish the crime of organizing prostitution, at the same time, the means of "compulsion" should be included in the "organization act". The subject of the crime is the general subject and the unit cannot constitute the crime; subjectively, the perpetrator can only accomplish the objective act of the crime in the direct and intentional state of mind. The third part probes into the crime of organizing prostitution. First of all, the division between this crime and the crime of assisting the organization of prostitution is carried out, and the author thinks that there should be the division of the principal and subordinate in the crime of organizing prostitution, and the accomplice of the crime of organizing prostitution should include the secondary crime and the assistant crime. The crime of aiding the organization of prostitution is only a provision for the crime of aiding, not a secondary crime. Secondly, the paper analyzes the boundary between this crime and the crime of forced prostitution. It should be considered that the key to the distinction between the two crimes lies in the organizational characteristics of the organized prostitution. Finally, it introduces the distinction between the crime of prostitution and the crime of inducement, accommodation and prostitution. The main focus of the distinction lies in the organization of behavior and the "control" of prostitution. The fourth part probes into the punishment of the crime of organizing prostitution. First of all, the abolition of the death penalty would not constitute an indulgence of crimes and prostitution in association with triad forces. At the same time, we should reduce the starting point of this crime and add the stipulation of short-term free penalty. Secondly, the penalty of this crime should be heavier than the crime of forced prostitution. At the same time, the penalty should be divided into certain levels, and the crime of organization prostitution by "compulsion" should be more severe than the statutory punishment of using other means.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D924.36

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 苗有水;組織他人賣淫罪若干問題研究[J];中外法學(xué);1996年03期

2 蘇哲;組織、強(qiáng)迫、引誘、容留、介紹賣淫罪[J];江蘇公安�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);1999年04期

3 孫彩虹;日本犯罪被害人保護(hù)法制度及其對(duì)我們的啟示[J];河南社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年05期

4 周海洋;;賣淫相關(guān)犯罪探究[J];山東警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年05期

5 陳興良;;組織男性從事同性性交易行為之定性研究——對(duì)李寧案的分析[J];國(guó)家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

6 周偉良,張亦林;組織男性提供性服務(wù)行為的定性辨析[J];公安學(xué)刊.浙江公安高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期

7 顧美英;;組織賣淫罪的法律適用[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年06期

8 肖乾利;季理華;;組織、介紹同性賣淫行為的定性與刑法解釋觀念[J];河西學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

9 趙秉志;;論犯罪實(shí)行行為著手的含義[J];東方法學(xué);2008年01期

10 徐光華;;刑法解釋立場(chǎng)的歷史考察——主觀解釋論之提倡[J];河北法學(xué);2008年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 趙軍;賣淫刑事政策實(shí)證研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 金亞萍;組織賣淫罪疑難問題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2014年

2 江靜;組織賣淫罪相關(guān)問題研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2013年

3 張啟明;論組織賣淫罪的認(rèn)定[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

4 劉鵬程;組織賣淫罪客觀要件研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2008年

5 黃浩;論組織賣淫罪[D];武漢大學(xué);2004年

6 張永席;組織賣淫罪研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號(hào)：2011266