本文選題：“前城中村” + 有組織��； 參考：《華南理工大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：在快速城市化過程中，城市的擴張需要以農(nóng)村的耕地作為空間載體，因此城市與農(nóng)村的矛盾主要是對于空間以及其開發(fā)權(quán)的爭奪，是為獲得城市化過程中城市邊緣區(qū)的農(nóng)地開發(fā)效益的博弈。城鄉(xiāng)二元結(jié)構(gòu)導致的農(nóng)村集體建設用地與土地開發(fā)權(quán)的矛盾使土地征收成為其合法開發(fā)的唯一途徑，另外繞開村建設用地的征收方式更是缺乏遠見的，給村莊建設留下了重大隱患，從而使村莊在外來人口以及經(jīng)濟效益的刺激下無序發(fā)展，嚴重破壞傳統(tǒng)村落空間及文化。以傳統(tǒng)文化為代價的村莊無組織建設，只能將村莊引向“城中村”，最終形成城市的經(jīng)濟文化“塌陷區(qū)”，極大增加村莊改造的經(jīng)濟及社會成本。 廣州市花都汽車城周邊的村莊正顯現(xiàn)出向“城中村”發(fā)展的趨向，本文以“前城中村”定義了這種發(fā)展中的即將成為“城中村”的村落。并以此為對象進行研究。 花都汽車城作為綜合性的產(chǎn)業(yè)園區(qū)，給周邊“前城中村”帶來了大量外來人口及資金，極大刺激了土地和房屋租金的上漲。在經(jīng)濟效益的沖擊下，村莊從自組織發(fā)展變成了無組織的發(fā)展建設，原有聚落形態(tài)以及建筑形式都在迅速發(fā)生變化，舒適為主的建設理念被利益為主的建設理念所代替，握手樓、一線天等現(xiàn)象逐漸出現(xiàn)。 針對花都汽車城周邊“前城中村”建設中存在的問題以及朱村拆遷安置方案的滿意度調(diào)查結(jié)果進行反思，，本文提出以“前城中村”集體行為為基礎(chǔ)的，高效開發(fā)的宅基地創(chuàng)新制度——有組織建設模式。有組織建設模式根據(jù)“前城中村”傳統(tǒng)文化遺存保留狀況，分為經(jīng)濟主導以及經(jīng)濟文化協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展兩種模式，以適應不同村莊發(fā)展需求。 經(jīng)濟主導的宅基地制度創(chuàng)新模式主要通過用新村宅基地置換舊村宅基地，從而騰出舊村，形成完整地塊，然后按照“一戶一宅”的原則將多余宅基地進行整合，通過多種融資方式建設集資公寓，作為周邊工廠宿舍或者廉租房統(tǒng)一出租。這樣不僅可以形成良好的城市空間環(huán)境，避免城中村的形成，通過高效的土地開發(fā)建設集資公寓，在為村民提供部分工作崗位和更高的集體收入的同時還能形成“村——政府——企業(yè)——低收入人群”的多方互動。 從傳統(tǒng)的文化保護角度出發(fā)，本文還提出了經(jīng)濟文化協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展的模式。通過舊村基礎(chǔ)設施建設，改善居住環(huán)境；示范性建設推廣，改變舊有觀念；改造技術(shù)支持，鼓勵自主改造等多種手段活化舊村。然后依據(jù)“一戶一宅”的原則進行舊宅基地調(diào)配，多余宅基地和新村與政府征收的耕地進行用地置換，形成完整地塊。通過住宅用地與集資公寓捆綁建設，低價招拍掛的形式進行建設。土地出讓金收益應還原村莊的基礎(chǔ)設施建設，實現(xiàn)實質(zhì)上的毛地出讓，鼓勵村民進行主動拆遷。最后，舊村傳統(tǒng)文化活化以及經(jīng)濟發(fā)展形成互動互利的可持續(xù)發(fā)展。 有組織建設模式以基于血緣和宗親關(guān)系的集體行動作為基礎(chǔ)，挑戰(zhàn)傳統(tǒng)前城中村發(fā)展過程中對傳統(tǒng)鄉(xiāng)村文化的忽視，以宅基地制度創(chuàng)新保證村民經(jīng)濟增長，以傳統(tǒng)文化保護意識的增強作為活化鄉(xiāng)村文化的路徑，形成經(jīng)濟文化協(xié)調(diào)，城鄉(xiāng)協(xié)調(diào)，村——企——政府——低收入人群多方協(xié)調(diào)。但該模式由于需要以政府作為有效中介，考驗了當前執(zhí)政環(huán)境下政府的協(xié)調(diào)能力以及執(zhí)行能力。
[Abstract]:In the rapid urbanization process , the expansion of the city needs to use the cultivated land in the countryside as the space carrier , so the contradiction between the urban and rural areas is the game of the agricultural land development benefit of the urban fringe area in the process of urbanization . The contradiction between the rural collective construction land and the land development right caused by the duality structure of the urban and rural areas makes the land expropriation become the only way of its legal development .

The villages around the city of Huadu Automobile in Guangzhou are showing the trend towards the development of " Chengzhong Village " . In this paper , the village of " Chengzhong Village " is defined in the village of " Qiancheng Village " , and the object is studied .

