發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-11 10:25

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：政治環(huán)境視野下的三十年代“文藝自由論辯”　出處：《山東師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 文藝自由論辯 胡秋原 蘇汶 左聯(lián)

【摘要】：20世紀(jì)30年代是中國(guó)社會(huì)發(fā)生重大轉(zhuǎn)變的時(shí)期,中國(guó)面臨著內(nèi)憂外患的雙重危機(jī)。隨著國(guó)共兩黨政治勢(shì)力上的發(fā)展需求,雙方的政治斗爭(zhēng)日趨激烈。30年代初,胡秋原、蘇汶與左聯(lián)展開的“文藝自由論辯”深受30年代政治背景、時(shí)代環(huán)境的影響。因此筆者深入到這場(chǎng)論辯背后的時(shí)代環(huán)境,對(duì)這場(chǎng)文藝論爭(zhēng)發(fā)生的原因,發(fā)展的過程進(jìn)行更為全面的闡釋,以此來呈現(xiàn)這場(chǎng)論爭(zhēng)的豐富性。1931年至1933年,左聯(lián)與胡秋原、蘇汶進(jìn)行的關(guān)于文藝自由問題的論辯,并不是文藝發(fā)展的單行線,它是文化與政治多重復(fù)雜因素的組合體。20世紀(jì)30年代,國(guó)際和中國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)政治形勢(shì)發(fā)生了巨大改變,國(guó)民黨隨著政治發(fā)展的需要,文學(xué)也隨之納入政治言說的體系內(nèi),成為為政治服務(wù)的手段之一。進(jìn)入30年代,作家和文藝?yán)碚摷也粌H要在內(nèi)憂外患的政治環(huán)境中生存,而且其文學(xué)道路和文學(xué)理念受到政治環(huán)境的影響。由胡秋原引發(fā)的這場(chǎng)文藝自由論辯的發(fā)生,正是基于政治環(huán)境下文學(xué)價(jià)值的轉(zhuǎn)變。在論爭(zhēng)過程中,左聯(lián)一方做出的決策以及改變都離不開當(dāng)時(shí)政治環(huán)境的影響。政治斗爭(zhēng)的形勢(shì)下,國(guó)共兩黨的文化策略,黨派人員對(duì)文藝的干預(yù),以及形成的政治化的文學(xué)審美標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與價(jià)值空間,既是這一論爭(zhēng)發(fā)生的背景,也是影響與推動(dòng)這一論爭(zhēng)發(fā)展的重要因素。這一文藝論爭(zhēng)發(fā)生、發(fā)展的背后離不開當(dāng)時(shí)的時(shí)代環(huán)境,因此筆者把這場(chǎng)文藝論爭(zhēng)放置在當(dāng)時(shí)的政治環(huán)境之下來探究。筆者論文的第一章從論爭(zhēng)的緣起出發(fā),通過分析30年代的政治環(huán)境,以及政治環(huán)境下的文壇形勢(shì),國(guó)共兩黨的文藝政策等方面來探究論爭(zhēng)發(fā)生的背景以及原因。基于當(dāng)時(shí)的文化環(huán)境,胡秋原發(fā)表文章來批判當(dāng)時(shí)過分化的文壇景象,同時(shí)在政治斗爭(zhēng)激烈的環(huán)境中,胡秋原的言論引起了左聯(lián)的注意,引發(fā)了左聯(lián)與胡秋原的論爭(zhēng)。第二章主要分析30年代的政治環(huán)境對(duì)左聯(lián)的文藝?yán)碚摰挠绊憽Ｔ诋?dāng)時(shí)的政治斗爭(zhēng)環(huán)境下,左聯(lián)性質(zhì)決定了與胡秋原、蘇汶不同的立場(chǎng),使其在文藝問題上產(chǎn)生了巨大分歧。同時(shí),左聯(lián)政治性的思維,使其對(duì)胡秋原、蘇汶的言論衍生出文藝之外的理解。第三章主要論述政治環(huán)境對(duì)論爭(zhēng)發(fā)展趨勢(shì)的影響。在論爭(zhēng)過程中,左聯(lián)成員對(duì)胡秋原、蘇汶所表現(xiàn)出的不同態(tài)度,以及后期左聯(lián)成員對(duì)論爭(zhēng)態(tài)度的緩和與當(dāng)時(shí)的政治環(huán)境和政治發(fā)展的需要相關(guān)。通過這幾個(gè)方面的分析以此來展現(xiàn)這一文藝論爭(zhēng)過程的發(fā)展并不是單一的,而是深受時(shí)代政治環(huán)境因素的影響。30年代初期,左聯(lián)與胡秋原、蘇汶的這場(chǎng)文藝論辯的發(fā)生與當(dāng)時(shí)的政治環(huán)境緊密相關(guān)。因此筆者在政治環(huán)境視角下探究這一文學(xué)論爭(zhēng),通過查閱參與論爭(zhēng)的人員的文章去全面的展開這場(chǎng)論爭(zhēng),去挖掘論爭(zhēng)發(fā)生的時(shí)代根源,文學(xué)論爭(zhēng)的時(shí)代訴求與意義。筆者以文學(xué)論爭(zhēng)的發(fā)生、發(fā)展過程為基點(diǎn),來探究政治環(huán)境因素對(duì)其產(chǎn)生的多重影響,展現(xiàn)這一文藝論爭(zhēng)的政治與文化方面的多面性與多重價(jià)值。
[Abstract]:1930s is China big changes in society period, China face a double crisis. Domestic trouble and foreign invasion with the development needs of the KMT political forces on both sides, the fierce political struggle in the early.30, Hu Qiuyuan, Su Wen and the expansion of the "literary free debate" in 30s by the political background, the influence of the social environment. Therefore the author behind this debate era, the reasons of literary debates occur, the process of development of a more comprehensive interpretation, so as to present this debate the richness of.1931 to 1933, and the Hu Qiuyuan, Su Wen on the issue of artistic freedom and the development of literature debate, not a single line and it is the political and cultural complex factors in the.20 century in 30s, great changes have taken place in the international and domestic political situation China, the Kuomintang with politics. The needs of the development of literature, also will be incorporated into the political discourse system, become one of the political means. In 30s, the writers and literary theorists must not only survive in the domestic trouble and foreign invasion of the political environment, and the road of literature and literary ideas influenced by political environment. By Hu Qiuyuan triggered by the literature on the freedom of the occurrence of it is a change of the political environment based on the value of literature. During the debate, the party made the decision and change all cannot do without the political environment at that time. The political struggle situation, cultural strategy between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party, the party personnel intervention on literature and art, and the formation of political literature aesthetic standard and value is space, the controversy occurred in the background, is also an important factor affecting and promoting the development of debate. This literary controversy occurred behind the development cannot do without the time The environment, so I put it down in the literary inquiry placed the political environment at that time. The author of the first chapter of the thesis from the origin of the controversy, in 30s through the analysis of the political environment and the political environment of the literary world situation, the KMT's literary policy and other aspects to explore the background and reason of controversy. At the time of the culture based on the environment, Hu Qiuyuan published an article criticizing the literary scene at that time had differentiation in the political struggle at the same time, in the fierce environment, Hu Qiuyuan's remarks caused the attention, caused the controversy with Hu Qiuyuan. The second chapter mainly analyzes the influence of the political environment of the 30s literary theory. At the time of the political struggle next, the nature of Hu Qiuyuan and Su Wen, different positions, which produced a huge difference in the problem. At the same time, the political thinking, the Hu Qiuyuan, Su Wen's speech derived from outside the literary understanding. The third chapter discusses the influence of the political environment on the development trend of the debate. During the debate, the members of Hu Qiuyuan, Su Wen showed different attitudes, and later the members of the debate with slow attitude when the political environment and political the development of related. Through the analysis of the several aspects in order to show the development and the process of literary debate is not a single, but by the time the political environment influencing factors of.30 in the early 1990s, leftist and Hu Qiuyuan, had a literary argument of Su Wen and closely related to the political environment at that time. So the author explore the literature from the perspective of political debate in the environment, through consulting personnel participating in the debate of the article to start the debate completely, to dig the root of times controversy occurred, the era of literature debate v. Based on the occurrence and development process of literary debate, the author explores the multiple influences of political and environmental factors on it, and reveals the multifaceted and multiple values of the political and cultural aspects of this literary debate.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：I206.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳曉東;;從蘇汶的視角觀照:“文藝自由論辯”重釋[J];文藝爭(zhēng)鳴;2016年07期

