發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-09 22:31

  本文選題：盜竊罪 + 多次盜竊　； 參考：《河北大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：在“多次盜竊”的司法認(rèn)定上，主要涉及“多次盜竊”的時(shí)間和空間、既遂與未遂以及行為類型等問(wèn)題�！岸啻伪I竊”的時(shí)間是指數(shù)次盜竊行為之間的時(shí)間間隔長(zhǎng)短對(duì)于盜竊次數(shù)的認(rèn)定可以產(chǎn)生影響；多次盜竊的空間是指數(shù)次盜竊行為之間空間間隔距離的遠(yuǎn)近對(duì)于盜竊次數(shù)的認(rèn)定可以產(chǎn)生影響。成立“多次盜竊”的既遂，要求行為人在兩年之內(nèi)實(shí)施了三次相互獨(dú)立的具有刑事可罰性的盜竊既遂行為；成立“多次盜竊”的未遂，要求行為人實(shí)施的三次盜竊行為中存在未遂形態(tài)。多次盜竊的類型三種，分別是單純的“多次盜竊”行為，數(shù)額型盜竊行為與單純“多次盜竊”行為的疊加，不同的非數(shù)額型盜竊行為的疊加。 在“入戶盜竊”的司法認(rèn)定上，主要涉及“戶”和“入戶”的含義、“入戶盜竊”的既遂與未遂及其與相關(guān)犯罪的關(guān)系。“戶”是指具有封閉性、私密性的居住功能場(chǎng)所；“入戶”是指以非法方式侵入他人住宅的行為。成立“入戶盜竊”的既遂，要求以“開(kāi)始物色財(cái)物”為著手時(shí)間點(diǎn)，并且竊取到具有刑法保護(hù)價(jià)值的一定財(cái)物；成立“入戶盜竊”的未遂，要求入戶盜竊行為已經(jīng)進(jìn)入實(shí)行階段，但由于意志以外的原因而未得逞�！叭霊舯I竊”在一定條件下可能轉(zhuǎn)化為非法侵入住宅罪或者搶劫罪。 在“攜帶兇器盜竊”的司法認(rèn)定上，主要涉及“攜帶”的含義和“兇器”的范圍、“攜帶兇器盜竊”的既遂與未遂及其轉(zhuǎn)化犯問(wèn)題�！皵y帶”是指隨身將物品置于身上或放在身邊，使之處于隨時(shí)可支配狀態(tài)下的行為；“兇器”的范圍包含性質(zhì)意義上的兇器與用法意義上的兇器。成立“攜帶兇器盜竊”的既遂，要求行為人主觀上對(duì)于兇器具有認(rèn)識(shí)和利用意圖，在盜竊實(shí)行階段攜帶了兇器并竊得了他人的財(cái)物；成立“攜帶兇器盜竊”的未遂，要求行為人因?yàn)橐庵疽酝獾脑�因致使盜竊未得逞或者并未竊取到具有刑法保護(hù)價(jià)值的財(cái)物�！皵y帶兇器盜竊”一定條件下可以轉(zhuǎn)化為搶劫罪。 在“扒竊”的司法認(rèn)定上，主要涉及“扒竊”的概念和基本特征、“扒竊”的既遂與未遂及其轉(zhuǎn)化犯問(wèn)題�！鞍歉`”的概念是指行為人以非法占有為目的，違背他人意志，在一定場(chǎng)所竊取他人隨身攜帶的具有緊密占有與支配屬性的公私財(cái)物的行為。“扒竊”具有多為慣犯作案、不固定于公共場(chǎng)所、危害性大等基本特征。成立“扒竊”的既遂，要求行為人在一定的場(chǎng)所條件下，，竊得他人隨身攜帶的具有刑法保護(hù)價(jià)值的財(cái)物；成立“扒竊”的未遂，要求行為人因?yàn)橐庵疽酝獾脑�因而致使盜竊未得逞�！鞍歉`”在一定條件下可以轉(zhuǎn)化為搶劫罪或者搶奪罪。
[Abstract]:In the judicial cognizance of "multiple theft", it mainly involves the time and space of "multiple theft", accomplished and attempted, and the type of behavior. The time of "multiple theft" means that the time interval between several times of theft can have an impact on the identification of the number of times of theft; The space of multiple theft refers to the distance between several times of theft, which can affect the identification of times of theft. The establishment of "multiple thefts" requires the perpetrator to carry out three independent criminal punishable acts of accomplished theft within two years, and to establish the attempt of "multiple theft". There is an attempted form in the three times of thefts that the actor is required to carry out. There are three types of multiple theft, namely, simple "multiple theft", the superposition between the amount of theft and the simple "multiple theft", the superposition of different non-amount theft, and the judicial recognition of "burglary". It mainly deals with the meaning of "household" and "household entry", the accomplice and attempt of "burglary" and its relationship with related crimes. "Household" refers to a closed, private living function place, and "entering a house" refers to the illegal invasion of other people's residence. The successful establishment of "burglary" requires that "the beginning of the search for property" be taken as the starting point, and that certain property of criminal law protection value be stolen, and that the attempted "burglary into the household" be established. The request for burglary has entered the stage of practice, but has not succeeded due to reasons other than will. Under certain conditions, "burglary" may be transformed into a crime of trespassing on a house or a crime of robbery. In the judicial determination of "burglary with murder weapon", it mainly involves the meaning of "carrying" and the scope of "weapon of murder". The problems of accomplished and attempted robbery with murder weapon and its transformed offense. "carrying" refers to the act of placing objects on or around them and making them at their disposal at any time. The scope of "murder weapon" includes the weapon of nature and the weapon of use. The establishment of the accomplished means of "armed theft with the murder weapon" requires the perpetrator to have subjective understanding and intention to use the weapon, to carry the weapon and steal the property of others in the stage of the theft, and to establish the attempt of "theft with the weapon with the murder weapon", The perpetrator is not successful or has not stolen the property which has the value of criminal law protection. In the judicial cognizance of "pickpocketing", the concept and basic characteristics of "pickpocketing" and the problems of accomplished and attempted pickpocketing and its transforming offense are mainly involved. The concept of "pickpocketing" refers to the behavior of the perpetrator who, against the will of others, steals the public and private property with the property of possession and domination, which is carried by others in a certain place, for the purpose of illegal possession. Pickpocketing has the basic characteristics of recidivism, not fixed in public places, great harmfulness and so on. The establishment of "pickpocketing" requires the perpetrator to steal the property with criminal law protection value carried by others under certain place conditions, and the attempt to set up "pickpocketing", The demand actor causes the theft to fail because of the reason other than will. Pickpocketing can be transformed into robbery or robbery under certain conditions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.35

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 陳家林;;論刑法中的扒竊——對(duì)《刑法修正案(八)》的分析與解讀[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2011年04期

2 肖中華;論搶劫罪適用中的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1998年05期

3 周振想,林維;搶劫罪特別類型研究[J];人民檢察;1999年01期

4 黃祥青;;認(rèn)定多次盜竊的事實(shí)與法理依據(jù)[J];人民司法;2009年09期

5 張德友;試析入戶盜竊之處斷[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2000年04期

6 薛進(jìn)展;蔡正華;;扒竊型盜竊罪研究——以《刑法修正案(八)》相關(guān)規(guī)定為背景[J];天津法學(xué);2012年03期

7 車浩;;“扒竊”入刑:貼身禁忌與行為人刑法[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2013年01期

本文編號(hào)：2001050