由北宋農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)看國(guó)家的經(jīng)濟(jì)特征
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-29 06:02
【摘要】：北宋是一個(gè)欣欣向榮的朝代。隨著唐代中后期商品經(jīng)濟(jì)的恢復(fù)和發(fā)展,使得土地兼并如洪水猛獸,由此引發(fā)貧富分化等連鎖反應(yīng)。這促使國(guó)家推行“兩稅法”來(lái)適應(yīng)經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)的變化。但它卻帶來(lái)意想不到的后果,其中之一就是土地兼并的加速前進(jìn)。而“不抑兼并”導(dǎo)致地產(chǎn)集中,由此帶來(lái)入宋以后富民階層的崛起。富民階層由于沒(méi)有政治特權(quán)不得不依靠經(jīng)濟(jì)手段維持剝削,這主要通過(guò)契約形式實(shí)現(xiàn),最終使得契約租佃入宋以后終成氣候。這一歷史變遷過(guò)程反映了國(guó)家傳統(tǒng)職能的變遷。本文作者認(rèn)為,國(guó)家在這個(gè)過(guò)程中不單純是被迫對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)變化做出調(diào)整,而是一個(gè)辯證的過(guò)程。此進(jìn)程反映出國(guó)家的一些經(jīng)濟(jì)特征。 本論文分別從這幾個(gè)方面進(jìn)行闡述： 第一部分是緒論。這部分闡述文章的選題初衷,即發(fā)軔于對(duì)導(dǎo)師《兩周土地制度新論》及其他論文的思考。由此出發(fā)驗(yàn)證,尋找資料的過(guò)程也就是該部分中的研究動(dòng)態(tài)所體現(xiàn)出來(lái)的。 第二部分是北宋農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)體現(xiàn)出的特征。該部分就此進(jìn)行闡述和分析,從分析中抽象出基本理論要素。 第三部分,銜接上一部分思路進(jìn)行展開(kāi)。這個(gè)部分首先分析處于唐宋變革下國(guó)家職能是如何轉(zhuǎn)變的,以及這些轉(zhuǎn)變的外在表現(xiàn),即“不抑兼并”和“契約租佃制”。進(jìn)而從這種轉(zhuǎn)變中分析出國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)利益的職能或者說(shuō)屬性。接下來(lái)就國(guó)家這種經(jīng)濟(jì)利益進(jìn)行分析,在闡述的過(guò)過(guò)程盡量將分析框架置于北宋之內(nèi),做到理論回歸于實(shí)踐。 第四部分余論。主要就本文邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行梳理,最后總結(jié)出文章的主旨。
[Abstract]:The Northern Song Dynasty was a thriving dynasty. With the recovery and development of the commodity economy in the middle and late Tang Dynasty, land annexation was like a flood, which led to a chain reaction, such as the polarization between the rich and the poor. This prompted the country to implement the "two tax laws" to adapt to economic and social changes. But it brings unexpected consequences, one of which is the acceleration of land annexation. And "do not suppress merger" leads to the concentration of real estate, which led to the rise of the rich people after the Song Dynasty. The rich people had to rely on economic means to maintain exploitation because they had no political privilege, which was mainly realized by contract form, and finally made the tenancy of contract become the climate after Song Dynasty. This historical change process reflects the change of the traditional function of the country. The author believes that the state is not only forced to adjust the economic and social changes in this process, but a dialectical process. This process reflects some of the country's economic characteristics. This paper separately from these several aspects carries on the elaboration: the first part is the introduction. This part expounds the original intention of this article, that is, the author thinks about the tutor, the New Theory of Land system in two weeks, and other papers. From this point of view, the process of searching for data is reflected by the research dynamics in this part. The second part is the characteristics of agricultural economy in Northern Song Dynasty. In this part, the basic theoretical elements are abstracted from the analysis. The third part, link up part of the train of thought to carry on the development. This part first analyzes how the state functions changed under the transformation of Tang and Song dynasties, as well as the external manifestations of these changes, that is, "not restraining mergers" and "contractual tenancy system". Then analyze the function or attribute of national economic interest from this kind of transformation. Then the economic interests of the state are analyzed, and the analysis framework is put into the Northern Song Dynasty as far as possible in the process of elaboration, so as to return the theory to practice. The fourth part is the conclusion. This paper mainly combed the logical structure, and finally summed up the main purpose of the article.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：陜西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：K244;F329