As a comprehensive industrial park , Huadu Automobile City has brought a lot of population and money to the surrounding " Qiancheng Village " , which greatly stimulates the rise of land and housing rent . Under the impact of economic benefit , the village has changed from self - organization to non - organization development , and the original settlement pattern and the building form are replaced by the construction idea of the main interest , the handshake building , the one - line day and so on gradually appear .

In view of the problems existing in the construction of " Qiancheng Village " and the survey result of the resettlement scheme in Zhucun , this paper puts forward a new system of the house innovation system , which is based on the collective behavior of the village of the former city , and has the mode of organization construction . The organization construction mode is divided into two modes of economic dominance and economic culture coordinated development based on the traditional culture of the traditional culture of the former city , so as to meet the development needs of different villages .

The innovation mode of the economy - led house - house system is mainly through the replacement of the old village house with the new village house , thus freeing up the old village , forming the whole land parcel , and then building the fund - raising apartment as the dormitory of the surrounding factory or the low - rent housing according to the principle of " one household one house " , so as to not only form a favorable urban space environment , avoid the formation of the urban middle village , and also form a multi - party interaction of " village _ government _ enterprise _ low - income population " through efficient land development and construction .

From the point of traditional culture protection , this paper also puts forward the mode of harmonious development of economic culture . Through the construction of old village infrastructure , the living environment is improved ;
exemplary construction promotion , change of old concept ;
It is necessary to reform technical support , encourage self - improvement , etc . to activate the old village . Then , according to the principle of " one household one house " , the old house is allocated , the surplus house and the new village are used for land replacement with the cultivated land collected by the government , so as to form a complete land parcel . The income of the land transfer shall be restored to the infrastructure construction of the village and the villagers are encouraged to take active demolition . Finally , the traditional culture of the old village and the economic development form an interactive and mutually beneficial sustainable development .

Based on the collective action based on the relationship between blood and clan , the organization - building model challenges the neglect of traditional rural culture in the process of developing traditional village culture . With the improvement of the traditional culture protection consciousness as the path of activating rural culture , it forms economic and cultural coordination , urban and rural coordination , village _ enterprise _ government _ low - income population multi - party coordination . However , this model has tested the coordination ability and implementation ability of the government under the current ruling environment because of the need of government as an effective intermediary .

【學位授予單位】：華南理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：TU984.114

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張婷;楊山;梁丹;;鄉(xiāng)村城市化動力機制與發(fā)展模式研究——以江蘇省為例[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學;2005年11期

2 繆晨剛;黃志良;;珠三角城郊失地農(nóng)民生存發(fā)展狀況調(diào)查與對策研究[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學;2008年15期

3 李志生;關(guān)于城中村改造的問題[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2002年05期

4 吳智剛,周素紅;城中村改造:政府、城市與村民利益的統(tǒng)一——以廣州市文沖城中村為例[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2005年02期

5 房慶方,馬向明,宋勁松;城中村:從廣東看我國城市化進程中遇到的政策問題[J];城市規(guī)劃;1999年09期

6 姜崇洲,王彤;試論促進產(chǎn)權(quán)明晰的規(guī)劃管制改革——兼論“城中村”的改造[J];城市規(guī)劃;2002年12期

7 王曉東,劉金聲;對城中村改造的幾點認識[J];城市規(guī)劃;2003年11期

8 閆小培,魏立華,周銳波;快速城市化地區(qū)城鄉(xiāng)關(guān)系協(xié)調(diào)研究——以廣州市“城中村”改造為例[J];城市規(guī)劃;2004年03期

9 魏立華,閆小培;“城中村”:存續(xù)前提下的轉(zhuǎn)型——兼論“城中村”改造的可行性模式[J];城市規(guī)劃;2005年07期

10 章光日;顧朝林;;快速城市化進程中的被動城市化問題研究[J];城市規(guī)劃;2006年05期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 李娟;;城中村改造模式探索——以武漢市城中村改造為例[A];建設社會主義新農(nóng)村土地問題研究[C];2006年

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前2條

1 趙之楓;城市化加速時期村莊集聚及規(guī)劃建設研究[D];清華大學;2001年

2 雷振東;整合與重構(gòu)[D];西安建筑科技大學;2005年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前7條

1 黎林;嶺南傳統(tǒng)水鄉(xiāng)古村落[D];中南林業(yè)科技大學;2007年

2 李寶宏;被動型城市化村落轉(zhuǎn)向城市社區(qū)的研究[D];天津大學;2012年

3 余佶;農(nóng)村城市化問題研究[D];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)大學;2001年

4 沈瑩;“城中村”居住形態(tài)的現(xiàn)狀及演變——以西安市為例[D];西安建筑科技大學;2003年

5 張敏;珠江三角洲工業(yè)化進程中的人口城市化問題研究[D];廣東省社會科學院;2007年

6 袁鶯;珠三角地區(qū)失地農(nóng)民就業(yè)問題探討[D];西北大學;2008年

7 劉曉奕;工業(yè)園區(qū)發(fā)展與地區(qū)農(nóng)村人力資源開發(fā)研究[D];四川師范大學;2009年

本文編號：1863711