發(fā)布時間：2018-05-20 11:40

  本文選題：張問陶 + 《船山詩草》�。� 參考：《四川師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：學(xué)術(shù)界往往將張問陶詩學(xué)觀點視為袁枚的附庸,而這種看法主要是由《清史稿》、《清續(xù)文獻(xiàn)通考》的誤導(dǎo)所致。雖然有的學(xué)者早已澄清這一事實,卻似未引起相當(dāng)?shù)闹匾�。筆者考證出“推袁”二字典出于《世說新語》,《推袁集》主要用于與袁枚的交游,而非心折于其詩學(xué)理論。詩寫性靈是乾嘉時期的一股風(fēng)潮,袁枚的詩學(xué)觀念與同時代人并非源與流的關(guān)系,他們是并列存在的。很多詩人接觸到“性情說”的渠道不同,這也導(dǎo)致了作家們對其內(nèi)涵的理解存在分歧。張問陶詩學(xué)淵源可以上溯到李白、杜甫、蘇軾諸人,而對他影響最為深刻的是其塾師馬杏里。張問陶的“性情說”認(rèn)為詩歌不僅要寫性情之真還要出乎于性情之正,所謂性情正就是要將忠孝為核心的儒家道德品質(zhì)內(nèi)化在個人的品性修養(yǎng)之中,并非純?nèi)巫匀弧�張問陶認(rèn)為詩歌能見出作家的品格,詩人應(yīng)注重人品和器識的修養(yǎng)。就創(chuàng)作而言,他認(rèn)為作家的創(chuàng)作動機(jī)是詩發(fā)乎情,有真情然后才能有真詩,反對艱新趁韻之作,主張創(chuàng)作主體應(yīng)具備充沛的情感和豐富的閱歷。詩歌創(chuàng)作的風(fēng)格以自然為旨?xì)w。就創(chuàng)作技法言,他的“無師論”漠視傳統(tǒng),體現(xiàn)出很明顯的師心自任的傾向。他主張不依門戶、不學(xué)古人、不重技法,用詩歌來寫真情、記真事、繪真境�？傊�,“真”從詩歌創(chuàng)作的基本要求上升成為了終極目的。在詩用論上,張問陶主張用詩來記錄真實經(jīng)歷,把詩歌降格成為記錄的工具。事實上這種新變特征仍然是對詩歌“寫真”的推崇,“真”給了他抗衡千古的信心。他企圖淡化詩歌的工拙概念,不再去追尋作品在整個詩歌史上的價值,惟以自達(dá)其真是求,從而找到詩歌創(chuàng)作的意義。這背后折射出的是處在歷史軌道中的后來作者無法超越前賢的焦慮。張問陶的詩學(xué)觀念并不是孤立的,其詩友方元鯤、朱文治等人的詩論都體現(xiàn)出相同的傾向。
[Abstract]:The academic circles often regard Zhang Wentao's poetics view as the vassal of Yuan Mei, and this view is mainly caused by the misdirection of "the draft of Qing Dynasty History" and "the General examination of Qing continuous Literature". Although some scholars have already clarified this fact, it does not seem to attract considerable attention. The author points out that the second dictionary of "pushing Yuan" is mainly used to travel with Yuan Mei, rather than his poetic theory. Poetry writing spirit is a trend in Qianjia period. Yuan Mei's poetic concept and contemporary people are not the relationship between source and flow, they are juxtaposed. Many poets have different access to the theory of temperament, which leads to different understanding of its connotation. Zhang Wentao's poetics can be traced back to Li Bai, du Fu and Su Shi. Zhang Wentao's "temperament theory" thinks that poetry should not only write about the truth of temperament but also the truth of temperament. The so-called temperament is to internalize the Confucian moral quality of loyalty and filial piety as the core of the individual, and is not purely natural. Zhang Wentao believes that poetry can see the character of the writer, and the poet should pay attention to the cultivation of personality and artistry. As far as creation is concerned, he thinks that the motive of the writer's creation is the emotion of poetry, and then he can have the true poem. He opposes the hard new rhyme, and argues that the creative subject should have abundant emotion and rich experience. The style of poetry creation aims at nature. In terms of creative techniques, his "theory of no teacher" ignores tradition and shows a clear tendency of self-appointment. He advocated not to follow the door, not to learn the ancients, not to pay attention to the techniques, to use poetry to write true feelings, to remember the truth, and to draw the true environment. In a word, truth has become the ultimate aim from the basic requirement of poetry creation. In the theory of poetry use, Zhang Wentao advocated the use of poetry to record real experience and demote poetry as a tool for recording. In fact, this new feature is still the praise of poetry, "True" gave him the confidence to counterbalance the ages. He tried to dilute the concept of poetry and no longer pursue the value of his works in the whole history of poetry. Behind this reflects the anxiety of the later authors, who are on the track of history, unable to surmount the former sages. Zhang Wentao's poetic ideas are not isolated, his poetry friends Fang YuanKun, Zhu Wenzhi and others have the same tendency.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：I207.22

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蔣寅;;洪亮吉的詩學(xué)觀念與本朝詩歌批評[J];文學(xué)遺產(chǎn);2015年03期

2 胡傳淮;;張問陶全國學(xué)術(shù)研討會綜述[J];四川職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2015年02期

3 鄭家治;;張問陶與杜甫:張氏詩學(xué)、詩歌淵源初探[J];四川職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2014年04期

4 蔣寅;;乾嘉之際詩歌自我表現(xiàn)觀念的極端化傾向——以張問陶的詩論為中心[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2014年01期

5 蔣寅;;法式善:乾嘉之際詩學(xué)轉(zhuǎn)型的典型個案[J];江漢論壇;2013年08期

6 鄒鵬;;“性靈派”譜系的理論缺陷及就宗派立論的誤區(qū)[J];社會科學(xué)家;2011年11期

7 鄒鵬;;張問陶與袁枚詩派傳承關(guān)系之慎論[J];求索;2010年04期

8 溫秀珍;;張問陶性靈詩論兼與袁枚、趙翼性靈說之比較[J];蘇州大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2007年05期

9 鄭家治;;張問陶袁枚詩論異同簡論[J];四川師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2006年06期

10 胡傳淮;;簡論張問陶在清詩史上的地位[J];聊城大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2006年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張麗華;清代乾嘉時期唐宋詩之爭流變研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2008年

2 溫秀珍;張問陶論詩詩及其詩論研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 潘曉美;清代“燕南二俊”詩歌與詩論研究[D];河北師范大學(xué);2013年

2 董孟;孫原湘交游與性靈派發(fā)展研究[D];揚州大學(xué);2012年

3 王旋;張問陶對杜詩的接受研究[D];西南大學(xué);2012年

4 姜月芹;方元濵及其詩歌研究[D];浙江師范大學(xué);2011年

5 鄭詩雨;洪亮吉詩學(xué)思想研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2011年

6 彭玉美;揚棄與超越[D];山東大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：1914473