本文編號(hào)：2151759
[Abstract]:The Northern Song Dynasty was a thriving dynasty. With the recovery and development of the commodity economy in the middle and late Tang Dynasty, land annexation was like a flood, which led to a chain reaction, such as the polarization between the rich and the poor. This prompted the country to implement the "two tax laws" to adapt to economic and social changes. But it brings unexpected consequences, one of which is the acceleration of land annexation. And "do not suppress merger" leads to the concentration of real estate, which led to the rise of the rich people after the Song Dynasty. The rich people had to rely on economic means to maintain exploitation because they had no political privilege, which was mainly realized by contract form, and finally made the tenancy of contract become the climate after Song Dynasty. This historical change process reflects the change of the traditional function of the country. The author believes that the state is not only forced to adjust the economic and social changes in this process, but a dialectical process. This process reflects some of the country's economic characteristics. This paper separately from these several aspects carries on the elaboration: the first part is the introduction. This part expounds the original intention of this article, that is, the author thinks about the tutor, the New Theory of Land system in two weeks, and other papers. From this point of view, the process of searching for data is reflected by the research dynamics in this part. The second part is the characteristics of agricultural economy in Northern Song Dynasty. In this part, the basic theoretical elements are abstracted from the analysis. The third part, link up part of the train of thought to carry on the development. This part first analyzes how the state functions changed under the transformation of Tang and Song dynasties, as well as the external manifestations of these changes, that is, "not restraining mergers" and "contractual tenancy system". Then analyze the function or attribute of national economic interest from this kind of transformation. Then the economic interests of the state are analyzed, and the analysis framework is put into the Northern Song Dynasty as far as possible in the process of elaboration, so as to return the theory to practice. The fourth part is the conclusion. This paper mainly combed the logical structure, and finally summed up the main purpose of the article.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：陜西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：K244;F329
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 王f ;;傳統(tǒng)中國(guó)社會(huì)中租佃制度對(duì)產(chǎn)出的作用分析——基于德懷特·希·帕金斯視角的研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2006年03期
2 林文勛;商品經(jīng)濟(jì)與唐宋社會(huì)變革[J];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)史研究;2004年01期
3 霍存福;論中國(guó)古代契約與國(guó)家法的關(guān)系——以唐代法律與借貸契約的關(guān)系為中心[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2005年01期
4 吳承明;研究經(jīng)濟(jì)史的一些體會(huì)[J];近代史研究;2005年03期
5 馬興東;宋代“不立田制”問(wèn)題試析[J];史學(xué)月刊;1990年06期
6 柴榮;透視宋代的土地兼并問(wèn)題[J];西南民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年01期
7 于干千;;基于博弈論的“不抑兼并”土地制度分析——以唐宋農(nóng)地制度的演進(jìn)為視角[J];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)史研究;2007年01期
8 楊際平;;宋代“田制不立”、“不抑兼并”說(shuō)駁議[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)史研究;2006年02期
9 柴榮;透視宋代土地租佃制度——對(duì)宋代土地經(jīng)營(yíng)過(guò)程有關(guān)法律問(wèn)題的思考[J];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文.社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年03期
10 謝元魯;對(duì)唐宋社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)制度變遷的再思考[J];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)史研究;2005年02期
，本文編號(hào)：2151759
本文鏈接：http://www.lk138.cn/shekelunwen/zgtslw/2151759.html
教材專著
