論司法判決書中的（非）禮貌現(xiàn)象及其客觀性
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2020-11-01 11:45
本文采用語(yǔ)言學(xué)理論對(duì)判決書中出現(xiàn)的禮貌現(xiàn)象進(jìn)行研究。本文提到的禮貌現(xiàn)象并不是平常意義上的禮貌用語(yǔ)，它涉及到禮貌和非禮貌兩種情況。面子是人們?cè)诨ハ嘟煌斜陡姓滟F的東西。我們?cè)诮浑H中會(huì)給面子，留面子或者丟面子。要做到為對(duì)方保留面子，使用禮貌策略是一個(gè)重要手段。但是在任何交往中，人們并非時(shí)刻會(huì)考慮到要為對(duì)方留面子，特別是在說(shuō)話人與聽話人權(quán)利地位不平衡的情況下，對(duì)聽話人面子的威脅也是一種語(yǔ)言策略，能為說(shuō)話人更好的達(dá)到目的服務(wù)。在司法判決書中，這種禮貌現(xiàn)象與非禮貌現(xiàn)象得到了很好的體現(xiàn)。當(dāng)法官對(duì)當(dāng)事人或下級(jí)法院意見持同意態(tài)度時(shí)，他會(huì)使用各種禮貌策略來(lái)明確表達(dá)他的肯定的態(tài)度，這同時(shí)也是對(duì)當(dāng)事面子進(jìn)行維護(hù)的一種做法。當(dāng)法官對(duì)當(dāng)事人或下級(jí)法院意見持不同意見時(shí)，有時(shí)則會(huì)因考慮聽話人的面子問(wèn)題而做出含糊的甚至不合理的判決。 本文通過(guò)對(duì)司法判決書中的禮貌現(xiàn)象的研究，旨在發(fā)現(xiàn)主要的禮貌與非禮貌策略及其語(yǔ)言實(shí)現(xiàn)形式，提示禮貌策略對(duì)法官客觀表達(dá)其觀點(diǎn)起到一定作用。根據(jù)Brown Levinson的面子理論和Culpeper關(guān)于非禮貌策略的觀點(diǎn)，我們?cè)谡Z(yǔ)料中區(qū)分了法官所使用的禮貌策略與非禮貌策略。研究表明，在司法判決這種相當(dāng)正式和具有強(qiáng)制性的文件中，禮貌與非禮貌現(xiàn)象都是大量存在并廣泛運(yùn)用的一種語(yǔ)言現(xiàn)象。 司法判決中的禮貌與非禮貌現(xiàn)象與日常生活中的禮貌現(xiàn)象所發(fā)揮的作用不同，法官需要協(xié)調(diào)人際關(guān)系，解決爭(zhēng)端，最終達(dá)到客觀、公正的判決。適當(dāng)?shù)倪\(yùn)用禮貌與非禮貌策略對(duì)于法官做出客觀的判決起到積極的作用。 希望本文有助于加深對(duì)禮貌的了解，使人們認(rèn)識(shí)到禮貌現(xiàn)象對(duì)實(shí)現(xiàn)客觀、合理的審判起到積極作用，有助于法官更好的運(yùn)用禮貌與非禮貌策略使自己的判決更能讓當(dāng)事人及廣大群眾心服口服。同時(shí)，本研究對(duì)法律教學(xué)與司法文件翻譯都能起到一定的啟發(fā)作用。
【學(xué)位單位】：廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位年份】：2006
【中圖分類】：D90-055;D916.1
【文章目錄】：
DECLARATION
Acknowledgment
Abstract
摘要
List of figures and tables
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Rationale
1.3 Objectives
1.4 Data and methodology
1.5 The organization of the thesis
Chapter 2 Review of Related Literature
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Studies on objectivity in judicial judgments
2.1.1 Studies on objectivity in Chinese judicial judgments
2.2.2 Studies on objectivity in English judgments
2.3 Studies on politeness
2.3.1 Lakoff's politeness rules
2.3.2 Leech's Politeness Principles
2.2.3 Brown and Levinson's Theory of Politeness
2.3 Impoliteness work inspired by B&L's theory
2.4 Studies on politeness in legal context
2.5 Summary
Chapter 3 Theoretic framework and procedures
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Definition of key terms
3.2.1 Politeness
3.2.2 Impoliteness
3.2.3 （im）Politeness phenomena
3.3 Theoretical Background of the Present Study
3.3.1 Brown & Levinson's Politeness Theory
3.3.2 Culpeper's impoliteness framework
3.3.3 Objectivity Theory
3.4 Description of a Theoretical Framework
3.5 Procedures
3.5.1 The use of politeness strategies in agreement
3.5.2 The function of the politeness and impoliteness strategies
3.6 Summary
Chapter 4 Politeness and impoliteness strategies in judgments
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Politeness strategies
4.2.1 Positive politeness strategies in agreement
4.2.2 Negative politeness strategies
4.3 Impoliteness strategies
4.3.1 Positive impoliteness strategies
4.3.2 Negative impoliteness strategies
4.4 Speech acts to realize the （im）politeness strategies
4.4.1 The speech acts of politeness strategies
4.4.2 Speech acts of impoliteness
4.5 Summary
Chapter 5 Functionality of （Im）Politeness Phenomena in Judicial Judgments