2 吳述橋;;張聞天《文藝戰(zhàn)線上的關(guān)門主義》與“第三種人”論爭(zhēng)[J];中國(guó)現(xiàn)代文學(xué)研究叢刊;2016年05期

3 張景蘭;;耐人尋味的沉默與友善——論“文藝自由論辯”中魯迅對(duì)胡秋原的態(tài)度及其原因[J];煙臺(tái)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年06期

4 王福湘;;“第三種人”與中左文人之辨——為施蟄存正名論之政治篇[J];魯迅研究月刊;2013年09期

5 張寧;;同途·殊途·同歸——魯迅與胡秋原[J];文史哲;2012年06期

6 張景蘭;;“藝術(shù)正確”與歷史困境——論“文藝自由論辯”中胡秋原與左聯(lián)理論家的分歧[J];江海學(xué)刊;2010年05期

7 吳述橋;;“第三種人”論爭(zhēng)與“左聯(lián)”組織理論的轉(zhuǎn)向——從“左聯(lián)”的宗派主義、關(guān)門主義問題談起[J];中國(guó)文學(xué)研究;2010年02期

8 胡梅仙;;文學(xué)的方向與傾向——左聯(lián)時(shí)期魯迅與“自由人”、“第三種人”的論爭(zhēng)[J];文史哲;2010年01期

9 楊勝剛;;中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)與左聯(lián)[J];江漢論壇;2009年08期

10 張景蘭;;隱含話語、政治策略與倫理立場(chǎng)的夾纏——再論左聯(lián)、魯迅與“第三種人”的論爭(zhēng)[J];文史哲;2009年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 魏宏波;政治話語視域下的1928年革命文學(xué)[D];遼寧大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1409176