【摘要】：從接收者"二次敘述化"的視角看,"刺詩"與"淫詩"的界定其實(shí)是不同時(shí)期的解釋社群在面臨《詩經(jīng)》文本時(shí),采取不同的"二次敘述化"方式導(dǎo)致的結(jié)果。"刺詩"與"淫詩"之爭的本質(zhì)也是不同時(shí)期的解釋社群在接受《詩經(jīng)》時(shí)的"二次敘述化"方式之爭。解釋社群不同,"二次敘述化"的方式就不同,對(duì)"詩"旨的闡釋也就不同。
[Abstract]:From the point of view of the receiver's "second narrative", the definition of "thorny poem" and "pornographic poem" is actually the result of different ways of "second narrating" taken by the interpretive community in different periods when faced with the text of the Book of songs. " The essence of the dispute between the poem of sting and the poem of obscenity is also the dispute of the way of "the second narrative" in the acceptance of the Book of songs by the interpretive community in different periods. Different interpretation of community, the way of the second narrative is different, and the interpretation of the purpose of the poem is different.
【作者單位】： 上海大學(xué)文學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社科基金重大項(xiàng)目“中國詩歌敘事傳統(tǒng)研究”(152DB067)
【分類號(hào)】：I207.22

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 趙毅衡;;論二次敘述[J];福建論壇(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年01期

2 薛海燕;王大鵬;;次敘述層中的小故事在《紅樓夢(mèng)》中的功能[J];紅樓夢(mèng)學(xué)刊;2006年05期

3 馬立軍;;從世次敘述看北朝姓族制度對(duì)墓志寫作的影響[J];文藝評(píng)論;2012年08期

，

本文編號(hào)：2454059