發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-13 06:39

  本文選題：傳銷(xiāo)　切入點(diǎn)：網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳銷(xiāo)犯罪　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：近年來(lái)，隨著互聯(lián)網(wǎng)在日常生活和現(xiàn)代商業(yè)中的廣泛應(yīng)用，互聯(lián)網(wǎng)交易的低成本、高效率、傳播廣等特點(diǎn)，非常適合其在傳銷(xiāo)行為中被重點(diǎn)利用，，使其成為了傳銷(xiāo)組織趨之若鶩的重要工具，傳統(tǒng)的傳銷(xiāo)犯罪逐漸向網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳銷(xiāo)犯罪發(fā)展。較之前者，后者發(fā)展速度快、危害程度大、查處難度大，給執(zhí)法部門(mén)的監(jiān)管和查處帶來(lái)了新的課題。本文試從現(xiàn)階段網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳銷(xiāo)犯罪的概念、模式、特點(diǎn)、表現(xiàn)形式、與傳統(tǒng)傳銷(xiāo)犯罪異同、立法狀況、偵查對(duì)策等方面分析入手，探索切實(shí)可行的監(jiān)管方案和查處對(duì)策，為執(zhí)法部門(mén)提供有效參考。 全文共分五章，具體內(nèi)容如下： 第一章介紹了網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳銷(xiāo)的由來(lái)及網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳銷(xiāo)犯罪的定義�；ヂ�(lián)網(wǎng)在人們生活中的廣泛使用，使其被傳銷(xiāo)犯罪分子加以重點(diǎn)利用。同時(shí)由于我國(guó)政府持續(xù)以高壓態(tài)勢(shì)打擊傳銷(xiāo)犯罪，傳銷(xiāo)組織者試圖將互聯(lián)網(wǎng)作為躲避執(zhí)法的一道“防火墻”，導(dǎo)致了網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳銷(xiāo)犯罪的產(chǎn)生及蔓延。目前學(xué)理上尚未明確網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳銷(xiāo)犯罪的概念，筆者試參考傳銷(xiāo)犯罪的概念對(duì)其定義。 第二章介紹了網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳銷(xiāo)的模式、網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳銷(xiāo)犯罪的特點(diǎn)及與傳統(tǒng)傳銷(xiāo)犯罪關(guān)系。一般認(rèn)為，網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳銷(xiāo)模式分為傳統(tǒng)傳銷(xiāo)的網(wǎng)絡(luò)版模式、網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息傳銷(xiāo)模式、新興互聯(lián)網(wǎng)傳銷(xiāo)模式。網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳銷(xiāo)犯罪具有隱蔽性高、跨區(qū)域性強(qiáng)、欺騙性強(qiáng)、結(jié)算資金迅速、發(fā)現(xiàn)、查處困難等特點(diǎn)，其與傳統(tǒng)傳銷(xiāo)犯罪既有聯(lián)系又有區(qū)別。 第三章介紹了筆者對(duì)于網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳銷(xiāo)犯罪的立法思考。目前我國(guó)沒(méi)有一部全國(guó)性的電子商務(wù)法規(guī)，司法實(shí)際中打擊網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳銷(xiāo)犯罪參照關(guān)于傳銷(xiāo)犯罪的立法，這種法律適用模式有其不足之處。筆者在對(duì)其進(jìn)行分析的基本上，參考國(guó)外就相同問(wèn)題的立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)，對(duì)完善網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳銷(xiāo)犯罪的立法提出建議。 第四章介紹了網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳銷(xiāo)犯罪的立案管轄問(wèn)題。由于網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳銷(xiāo)犯罪的特殊性和與傳銷(xiāo)的刑事管轄權(quán)理論的不兼容性，故傳統(tǒng)的級(jí)別管轄與地域管轄對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳銷(xiāo)犯罪不盡適用，有必要重新確立相關(guān)原則完善網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳銷(xiāo)犯罪的管轄權(quán)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。 第五章介紹了網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳銷(xiāo)犯罪的偵查對(duì)策。對(duì)此，目前網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳銷(xiāo)犯罪的宏觀偵查模式在偵查協(xié)作、偵查介入、偵查技術(shù)、偵查公開(kāi)均存在缺陷，不利于及時(shí)有效地打擊犯罪，有必要對(duì)其進(jìn)行重建。其次，要進(jìn)一步深入研究網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳銷(xiāo)犯罪偵查和取證的具體策略、方法。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the wide application of the Internet in daily life and modern business, the characteristics of Internet transaction, such as low cost, high efficiency and wide dissemination, are very suitable to be used in pyramid marketing. It has become an important tool for pyramid marketing organizations, and the traditional pyramid selling crime has gradually developed to the network pyramid selling crime. The latter has developed faster, more harmful and more difficult to investigate and deal with. This paper tries to analyze the concept, mode, characteristics, manifestation, similarities and differences between the network pyramid selling crime and the traditional pyramid selling crime, legislative status, investigation countermeasures and so on. To explore feasible supervision scheme and investigation and punishment countermeasures, to provide effective reference for law enforcement departments. The full text is divided into five chapters, the specific content is as follows:. The first chapter introduces the origin of network pyramid selling and the definition of network pyramid selling crime. It has been used mainly by pyramid selling criminals. At the same time, because our government continues to crack down on pyramid selling crimes with high pressure, The organizer of MLM tries to take the Internet as a "firewall" to evade the law enforcement, which leads to the emergence and spread of the crime of MLM. At present, the concept of MLM is not clear in theory, and the author tries to refer to the definition of MLM crime with reference to the concept of MLM. The second chapter introduces the mode of network pyramid selling, the characteristics of network pyramid selling and its relationship with traditional pyramid selling. The crime of network pyramid selling has the characteristics of high concealment, strong cross-regional, deceptive, quick settlement of funds, discovery, difficulty in investigation and so on, which is not only related to but also different from the traditional pyramid selling crime. The third chapter introduces the author's legislative thinking on the crime of network pyramid selling. At present, there is no national electronic commerce regulation in our country. In judicial practice, the crime of network pyramid selling is dealt with by reference to the legislation on pyramid selling. This mode of law application has its shortcomings. The author makes some suggestions to perfect the legislation of network pyramid selling crime by referring to the foreign legislative experience on the same problem. Chapter 4th introduces the jurisdiction of the network pyramid selling crime. Because of the particularity of the network pyramid selling crime and the incompatibility with the criminal jurisdiction theory of the network pyramid selling, the traditional level jurisdiction and regional jurisdiction are not applicable to the network pyramid selling crime. It is necessary to re-establish relevant principles to perfect the jurisdiction standard of network pyramid selling crime. Chapter 5th introduces the investigation countermeasure of network pyramid selling crime. In view of this, at present, the macro investigation mode of network pyramid selling crime has defects in investigation cooperation, investigation intervention, investigation technique and investigation openness, which is not conducive to cracking down on crime in time and effectively. It is necessary to reconstruct it. Secondly, it is necessary to further study the specific strategies and methods of network pyramid selling crime investigation and evidence collection.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3;D918