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Objectivity theories and （im）politeness phenomena
5.3 Objectivity reflected in the politeness strategies
5.4 Objectivity reflected in the impoliteness
5.5 Summary
Chapter 6 Conclusion
6.1 Summary of the present study
6.2 Conclusion
6.3 Implications
6.4 Limitations and suggestions for further research
References
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
本文編號(hào)：2865485
【學(xué)位單位】：廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位年份】：2006
【中圖分類】：D90-055;D916.1
【文章目錄】：
DECLARATION
Acknowledgment
Abstract
摘要
List of figures and tables
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Rationale
1.3 Objectives
1.4 Data and methodology
1.5 The organization of the thesis
Chapter 2 Review of Related Literature
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Studies on objectivity in judicial judgments
2.1.1 Studies on objectivity in Chinese judicial judgments
2.2.2 Studies on objectivity in English judgments
2.3 Studies on politeness
2.3.1 Lakoff's politeness rules
2.3.2 Leech's Politeness Principles
2.2.3 Brown and Levinson's Theory of Politeness
2.3 Impoliteness work inspired by B&L's theory
2.4 Studies on politeness in legal context
2.5 Summary
Chapter 3 Theoretic framework and procedures
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Definition of key terms
3.2.1 Politeness
3.2.2 Impoliteness
3.2.3 （im）Politeness phenomena
3.3 Theoretical Background of the Present Study
3.3.1 Brown & Levinson's Politeness Theory
3.3.2 Culpeper's impoliteness framework
3.3.3 Objectivity Theory
3.4 Description of a Theoretical Framework
3.5 Procedures
3.5.1 The use of politeness strategies in agreement
3.5.2 The function of the politeness and impoliteness strategies
3.6 Summary
Chapter 4 Politeness and impoliteness strategies in judgments
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Politeness strategies
4.2.1 Positive politeness strategies in agreement
4.2.2 Negative politeness strategies
4.3 Impoliteness strategies
4.3.1 Positive impoliteness strategies
4.3.2 Negative impoliteness strategies
4.4 Speech acts to realize the （im）politeness strategies
4.4.1 The speech acts of politeness strategies
4.4.2 Speech acts of impoliteness
4.5 Summary
Chapter 5 Functionality of （Im）Politeness Phenomena in Judicial Judgments
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Objectivity theories and （im）politeness phenomena
5.3 Objectivity reflected in the politeness strategies
5.4 Objectivity reflected in the impoliteness
5.5 Summary
Chapter 6 Conclusion
6.1 Summary of the present study
6.2 Conclusion
6.3 Implications
6.4 Limitations and suggestions for further research
References
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條
1 王霞;論審判公開的形式與實(shí)質(zhì)[J];內(nèi)蒙古社會(huì)科學(xué)(漢文版);2002年01期
2 杜金榜;從目前的研究看法律語(yǔ)言學(xué)學(xué)科體系的構(gòu)建[J];現(xiàn)代外語(yǔ);2000年01期
3 張新紅;漢語(yǔ)立法語(yǔ)篇的言語(yǔ)行為分析[J];現(xiàn)代外語(yǔ);2000年03期
4 張新紅;文本類型與法律文本[J];現(xiàn)代外語(yǔ);2001年02期
5 陳國(guó)利,劉秋平;走出法官獨(dú)立的困境[J];西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期
6 傅郁林;民事裁判文書的功能與風(fēng)格[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué);2000年04期
本文編號(hào)：2865485
本文鏈接：http://www.lk138.cn/falvlunwen/fashilw/2865485.html
最近更新
教材專著
