發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-10 04:29

  本文選題：聚眾斗毆 + 犯罪構(gòu)成��； 參考：《蘇州大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：聚眾斗毆罪作為聚眾犯罪的一種，在我國(guó)的刑事司法實(shí)踐中極為常見，但我國(guó)現(xiàn)行刑法對(duì)其沒(méi)有明確、完善的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，學(xué)界對(duì)其相關(guān)理論也缺乏共識(shí)，導(dǎo)致實(shí)際司法處理該罪時(shí)參照標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與最終裁判結(jié)果差異較大。本文在厘清“聚眾斗毆罪”概念的基礎(chǔ)上，著重分析了聚眾斗毆犯罪情節(jié)的四個(gè)法定要素，，分別從犯罪次數(shù)、主體人數(shù)、規(guī)模以及犯罪方式等四個(gè)方面逐一進(jìn)行論述，為聚眾斗毆犯罪確立入罪標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，并詳細(xì)闡釋了聚眾斗毆的加重情節(jié)以及內(nèi)在邏輯。針對(duì)聚眾斗毆罪的轉(zhuǎn)化問(wèn)題，本文從基本罪的犯罪行為、犯罪狀態(tài)以及不同的犯罪主體分析聚眾斗毆犯罪轉(zhuǎn)化的條件，為聚眾斗毆犯罪轉(zhuǎn)化確立認(rèn)定方法。最后本文對(duì)聚眾斗毆罪中存在的其他疑難問(wèn)題進(jìn)行論述，解決了司法實(shí)務(wù)中該罪存在的問(wèn)題。
[Abstract]:As a kind of mass crime, the crime of affray is very common in the criminal judicial practice of our country. However, the current criminal law of our country does not have clear and perfect standards for its cognizance, and there is also a lack of consensus in academic circles on its related theories. As a result, there is a great difference between the standard of reference and the result of final judgment in the actual judicial treatment of the crime. On the basis of clarifying the concept of "affray crime", this paper emphatically analyzes the four legal elements of the crime of affray crime, which are discussed one by one from four aspects: the number of crimes, the number of subjects, the scale and the way of crime. This paper establishes the standard of incrimination for the affray crime, and explains in detail the aggravating circumstances and internal logic of the affray. In view of the transformation of the crime of affray, this paper analyzes the conditions of the transformation of the crime of affray from the basic crime, the state of the crime and the different subject of the crime, and establishes the identification method for the transformation of the crime of affray. Finally, this paper discusses the other difficult problems in the crime of affray, and solves the problems in the judicial practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張屹,段怡;聚眾斗毆罪適用法律的若干問(wèn)題[J];法律適用;2003年Z1期

2 陳興良;;刑法競(jìng)合論[J];法商研究;2006年02期

3 張菁;;聚眾斗毆罪的司法認(rèn)定[J];法學(xué);2006年03期

4 李彬彬;李施思;;聚眾斗毆罪基本問(wèn)題探析[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬刊);2008年09期

5 羅素君;吳曉娜;;聚眾斗毆罪中轉(zhuǎn)化犯主體之探析[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年23期

6 王巍娜;;聚眾斗毆罪司法認(rèn)定中的若干疑難問(wèn)題[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年16期

7 王波峰;解慶利;;聚眾斗毆罪若干爭(zhēng)議問(wèn)題研究[J];廣西社會(huì)主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

8 張?jiān)歧?;聚眾斗毆案件認(rèn)定的若干爭(zhēng)議問(wèn)題研究[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年28期

9 孫桂京;;淺議聚眾斗毆罪的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年06期

10 樓]Z洪;;聚眾斗毆罪若干問(wèn)題探析[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年29期

本文編號(hào)：2001976