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐飛行;張春鋒;王斌;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳銷(xiāo)犯罪偵查模式研究[J];福建警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年01期

2 皮勇;略論網(wǎng)絡(luò)上計(jì)算機(jī)犯罪與對(duì)策[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1998年01期

3 曹文智;梁彬;;經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪偵查的地域管轄研究[J];中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年03期

4 宮路;丁力;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳銷(xiāo)犯罪模式及偵查對(duì)策研究[J];公安研究;2007年12期

5 陳曉敏;初探網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳銷(xiāo)及其監(jiān)管[J];中國(guó)工商管理研究;2002年03期

6 龔萍;江祝根;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳銷(xiāo)的行為特點(diǎn)及對(duì)策[J];工商行政管理;2006年06期

7 胡寧;;計(jì)算機(jī)取證技術(shù)探討[J];電腦知識(shí)與技術(shù)(學(xué)術(shù)交流);2007年10期

8 王小青;;組織、領(lǐng)導(dǎo)傳銷(xiāo)活動(dòng)罪解析[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2009年05期

9 呂云平;經(jīng)濟(jì)案件偵查中的偵查協(xié)作[J];山西警官高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2002年02期

10 孫振江;石鋒;;論組織、領(lǐng)導(dǎo)傳銷(xiāo)活動(dòng)罪的主體范圍[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2010年20期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 福建省尤溪縣工商局 林長(zhǎng)煌;[N];中國(guó)工商報(bào);2008年

2 北京師范大學(xué)刑事法律科學(xué)研究院研究生 馬志萍;[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 侯林;電子數(shù)據(jù)證據(jù)的若干法律問(wèn)題研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2004年

2 蔣中云;基于多代理的網(wǎng)絡(luò)入侵動(dòng)態(tài)取證的研究[D];江南大學(xué);2006年

3 郭曉穎;刑事訴訟管轄制度研究[D];河北大學(xué);2007年

4 許佳;組織、領(lǐng)導(dǎo)傳銷(xiāo)活動(dòng)罪的立法及司法適用研究[D];上海社會(huì)科學(xué)院;2010年

5 王鋼;論組織、領(lǐng)導(dǎo)傳銷(xiāo)活動(dòng)罪[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

本文編號(hào)：1605209